The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Clinton Farmers Gather Signatures Needed to Put Food Sovereignty on Town Meeting Agenda
  • Pres. Trump Orders Flags Flown at Half-Staff for Through Saturday in Honor of Sen. Lindsey Graham
  • Protection Order Controversy Forces Portland Council Candidate Out of Race
  • Driver Killed After Allegedly Attempting to Run Over ICE Agents in Biddeford; Loud Protests Erupt
  • Bangor Homeless Man Arrested After Breaking In to Eight Cars
  • Portland Press Herald Jumps The Gun On Biddeford ICE Shooting, Proving Incompetence Has No Bounds
  • Biddeford ICE-Involved Shooting Leaves Driver Dead; Investigation Underway
  • Limerick Man Arrested After Allegedly Ramming State Police Cruiser, Fleeing into New Hampshire
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Tuesday, July 14
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
The Maine Wire
Home » News » National » Obama Likely to Use Veto to Help Unions
National

Obama Likely to Use Veto to Help Unions

Patrick MarvinBy Patrick MarvinMarch 20, 2015No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

On Thursday, Congress passed a resolution aimed at limiting so-called “ambush elections” for union representation, but the legislation is expected to be vetoed by President Obama with the fourth veto of his Presidency.

The Congressional resolution, which was spear-headed by the GOP, would overturn a new union rule that greatly expedites the process for electing union representation.

Currently, unions are forced to wait 25 days after filing a petition before they can hold a representation election. The new rule, which was enacted by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) last year and is set to take effect next month, would nearly halve the current wait time, and allow unions to hold an election just two weeks after filing.

Opponents of the new rule assert that it would put businesses at a great disadvantage, and limit their ability to hold discussions, express their views, and encourage a debate regarding unionization.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, one of the most vocal opponents, said in a statement that the rule “ignores both employers’ free speech rights and significantly impacts employees’ freedom of choice.”

“The new rule will stack the deck against employers while depriving employees of information they need to make a rational choice regarding unionization.”

To stop the rule, Congress resorted to using the Congressional Review Act, a seldom-used tool that allows legislators to block any regulation from going into effect.

Rep. Phil Roe (R-Tenn), one of the sponsors of the bill, charged that the “Obama administration’s activist NLRB” has now “put the interests of labor unions before those of job creators and American workers.”

The NRLB countered that the new rule represents the agency “modernizing its rules in light of modern technology, making its procedures more transparent and uniform across regions, and eliminating unnecessary litigation and delay.”

Labor groups have also come out in support of the new rule, with the AFL-CIO saying in a statement that the rule will “help reduce delay in the process and make it easier for workers to vote on forming a union in a timely manner.”

“We commend the NLRB’s efforts to streamline the process and reduce unnecessary delay.”

If Obama does veto the bill, it would be the second time he has used his veto power since Republicans took control of the Senate this year.

Featured NLRB Obama rule unions veto
Previous ArticleWhy Maine Cannot Afford a Minimum Wage Increase
Next Article Poliquin: ObamaCare Continues to Hurt Mainers
Patrick Marvin

Patrick Marvin is a former Policy Analyst for The Maine Heritage Policy Center. He holds a Masters Degree from the University of New Hampshire, and has an extensive background in analysis and research.

Latest News

Clinton Farmers Gather Signatures Needed to Put Food Sovereignty on Town Meeting Agenda

July 14, 2026

Pres. Trump Orders Flags Flown at Half-Staff for Through Saturday in Honor of Sen. Lindsey Graham

July 14, 2026

Protection Order Controversy Forces Portland Council Candidate Out of Race

July 14, 2026

Comments are closed.

Recent News

Clinton Farmers Gather Signatures Needed to Put Food Sovereignty on Town Meeting Agenda

July 14, 2026

Pres. Trump Orders Flags Flown at Half-Staff for Through Saturday in Honor of Sen. Lindsey Graham

July 14, 2026

Protection Order Controversy Forces Portland Council Candidate Out of Race

July 14, 2026

Bangor Homeless Man Arrested After Breaking In to Eight Cars

July 13, 2026

Biddeford ICE-Involved Shooting Leaves Driver Dead; Investigation Underway

July 13, 2026
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.