The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • About
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Mills’ Late-Term Abortion Bill Gets Last Minute Work Session for Thursday Afternoon
  • Maine Republicans Score Tentative Victory in Delaying Trans Trafficking Bill
  • Lawmakers Nix Public School Transparency Bill Favored by Bipartisan Majority of Mainers
  • Asylum Seekers Staying in Sanford Inn Will Soon Have to Find Another Place To Stay
  • Chellie Pingree Says “No One Is Coming For Your Gas Stove” But Daughter Hannah Pingree Disagrees
  • New England Energy Prices Have Increased as Demand Has Declined Due to Climate Policies, Report Finds
  • Gardiner High School Implements Controversial New “American Flag Only” Policy Following Student Clash
  • Taxes in Portland Could Rise by 10 Percent If State Declines to Help With Asylum Seeker Crisis: WGME
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Login
Wednesday, June 7
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • About
  • Contact
The Maine Wire
Home » News » A local option sales tax would not help the average Maine town or taxpayer
News

A local option sales tax would not help the average Maine town or taxpayer

Jacob PosikBy Jacob PosikDecember 2, 2019Updated:December 2, 2019No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

The Maine Heritage Policy Center on Monday released a new policy brief, “A Lost Cause: The Local-Option Sales Tax.” The analysis examines LD 1254, a carry-over bill that would allow municipalities to enact by local referendum a one percent local option sales tax (LOST) on meals and lodging sales within their jurisdictions. The bill will be considered when lawmakers return to Augusta in January for the second session of the 129th Legislature.

When LD 1254 was first considered by lawmakers earlier this year, a number of Augusta politicians and local officials made promises about how a local option sales tax would improve local services and reduce property taxes. However, the report released Monday casts serous doubt on these claims.

In the brief, MHPC explores the impact of LOSTs on low-income Mainers and dissects how the imposition of a LOST would alter consumer behavior to hurt Maine businesses.

First, few municipalities have a lot to benefit from the imposition of a LOST. For example, if all municipalities in Maine implemented a broad-based LOST of one percent, 10 municipalities would generate roughly 42% of all LOST revenue generated statewide. Meanwhile, 356 jurisdictions, or 70 percent of all municipalities, would generate revenue under $100,000.  

Similarly, imposing a LOST specifically on meals and lodging would do little to help the average municipality. Here, too, the revenues would be concentrated to a small number of service centers. Based on 2018 meals and lodging sales data from Maine Revenue Services, the LOST within LD 1254 would generate $38.4 million in new revenue if enacted statewide.

Ten municipalities – Portland, Bangor, South Portland, Bar Harbor, Ogunquit, York, Wells, Augusta, Scarborough and Auburn – would generate approximately 45 percent of that revenue.

In addition, what has been the lost in the ongoing debate is how an increase in the sales tax hurts struggling Mainers the most. The lowest 20 percent of income earners in Maine pay an effective sales and excise tax rate of 6.1 percent. Maine’s top earners pay just 0.7 percent. Any increase to the sales tax hurts low-income Mainers far more than those who are economically secure.

In 2017, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated 12.9 percent of Mainers live in poverty. Interestingly, six of the 10 municipalities that have the most to gain from a broad-based LOST – Auburn, Augusta, Bangor, Biddeford, Portland and Waterville – have poverty rates that exceed the state average. For example, Augusta and Bangor had poverty rates of 21 percent and 22.6 percent, respectively, in 2017.

While these municipalities could raise hefty sums from a LOST, they would do so on the backs of their poorest residents. Sales taxes are regressive and punish those who already struggle to make ends meet in Maine, and this is no different with a LOST.

Perhaps most troubling is the effect a LOST would have on Maine businesses. Imposing a LOST in Maine would further incentivize cross-border consumption. Research shows that as long as consumers are within a reasonable commuting distance (31 to 38 miles), LOSTS increase cross-border shopping from high-tax jurisdictions to low-tax jurisdictions by 10 to 14 percent.

Worse, Maine border counties already struggle to compete with New Hampshire Border Counties. Because New Hampshire does not levy a sales tax, businesses in Maine border counties lose customers to their counterparts in the Granite State. Per capita retail sales in New Hampshire border counties ($19,644) outperform per capita retail sales in Maine border counties ($11,962) by nearly $7,700 per person. Establishing a LOST in Maine would only grow this disparity.

And while LOST proponents claim the tax is a way to offload the state’s tax burden on tourists, our citizens pay for these services as well. According to Maine Revenue Services, about 70 percent of meals sales and 30 percent of lodging sales are paid for by Mainers. Proponents also claim that the revenue generated by a LOST would help reduce municipal property tax burdens. However, nothing within existing state law or the language of LD 1254 requires municipalities to offset or reduce property tax collections by establishing a LOST.

In other words, there is no guarantee the revenue it generates would provide meaningful property tax relief in the jurisdictions that enact them.

The full brief can be read here.

Commentary Featured LD 1254 local option sales tax Opinion property tax property taxes state and local taxes tax burden tax policy Taxes
Previous ArticleLaw, oaths and the truth
Next Article How to fix Maine’s transportation funding shortfall
Jacob Posik

Jacob Posik, of Turner, is the director of communications at Maine Policy Institute. He formerly served as a policy analyst at Maine Policy and editor of The Maine Wire. Posik can be reached at jposik@mainepolicy.org.

Related Posts

Mills’ Late-Term Abortion Bill Gets Last Minute Work Session for Thursday Afternoon

June 7, 2023

Maine Republicans Score Tentative Victory in Delaying Trans Trafficking Bill

June 7, 2023

Lawmakers Nix Public School Transparency Bill Favored by Bipartisan Majority of Mainers

June 7, 2023

Leave A Reply

Recent News

Mills’ Late-Term Abortion Bill Gets Last Minute Work Session for Thursday Afternoon

June 7, 2023

Maine Republicans Score Tentative Victory in Delaying Trans Trafficking Bill

June 7, 2023

Lawmakers Nix Public School Transparency Bill Favored by Bipartisan Majority of Mainers

June 7, 2023

Asylum Seekers Staying in Sanford Inn Will Soon Have to Find Another Place To Stay

June 7, 2023

Chellie Pingree Says “No One Is Coming For Your Gas Stove” But Daughter Hannah Pingree Disagrees

June 7, 2023
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login below or Register Now.

Lost password?

Register Now!

Already registered? Login.

A password will be e-mailed to you.