The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
  • Support the Maine Wire
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Celebrated Democrat NGO Leader Lists Million Dollar Maine McMansion for Sale After Homeland Security, House Oversight Probe His Migrant Agency
  • Auburn Bail Check Leads to Seizure of a Variety of Drugs and Firearms
  • Penobscot Sheriff’s Department Starts the Year With Massive Drug Bust in Enfield
  • Tucker Carlson Grateful Trump’s Maduro Operation Wasn’t Total Regime Change
  • Mills Praises Portland Firefighters, Sidesteps Gateway Communities Scandal
  • Here’s Everything Tim Walz Got Away With As Minnesota Governor
  • Portland Council Greenlights New Entertainment Venue Fee After Live Nation Uproar
  • Mills to Deliver Final State of the State as Costs Squeeze Mainers
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Tuesday, January 6
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
  • Support the Maine Wire
The Maine Wire
Home » News » News » Dems want $500k for DEP bureaucrats to study "climate change"
News

Dems want $500k for DEP bureaucrats to study "climate change"

Steve RobinsonBy Steve RobinsonMay 9, 2013No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

AUGUSTA –The Environment and Natural Resources Committee on Thursday considered a resolve that would spend $500,000 over four years to study the theory of anthropogenic climate change, also known as global warming.

Rep. William Noon (D-Sanford) introduced L.D. 825 in order to study climate change theory and implement the recommendations of Maine’s Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). His resolve directs DEP to resume its study on climate change pursuant to a 2009 resolve in preparation for a bill that would be presented to the 127th Legislature.

According to the fiscal note attached to L.D. 825, the resolve would pull $244,447 from General Fund revenues over the next two years and $251,482 for fiscal year 2014-15. The money would be used to hire one full time Public Service Coordinator I and one part-time Office Associate II. The bill would not hire any climate scientists.

The state first hired staff to address the theorized threat of climate change more than a decade ago.

According to records available at MaineOpenGov.org, DEP hired Paul Van Cott in 1997 as a “Climate Change Manager.” Van Cott’s total compensation was more than $65,000.

In 2000, Van Cott was replaced by John B. Wathen as a climate change manager. Wathen started at $51,297 in total compensation, but by 2003, he was pulling down $84,105 — $65,020 salary plus $19,085 in benefits.

That’s a 163 percent pay increase over three years—for “managing” climate change.

Wathen left the lucrative field of climate change management in 2005.

Near the end of 2008, Gary S. Westerman assumed the position of climate change manager and served until Gov. Paul R. LePage nixed the position in 2011.

Since the elimination of the position, Maine’s climate change has gone completely unmanaged, saving taxpayers roughly $80 grand a year.

S.E. Robinson
Maine Wire Reporter
srobinson@mainepolicy.org

climate change Maine Democrats
Previous ArticleGang of Eleven tax plan changing on eve of public hearing
Next Article Maine ranks 6th on list of bad places to retire
Steve Robinson
  • Twitter

Steve Robinson is the Editor-in-Chief of The Maine Wire. ‪He can be reached by email at Robinson@TheMaineWire.com.

Subscribe to Substack

Related Posts

Celebrated Democrat NGO Leader Lists Million Dollar Maine McMansion for Sale After Homeland Security, House Oversight Probe His Migrant Agency

January 6, 2026

Auburn Bail Check Leads to Seizure of a Variety of Drugs and Firearms

January 6, 2026

Tucker Carlson Grateful Trump’s Maduro Operation Wasn’t Total Regime Change

January 6, 2026

<span class="dsq-postid" data-dsqidentifier="6497 http://www.themainewire.com/?p=6497">No Comments

  1. Ray Bates on May 9, 2013 8:02 PM

    Money well saved!

  2. Les Gibson on May 10, 2013 5:47 AM

    This has to qualify for the stupid bill of the week award from the Dembarrassing Dembiciles. Instead of wasting the money on the myth of global warming why not use it to assist the Lewiston fire victims or towards the hospital debt.

  3. Wayne Leach on May 10, 2013 5:47 AM

    These egotistical Maine Democrats think they can more intelligently and accurately study “global warming” than the thousands of scientists who have already beat this to death? Climate changes, but man’s infinitesimal effect upon it has been proven again and again. Whose pockets is this money supposed to fill, King Angus – again?

