The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Investigations
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Topsham Felon Found with 14 Firearms Arrested During Drug Investigation
  • Queen City Clash: Maine Wire Editor-in-Chief Steve Robinson Grills GOP Gov Candidates in Bangor Debate
  • Eight GOP Candidates Set to Face Off in Maine Wire Gubernatorial Debate Tonight
  • Lewiston Councilor’s Cease Harassment Notice Voided After Police Review
  • The Primary Ends. Unity Begins.
  • Brewer School Department Settles in First-Amendment Lawsuit from Conservative Activist Shawn McBreairty Who Died by Suicide During Proceedings
  • BIW Designers’ Union Heads to Strike After Contract Talks Break Down
  • U.S. Senate Confirms Markwayne Mullin as Homeland Security Secretary in 54–45 Vote
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Wednesday, March 25
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Investigations
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Energy & Environment » Another Offshore Wind Project Scuttled as Maine Charges Forward with Mills’ “Roadmap”
Energy & Environment

Another Offshore Wind Project Scuttled as Maine Charges Forward with Mills’ “Roadmap”

Steve RobinsonBy Steve RobinsonNovember 1, 2023Updated:November 1, 20234 Comments3 Mins Read1K Views
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

An international wind power company is pulling the plug on a major offshore wind development favored by the Biden Administration, the most recent in a series of offshore wind deals that have soured off the Atlantic Coast.

Ørsted, the world’s largest offshore wind power developer, announced the following this week: “US offshore wind projects have experienced further negative developments from adverse impacts relating to supply chains, increased interest rates, and the lack of an OREC (Offshore Renewable Energy Certificate) adjustment on Sunrise Wind…”

That combination of headwinds means the Danish energy company will be forced to scrap development on two wind power developments off the coast of New Jersey. 

[RELATED: Offshore Wind Projects Facing High Costs and Delays Amid Industry Crisis…]

The company’s reported decent financial health, but that was overshadowed by substantial impairment losses totaling DKK 28.4 billion, primarily due to setbacks in its U.S. offshore projects.

The largest chunk, DKK 19.9 billion, was attributed to the Ocean Wind 1 project. These losses led to a net deficit of DKK -19.9 billion, and a return on capital employed (ROCE) at -14%. Excluding these losses, net profit and ROCE stood at DKK 8.5 billion and 13%, respectively.

In other words, Ørsted’s U.S. wind power projects are swimming in red ink.

And they’re not the only ones.

[RELATED: CMP Parent Company Pulls Plug on Mass Offshore Wind…]

Earlier this year, Avangrid, the parent company of Central Maine Power, decided to cease operations off the coast of Massachusetts on its “Commonwealth Wind” project.

The project became so unprofitable that it made better financial sense for Avangrid to pay a $48 million cancellation fee rather that proceed with construction.

At the time, Shell and Ocean Winds North America were seeking similar arrangements for their offshore wind deals.

The developments in offshore wind economics are of great importance to Maine voters and taxpayers, as Gov. Janet Mills has made pushing for offshore wind the cornerstone of her administrations energy policy.

[RELATED: Environmentalists Blast Offshore Wind as 69th Dead Whale in Less than Year Found Dead on Atlantic Coast…]

In one of the biggest policy fights of the most recent legislative session, Democratic lawmakers secured a deal to construct a large port on the Maine coast that will serve as the construction headquarters for offshore wind operations in the Gulf of Maine.

[RELATED: Fishermen’s Alliance Highlights Offshore Wind Threat to Haddock, Lobster Fisheries in Gulf of Maine…]

The plan has met with heavy resistance from groups that represent Maine fishermen and consumer advocates who claim that it will increase the cost of energy while providing little discernible environmental benefits.

Previous ArticleThree-Month MDEA Investigation Culminates in Sabattus Meth Bust
Next Article Investigations Required After Failures That Led to Lewiston Shooting: 10 Questions That Need Answers
Steve Robinson
  • Twitter

Steve Robinson is the Editor-in-Chief of The Maine Wire. ‪He can be reached by email at [email protected].

Latest News

Topsham Felon Found with 14 Firearms Arrested During Drug Investigation

March 25, 2026

Queen City Clash: Maine Wire Editor-in-Chief Steve Robinson Grills GOP Gov Candidates in Bangor Debate

March 25, 2026

Lewiston Councilor’s Cease Harassment Notice Voided After Police Review

March 24, 2026
0 0 votes
Article Rating
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jake
Jake
2 years ago

There is a perfect place for a Nuclear Power Plant or two in Wiscasset! Much better, safe and clean!

0
Gordon
Gordon
2 years ago

None of the offshore wind projects should be built given the damage they will do to fishing grounds, wale and bird habitats. After spending hundreds of millions to build the wind farms they are still unreliable intermittent power sources that literally depend on weather to generate power. Reliable power sources produce power 24/7/365 regardless of weather conditions.

1
Pem Schaeffer
Pem Schaeffer
2 years ago

Does the term “irrational exuberance” ring any bells?

Or Bud Light trying to force Dylan Mulvaney moral values on American Beer Drinkers?

“Historians of the future will have a hard time figuring out how so many organized groups of strident jackasses succeeded in leading us around by the nose and morally intimidating the majority into silence.”
 Thomas Sowell

From a Thomas Sowell column:

This is ultimately not about the environment but about egos. As T.S. Eliot said, more than fifty years ago: “Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don’t mean to do harm — but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves.”

0
Ken Capron
Ken Capron
2 years ago

By the way – you know those floating wind turbines that UMO is supposedly testing – someone else already did that almost a decade ago. Where does UMO get off in plagiarizing something that is already patented? If it’s wind we want to harness, Congress is a reliable source, and every state has a high flow source in their capitol.

1
Recent News

Topsham Felon Found with 14 Firearms Arrested During Drug Investigation

March 25, 2026

Queen City Clash: Maine Wire Editor-in-Chief Steve Robinson Grills GOP Gov Candidates in Bangor Debate

March 25, 2026

Lewiston Councilor’s Cease Harassment Notice Voided After Police Review

March 24, 2026

Brewer School Department Settles in First-Amendment Lawsuit from Conservative Activist Shawn McBreairty Who Died by Suicide During Proceedings

March 24, 2026

BIW Designers’ Union Heads to Strike After Contract Talks Break Down

March 24, 2026
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

wpDiscuz