The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Feds Charge Seven Chinese Nationals in Bay State Drug, Money Laundering, Smuggling Scheme
  • Lewiston Police Arrest Man for Possession of Sexually Explicit Material of a Child Under 12
  • Anti-ICE Activists Charged in Alleged Plot to Ambush Federal Officers, Shooting a Police Officer
  • Maine Supreme Court Reviewing Shenna Bellows’ Wording of Voter ID Referendum Question
  • Trump Strikes a Blow to Climate Agenda With Order Ending Subsidies for Solar, Wind, and Other ‘Renewables’
  • Murder Rap Catches Up to Maryland Fugitive Hiding in Auburn, Maine: U.S. Marshals
  • Laurel Libby’s Lawsuit Against Maine Speaker of the House Declared Moot After Her Rights Were Restored
  • Marine Patrol, Coast Guard Search for Missing Augusta Man Who Tried to Rescue His Dog in the Kennebec River
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Wednesday, July 9
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Commentary » Democrats Quick to Attack Balanced Budget Amendment
Commentary

Democrats Quick to Attack Balanced Budget Amendment

Patrick MarvinBy Patrick MarvinMarch 27, 2015Updated:March 27, 20151 Comment4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

With voters last November resoundingly supporting fiscally conservative candidates who campaigned on reducing government spending, Democrats would be wise to recognize the message sent at ballot boxes across Maine: Cut government waste.

At the very least, Democrats would be smart to remain open-minded to ideas and proposals that limit excessive and unnecessary spending.

Sadly, that doesn’t seem to be happening.

Yesterday, Governor LePage and Senate President Mike Thibodeau (R-Winterport) hosted a press conference with likely Presidential candidate Ohio Governor John Kasich, where they spoke about amending the U.S. constitution to require a balanced federal budget.

A balanced budget amendment would simply require the federal government not to spend more money than it collects in any particular budget.

However, before the press conference had even begun, the Maine Democratic Party, and other liberal groups in Maine, had already started attacking the idea of a balanced federal budget and shooting down the proposal.

Phil Bartlett, chairman of the Maine Democratic Party, called the idea a “reckless proposal that would take our country in the wrong direction and cripple our economic security, especially during a recession.”

The Maine Democratic Party even highlighted an article by the liberal Washington Post, which called the concept of a balanced budget amendment “the worst idea in Washington.”

Not only are Bartlett and the Democratic Party wrong about the U.S. still being in a recession (it formally ended in 2009) but they are also completely off the mark in classifying a balanced budget amendment as a reckless proposal.

Requiring the budget to be balanced has serious benefits, as it prevents hardworking taxpayers from taking on unnecessary and unneeded debt. It limits the size and scope of government, and provides assurance that future generations will have every opportunity to thrive and succeed.

Annual federal spending is growing at an ever increasing rate, and there seems to be no end to the recklessness in sight. Americans clearly need to limit the federal government’s ability to spend above our means and jeopardize our financial future.

As many conservatives acknowledge, a balanced budget amendment is not the end all solution to our economic troubles. It provides no inherient mechanism that prevents wasteful spending, and merely mandates that if the federal government wants to spend more, it needs to raise taxes.

But nonetheless, it would still provide another obstacle to destructive fiscal policies, and would be an improvement over the current system, where budgets often increase the national debt, and rarely balance.

Although there are several exceptions to this rule, federal expenditures have traditionally outweighed revenue because of two types of events – wars, and recessions.

As the Democrats are quick to point out, during a recession, revenue sharply decreases, while expenditures generally stay the same or increase.

Not only does this observation invite the obvious solution of simply cutting government expenditures to prevent running a deficit, but this conundrum could also be solved by the use of a “rainy day fund.”

As the Manhattan Institute explained in testimony to Congress, rather than turning to increased debt during economic downturns, it would be much more prudent to draw funds from a rainy day fund that could be filled during times of economic prosperity.

Additionally, during rare times of war, the balanced budget requirement could be suspended to guarantee America has every tool necessary to protect its national security.

Also, counter to the claims made by the Democrats, balancing the budget is not an impossible feat. In fact, in 2013, a class of college students at the University of Georgia drafted a balanced budget on their own, and created a plan for America that does not run a deficit.

Maine itself has even had a constitutional requirement for a balanced budget since it became a state in 1820. Despite all of the difficulties in crafting and passing a budget in Maine, you’d be hard-pressed to find anyone who would call Maine’s balanced budget requirement “reckless.”

Given the Democratic Party’s clear desire to ignore the calls for financial responsibility, let’s just hope they don’t target Maine’s balanced budget requirement next.

balanced budget amendment debt deficit Featured federal budget Governor john Kasich Maine Ohio spending
Previous ArticleSenate and House Republicans Look to Reconcile Budgets
Next Article Congressman Poliquin Pushes Back Against Shady FDIC Practices
Patrick Marvin

Patrick Marvin is a former Policy Analyst for The Maine Heritage Policy Center. He holds a Masters Degree from the University of New Hampshire, and has an extensive background in analysis and research.

Subscribe to Substack

Related Posts

(Screen Capture: PBS News Hour)

TRENT ENGLAND And JASON SNEAD: Time To Say Goodbye To Ranked Choice Voting

July 8, 2025

Bowdoin Graduate Zohran Mamdani and the Echoes of David Duke: Josh Filler

July 5, 2025

“What the F*&%!?” Janet Mills Freaks Out When Questioned Over Cocaine Use

July 4, 2025

<span class="dsq-postid" data-dsqidentifier="10055 http://www.themainewire.com/?p=10055">1 Comment

  1. John Martin on March 28, 2015 5:52 PM

    of course it is reckless

Leave A Reply

Subscribe to Substack
Recent News

Feds Charge Seven Chinese Nationals in Bay State Drug, Money Laundering, Smuggling Scheme

July 8, 2025

Lewiston Police Arrest Man for Possession of Sexually Explicit Material of a Child Under 12

July 8, 2025

Anti-ICE Activists Charged in Alleged Plot to Ambush Federal Officers, Shooting a Police Officer

July 8, 2025

Maine Supreme Court Reviewing Shenna Bellows’ Wording of Voter ID Referendum Question

July 8, 2025

Trump Strikes a Blow to Climate Agenda With Order Ending Subsidies for Solar, Wind, and Other ‘Renewables’

July 8, 2025
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.