The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • About
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Maine Wire TV: Gary Drinkwater and Heidi Sampson on School Vaccine Mandates and Education Reform
  • Question A Helps Fix the Mess Socialists Made in Portland
  • Pro-Life Group Thinks Mills’ Late-Term Abortion Bill Lacks Votes to Pass
  • House Dems Vote Against Letting Healthcare Workers Who Refused COVID-19 Jabs Return to Jobs
  • Portland Police Seize 67 Grams of Fentanyl in Arrest
  • NYC Mayor Says City Considering Housing Asylum Seekers in ‘Private Residences’
  • Notorious Cold War Spy Dies In Prison
  • Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows Claims Credible Threat Made Against Her Life on Social Media
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Login
Tuesday, June 6
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • About
  • Contact
The Maine Wire
Home » News » How lawmakers can add much-needed transparency to the ballot initiative process
News

How lawmakers can add much-needed transparency to the ballot initiative process

Jacob PosikBy Jacob PosikFebruary 25, 2019Updated:March 1, 2019No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Lawmakers on the Veterans and Legal Affairs Committee will hold a public hearing today on LD 294, sponsored by Rep. Josh Morris, a bill that would require the state to print the estimated cost of a citizen’s initiative directly on the ballot.

In recent years, Mainers have been asked to approve several ballot questions that created new programs without being provided information about the cost of the measures. Mainers who do not normally engage in politics typically see only the ballot question – a carefully worded yes or no question – before casting their vote, which unfortunately gives voters only a surface level understanding of the policy question at hand.

For example, in 2016, Maine voters approved Question 1 to legalize recreational marijuana, but the question did not mention the costs the state would incur to establish the program, or the legislative time and money it would take to come to an agreement on implementing a regulatory framework.

In 2017, Mainers approved Question 2, Medicaid expansion, but were not told how much it would cost annually to expand coverage under the program. The question read:

“Do you want Maine to expand Medicaid to provide healthcare coverage for qualified adults under age 65 with incomes at or below 138% of the federal poverty level, which in 2017 means $16,643 for a single person and $22,412 for a family of two?”

Any reasonable person reading this question is left to believe expansion going to help Mainers in poverty get ahead by providing them “free” health care. But if a fiscal impact estimate were provided, it would have shown that Medicaid expansion was estimated to cost approximately $54.5 million annually according to the Office of Fiscal and Program Review. What would the outcome have been had Maine voters known the price tag in advance of casting their vote?

It’s common for people to change their mind about things – particularly questions of public policy – when they’re given all of the information necessary to make an educated decision, which is why an additional layer of transparency would benefit Maine’s ballot initiative process.  When the public was recently polled about their support or opposition to a Medicare for All plan, 56 percent said they would support the plan and 42 percent opposed it. When more information was given about the tax burden most Americans would bear as a result of implementation, support for Medicare for All plummeted to 37 percent.

While this poll is not specific to the many policy questions Maine voters have seen in recent years, it does reflect how individuals react when information about the fiscal impact of a measure is provided. The difference in opinion reflects the power of transparency, especially when the general public is the deciding body in lawmaking through the ballot initiative process.

In addition, other states have taken steps to provide similar levels of transparency to voters at the ballot box. Similar to Maine, many states require fiscal impact statements to be produced for every ballot question and provide digests and summaries in newspapers and voter pamphlets, while others print fiscal impact statements directly on the ballot.

Maine can do more than publishing information about an initiative’s fiscal impact online and in the Citizen’s Guide to the Referendum Election; it should be printed on every ballot so Mainers undoubtedly know the impact of an initiative when making their decision.

Critics of LD 294 will likely cite the cost of printing additional ballot pages as a downside to this proposal. However, these costs can be avoided by simply printing a summary of an initiative’s fiscal impact instead of the full fiscal impact statement (typically a page). A brief summary denoting the net cost or savings to the state would suffice.

This information should only require a line or two of additional text on the ballot per question, or could be included in the question itself, eliminating the excessive costs of printing an entire fiscal impact statement.

Even the editorial team at the Bangor Daily News has endorsed this crucial reform, albeit halfheartedly.

Printing summaries of the fiscal impact of an initiative directly on the ballot is most transparent method of providing this information to voters, and it is the only way we can ensure voters have this information while casting their vote. Lawmakers should pass LD 294 to provide this critical layer of transparency to the electorate.

ballot initiative ballot initiative reform citizen's initiative Commentary Featured Opinion transparency
Previous ArticleIt shouldn’t be so hard to earn a living in Maine
Next Article Vehicle inspections do not make our roads safer
Jacob Posik

Jacob Posik, of Turner, is the director of communications at Maine Policy Institute. He formerly served as a policy analyst at Maine Policy and editor of The Maine Wire. Posik can be reached at jposik@mainepolicy.org.

Related Posts

Pro-Life Group Thinks Mills’ Late-Term Abortion Bill Lacks Votes to Pass

June 6, 2023

House Dems Vote Against Letting Healthcare Workers Who Refused COVID-19 Jabs Return to Jobs

June 6, 2023

Portland Police Seize 67 Grams of Fentanyl in Arrest

June 6, 2023

Leave A Reply

Recent News

Maine Wire TV: Gary Drinkwater and Heidi Sampson on School Vaccine Mandates and Education Reform

June 6, 2023

Question A Helps Fix the Mess Socialists Made in Portland

June 6, 2023

Pro-Life Group Thinks Mills’ Late-Term Abortion Bill Lacks Votes to Pass

June 6, 2023

House Dems Vote Against Letting Healthcare Workers Who Refused COVID-19 Jabs Return to Jobs

June 6, 2023

Portland Police Seize 67 Grams of Fentanyl in Arrest

June 6, 2023
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login below or Register Now.

Lost password?

Register Now!

Already registered? Login.

A password will be e-mailed to you.