The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Tokin’ for the Town: Dem Lawmaker Wants to Allow Maine Municipalities to Tax Adult Use Cannabis to Help Pay for Local Expenses
  • Democrats Opposed to Immigration Enforcement Put Forward Bill to Stop Local Police from Aiding Feds
  • Worcester City Councilor Assaults ICE Officers in Attempt to Prevent Arrest of an Illegal Immigrant Who Assaulted a Pregnant Woman
  • New York Times’ Political Reporter Begs Reddit for Sob Stories About Trump’s Funding Cuts Harming Maine
  • Homeless Man Charged with Arson for Fire that Caused $20,000 in Damage to Bangor Building
  • Chinese Company, Nationals Indicted for Smuggling Pill-Making Equipment into US: DOJ
  • NH High-School Coach Arrested in Maine for Trying to Buy Sex from a 14-Year-Old
  • Dexter Group Gets Enough Signatures for June Ballot Question Calling for the Removal of Two School Board Members Who Say They’re Being Targeted
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Wednesday, May 14
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Commentary » Hampden voters right to reject $4.5 million bond to establish municipal-owned broadband network
Commentary

Hampden voters right to reject $4.5 million bond to establish municipal-owned broadband network

Nick MurrayBy Nick MurrayNovember 4, 2021Updated:November 4, 2021No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

This past election day, Mainers faced two contentious statewide ballot questions, but many local initiatives faced the scrutiny of voters as well.

Residents of Hampden, a town of around 7,500 near Bangor, were asked to weigh in on a proposal to bond $4.5 million dollars to build a government-owned network (GON) tasked with delivering fiber-optic broadband service to the town.

According to preliminary results from the Bangor Daily News, voters rejected the proposal, with 1407 voting “No” and 981 voting for it.

Maine Civic Action (MCA), a new sister organization of Maine Policy Institute, worked to reach voters through multiple channels and spread the word about the potential costs of adopting a GON in Hampden.

MCA’s campaign highlighted the dreadful track record of municipal GONs around the nation, the unintended consequences of potentially over-building infrastructure in a town currently served by eight internet service providers (ISPs), as well as the cost of the project beyond the initial $4.5 million sticker price. 

According to Broadband Now, only 200 Hampden internet consumers have access to only one provider. Internet service provider Charter has said that it only considers about 325 houses unserved. The company has also said that it will build out fiber-to-the-home infrastructure at no cost to the town in order to serve those residents.

Including interest, the bond would have cost nearly $7 million to add to the town’s existing $7.6 million debt.

In order to pay for itself in 20 years, the backers of the question estimated that the project would need to attract 938 customers annually. What would have happened if it didn’t meet that goal? How much more would Hampden taxpayers be on the hook for in the future? 

Thankfully, we won’t have to find out the answer because 59% of voters decided that the potential benefits of the project do not outweigh the costs.

As Maine towns and counties look for ways to spend their disbursements of federal money from the American Rescue Plan Act, local officials and voters should be wary of wasting it on unneeded government-owned internet service like those defeated in Hampden, but accepted in Knox County this summer.

ballot initiative ballot question broadband broadband infrastructure broadband investment Charter Commentary Featured GON government-owned network Hampden ISP local initiative Opinion rural broadband
Previous ArticleThe Mills administration’s reliance on (political) science
Next Article Maine healthcare workers face uncertain future amid state and federal vaccine mandates
Nick Murray
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Nick Murray, a resident of Poland, currently serves as Director of Policy with Maine Policy Institute, developing MPI's policy research, analysis, and strategic advocacy priorities. He is the author of numerous articles and publications such as the 50-State Emergency Powers Scorecard, Long-Term Growth vs. Short-Term Gimmicks: Maine's Economy and Gov. Mills' Second Biennial Budget, Sticker Shock: Maine's Burdensome Vehicle Inspection Mandate, and COVID Catastrophe: the Consequences of Societal Shutdowns.

Related Posts

New York Times’ Political Reporter Begs Reddit for Sob Stories About Trump’s Funding Cuts Harming Maine

May 13, 2025

Should Troy Jackson Worry About Leticia James’ Mortgage Fraud Investigation?

May 12, 2025

Maine’s Crooked Politicians Beware

May 12, 2025

Leave A Reply

Recent News

Tokin’ for the Town: Dem Lawmaker Wants to Allow Maine Municipalities to Tax Adult Use Cannabis to Help Pay for Local Expenses

May 13, 2025

Democrats Opposed to Immigration Enforcement Put Forward Bill to Stop Local Police from Aiding Feds

May 13, 2025

Worcester City Councilor Assaults ICE Officers in Attempt to Prevent Arrest of an Illegal Immigrant Who Assaulted a Pregnant Woman

May 13, 2025

Homeless Man Charged with Arson for Fire that Caused $20,000 in Damage to Bangor Building

May 13, 2025

Chinese Company, Nationals Indicted for Smuggling Pill-Making Equipment into US: DOJ

May 13, 2025
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.