The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Investigations
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Another Hoax Call Causes Lake Region High School Lockdown and Wastes Police Resources
  • Trump Administration to Investigate Maine’s Abortion Laws, Janet Mills Responds
  • The Pastor’s Office Ep.5 – ADDICTION (w/ Guest Paul Trovarello)
  • Bay State Feds Declare War On Public Program Fraud In Formation Of Anti-Fraud Team
  • Glenburn Fugitive Arrested after Fleeing Prison Sentence Following Guilty Plea
  • Mills Campaign Unleashes Emotional Ad Featuring Army Veteran Who Calls Platner ‘Unacceptable’ Over Past Reddit Comments
  • Skowhegan Selectboard Under Fire, Backpedaling After Town Manager’s Suicide Amid Child Sexual-Abuse Probe
  • Living On The Moon And Mars – Maybe. Making Babies? ‘Houston We’ve Got A Problem’
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Friday, March 27
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Investigations
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Education » Will Maine’s DOE overstep its authority in coordinating school reopenings?
Education

Will Maine’s DOE overstep its authority in coordinating school reopenings?

Julia BentleyBy Julia BentleyJune 28, 2020Updated:June 28, 2020No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

On June 11, Maine’s Department of Education (DOE) released a working draft listing a series of recommendations that may be used by schools to aid them in reopening this fall. The list includes a number of common-sense recommendations, such as bolstering efforts to keep student spaces clean, reducing classroom capacity and developing remote curriculum options in the event of a sharp increase in cases.

However, closer scrutiny indicates that the DOE’s method to implement these strategies doesn’t make sense.  

In their working draft, the DOE says that “Maine DOE, in partnership with CDC and MEMA, will determine when it is advisable for schools to begin in-person instruction.” There is no good reason for the DOE to shoulder the responsibility of determining when schools should reopen. This responsibility should belong to local school boards. 

The statutes outlining the responsibilities of school boards already include addressing “exposure to communicable disease” and the development of an annual “comprehensive emergency plan.” Although no one has experience in planning for a pandemic, the logistics of emergency planning and preventing the spread of disease falls under the purview of school boards, not the state DOE.

The DOE’s working draft also stipulates that the decision to return students to school will be predicated on whether there is a regional “downward trajectory” of COVID-19 cases. Broadly applied, this seems like a poor standard for determining when students should return to school. 

In areas where the case count is currently low—such as Washington County where only two cases have been reported, or Aroostook County where there have only been eight reported cases—will there need to be a “downward trajectory” of cases to reopen schools? 

The safety of our school-aged population must be a top priority as we work to re-enroll our students. Recent research indicates that it is imperative for students to go back to school—stalling on re-entry will only lower educational outcomes and threaten the physical and emotional well-being of students. 

The financial woes of parents who need to return to work is also a pressing concern. 

We must be mindful, however, that communities, not state entities, are best equipped to decide when students should return to classrooms.

Luckily, the DOE has noted that this document is a working draft of recommendations, rather than regulations that are set in stone. There is plenty of opportunity for the DOE to revise their plan for reopening and allow school boards to rightfully take over the process.  

Commentary Featured
Previous ArticleMaine must open now
Next Article Experts in apocalyptic harmony
Julia Bentley

As Maine Policy Institute’s newest policy intern, Julia Bentley is excited to research and write about policies that promote freedom and personal responsibility. Julia graduated from John Brown University in 2018, interned with the Heritage Foundation in 2018, and was a fellow at the John Jay Institute in 2019. Her primary policy interests are health, welfare, and education reform, and she is hoping to learn more about how these policy areas are addressed at the state level during her time at Maine Policy Institute.

Latest News

Conservative Augusta School Board Member Vows Not to Support Any Budget Until District follows Title IX and Bars Males from Girls’ Spaces

March 18, 2026

DOJ Sues Harvard for Allegedly Withholding Docs Concerning Compliance with SCOTUS Ban on Race-Conscious Admissions

February 17, 2026

Trump Administration to Resume Garnishing Wages of Defaulted Student Loan Borrowers in 2026

December 24, 2025

Comments are closed.

Recent News

Another Hoax Call Causes Lake Region High School Lockdown and Wastes Police Resources

March 27, 2026

Trump Administration to Investigate Maine’s Abortion Laws, Janet Mills Responds

March 27, 2026

Bay State Feds Declare War On Public Program Fraud In Formation Of Anti-Fraud Team

March 27, 2026

Glenburn Fugitive Arrested after Fleeing Prison Sentence Following Guilty Plea

March 27, 2026

Mills Campaign Unleashes Emotional Ad Featuring Army Veteran Who Calls Platner ‘Unacceptable’ Over Past Reddit Comments

March 27, 2026
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.