The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Maine Agency Quickly Scrubs Discriminatory Hiring Quotas After Trump Admin Threat
  • Attorneys General of 15 States Back Rep. Libby in Amicus Brief, While AG Frey Urges SCOTUS to Deny Her Appeal
  • Trump Admin Freezes Maine Wildlife Agency’s Funds Over ‘Sex-Based’ Hiring Policy
  • Committee Rejects Three Proposals to Regulate Marijuana Industry, But One Targeting Organized Crime Remains on the Table
  • Student Tip Leads to Lockdown, Arrest of Armed Man Near Biddeford High School
  • Sen. Collins Announces $8.5 Million Federal Grant for Non-Profit Helping Victims of the Lewiston Shooting
  • China, Maine Trio Busted for String of Copper Cable Thefts Across Lincoln County
  • Another Maine School District Removes Pro-Trans Policy after Overwhelming Board Vote
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Sunday, May 11
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Commentary » Hampden voters right to reject $4.5 million bond to establish municipal-owned broadband network
Commentary

Hampden voters right to reject $4.5 million bond to establish municipal-owned broadband network

Nick MurrayBy Nick MurrayNovember 4, 2021Updated:November 4, 2021No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

This past election day, Mainers faced two contentious statewide ballot questions, but many local initiatives faced the scrutiny of voters as well.

Residents of Hampden, a town of around 7,500 near Bangor, were asked to weigh in on a proposal to bond $4.5 million dollars to build a government-owned network (GON) tasked with delivering fiber-optic broadband service to the town.

According to preliminary results from the Bangor Daily News, voters rejected the proposal, with 1407 voting “No” and 981 voting for it.

Maine Civic Action (MCA), a new sister organization of Maine Policy Institute, worked to reach voters through multiple channels and spread the word about the potential costs of adopting a GON in Hampden.

MCA’s campaign highlighted the dreadful track record of municipal GONs around the nation, the unintended consequences of potentially over-building infrastructure in a town currently served by eight internet service providers (ISPs), as well as the cost of the project beyond the initial $4.5 million sticker price. 

According to Broadband Now, only 200 Hampden internet consumers have access to only one provider. Internet service provider Charter has said that it only considers about 325 houses unserved. The company has also said that it will build out fiber-to-the-home infrastructure at no cost to the town in order to serve those residents.

Including interest, the bond would have cost nearly $7 million to add to the town’s existing $7.6 million debt.

In order to pay for itself in 20 years, the backers of the question estimated that the project would need to attract 938 customers annually. What would have happened if it didn’t meet that goal? How much more would Hampden taxpayers be on the hook for in the future? 

Thankfully, we won’t have to find out the answer because 59% of voters decided that the potential benefits of the project do not outweigh the costs.

As Maine towns and counties look for ways to spend their disbursements of federal money from the American Rescue Plan Act, local officials and voters should be wary of wasting it on unneeded government-owned internet service like those defeated in Hampden, but accepted in Knox County this summer.

ballot initiative ballot question broadband broadband infrastructure broadband investment Charter Commentary Featured GON government-owned network Hampden ISP local initiative Opinion rural broadband
Previous ArticleThe Mills administration’s reliance on (political) science
Next Article Maine healthcare workers face uncertain future amid state and federal vaccine mandates
Nick Murray
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Nick Murray, a resident of Poland, currently serves as Director of Policy with Maine Policy Institute, developing MPI's policy research, analysis, and strategic advocacy priorities. He is the author of numerous articles and publications such as the 50-State Emergency Powers Scorecard, Long-Term Growth vs. Short-Term Gimmicks: Maine's Economy and Gov. Mills' Second Biennial Budget, Sticker Shock: Maine's Burdensome Vehicle Inspection Mandate, and COVID Catastrophe: the Consequences of Societal Shutdowns.

Related Posts

Chaos & Crowns: Are Pageants Still Relevant?

May 9, 2025

Now Too Infirm to Think Straight, Biden Still Believes He’s Cicero – and the Portland Press Herald Thinks Chuck Grassley is the Problem

May 8, 2025

As a Senator, Shenna Bellows Voted to Make Ballot Questions Straightforward – But as Secretary of State, She Ignores the Law She Once Supported

May 7, 2025

Leave A Reply

Recent News

Attorneys General of 15 States Back Rep. Libby in Amicus Brief, While AG Frey Urges SCOTUS to Deny Her Appeal

May 10, 2025

Trump Admin Freezes Maine Wildlife Agency’s Funds Over ‘Sex-Based’ Hiring Policy

May 9, 2025

Committee Rejects Three Proposals to Regulate Marijuana Industry, But One Targeting Organized Crime Remains on the Table

May 9, 2025

Student Tip Leads to Lockdown, Arrest of Armed Man Near Biddeford High School

May 9, 2025

Sen. Collins Announces $8.5 Million Federal Grant for Non-Profit Helping Victims of the Lewiston Shooting

May 9, 2025
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.