  4. New Moorings Farm on May 10, 2013 6:02 AM

    Any discussion of “climate change” needs to begin with the stratospheric aerosol geoengineering that has been going on for decades, also known as chemtrails. Though denied, it is as plain as the stripes in the sky that are NOT contrails.

  5. Jeanne Sullivan on May 10, 2013 7:02 AM

    Not surprising that the Dumbocrats would want to spend $500k on something that is normal, natural and not controllable by humans!

  6. Anonymous on May 10, 2013 8:02 AM

    CO2 increases dramatically over past decade; temps plateau….Nice job managing the faux hysteria for the profit of foreign wind farmers…bye bye carbon traders!

  7. Anonymous on May 10, 2013 8:02 AM

    CO2 increases dramatically over past decade; temps plateau….Nice job managing the faux hysteria for the profit of foreign wind farmers…bye bye carbon traders!

  8. Dirigo Blue on May 10, 2013 1:32 PM

    Yet another example of Robinson not bothering to dig a little it a matter, but instead writing a baseless smear piece to score political points.

    And judging by some of the comments here, many MaineWire readers don’t bother either. So let me do it for you:

    LD825 would direct the DEP to resume it’s study on how best Maine communities should best deal with the most likely impacts of climate change, such as rising sea levels and resultant storm surges. The study was curtailed by the LePage administration, but was the outgrowth of this study issued in February 2010 (also by the DEP):

    http://umaine.edu/maineclimatenews/files/2011/06/NAT_003_Booklet_6_forWeb_Single.pdf

    Click through and check out page 2, a list of organizations that participated in it. Further on we find:

    Common themes emerged across the boundaries of four working groups that addressed Maine’s Natural Environment; Coastal Environment; Built Environment; and Human and Social Environment. People and Nature presents these within the structure of Strategies and Recommendations, and the reader is referred to that full report for a detailed account. This synthesis addresses seven broad areas to illustrate the interrelations, interdependencies and continuities.

  9. Joel Martin on May 10, 2013 2:47 PM

    I’m sure we can come up thousands of “worthwhile” spending projects. Right now is not a time to increase state spending. It’s in the hole more than 17 billion dollars. That debt amounts to more than 13 thousand dollars per man, woman, and child. Besides, why another such study when there are many underway, if not in the state of Maine?

  10. David Sylvester on May 10, 2013 3:32 PM

    http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/opinion/jack-kelly/jack-kelly-is-global-warming-a-hoax-682727/

  11. Dirigo Blue on May 10, 2013 5:47 PM

    What you consider a “spending project” may be of great import to a town whose sewage treatment plant may be put underwater by rising sea levels or higher storm surges. Zoning officials in coastal towns may want to think about requiring new construction methods in areas that may be prone to future flooding, or not allowing new construction at all.

    Studies done in other states have little bearing on the infrastructure needs of Maine. Does Connecticut have 13 foot tides? Does Florida?

    Identifying potential threats and possible solutions is the smart thing to do, but doesn’t automatically lead to funded projects.

    Of course, my initial comment was in regards to Robinson’s smear piece, which states that Democrats want to further study climate change, which is not the case. Most Democrats accept the climate change is happening, and the prudent thing is to plan for it until it can be reversed.

  12. John ODonnell on May 10, 2013 7:17 PM

    Exactly true. We need to continue to ask people to look up. Discussing climate change without talking about the 100’s of flights above us daily, and the increasing poisoning of our land, food, and wildlife with aluminum and barium is not acceptable.

  13. Ted Ostroff on May 10, 2013 10:32 PM

    Wool, lighten up bro. We all agree. But, life is fleeting.

  14. Ted Ostroff on May 10, 2013 10:32 PM

    Come to visit> molest and xray big deal.

  15. Ted Ostroff on May 10, 2013 10:32 PM

    You can do this pal

Leave A Reply

Subscribe to Substack
Recent News

Celebrated Democrat NGO Leader Lists Million Dollar Maine McMansion for Sale After Homeland Security, House Oversight Probe His Migrant Agency

January 6, 2026

Auburn Bail Check Leads to Seizure of a Variety of Drugs and Firearms

January 6, 2026

Tucker Carlson Grateful Trump’s Maduro Operation Wasn’t Total Regime Change

January 6, 2026

Mills to Deliver Final State of the State as Costs Squeeze Mainers

January 6, 2026

Intoxicated Rumford Man Pepper-Sprays Woman, Three Children Inside Apartment

January 6, 2026
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.