The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Investigations
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Platner Pals: New Mexico Senator Shrugs Off Schumer, Joins Platner Endorsement Party
  • Three Skowhegan Residents Arrested With Drugs in Stolen Vehicle
  • Stewart Unveils MaineCare Crackdown, Challenges Democrats to Back Fraud-Fighting Proposal
  • Sen. Angus King Joins Colleagues on Amicus Brief Challenging President Trump’s “Independence Arch”
  • Windham Man Arrested for Domestic Violence After Reports of Shots Fired
  • Wiscasset Man Tries to Set Girlfriend on Fire in Bed, He Faces Arson Charges
  • Clifton Man Found Unconscious with 500 Grams of Drugs After Stopping in The Middle of a Lincoln Road
  • Fraud
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Wednesday, March 11
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Investigations
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
The Maine Wire
Home » News » News » Lewiston Voters to Decide on School Budget That Would Hike Property Taxes 13%
News

Lewiston Voters to Decide on School Budget That Would Hike Property Taxes 13%

Libby PalanzaBy Libby PalanzaJune 10, 2024Updated:June 10, 20248 Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

On Tuesday, Lewiston residents will be asked to weigh in on a proposed school budget for a second time this year.

In May, more than 65 percent of those who turned out to the polls voted to reject the budget as it was then written. Following this vote, Lewiston officials took steps to make more than $1 million in additional cuts.

Even with these reductions, however, the proposal would raise the city’s school property tax rate by nearly 13 percent, increasing the school portion of the mill rate by $1.68 and bringing it to a total of $13.85.

Superintendent Jake Langlais told the Lewiston Sun Journal that if voters reject the budget Tuesday, the district will be forced to “pause hiring, reduce programming, and discontinue other items immediately.”

The Journal went on to report that “Langlais said he is not telling anyone how to vote but he is encouraging people to approve the budget if they support school resources for those in in need, education, summer programming, after school programming, sports, pathways for success, special education programming for high need students, making schools safer and maintaining instruction and support at its current level.”

According to an article published in the Journal last month, the original draft of the budget would have resulted in a property tax rate hike of more than 18 percent.

In its current form, the district’s budget is just under ten percent more expensive than it was last year. This is reportedly the result of higher staffing costs, expenses associated with the Lewiston Regional Technical Center, and new family leave law requirements.

[RELATED: MDOL Now Accepting Public Comment on Proposed Rules for Paid Family and Medical Leave Program]

It was also reported that the cost of sending “students with severe cognitive, physical and/or other disabilities” who cannot be properly supported by the public school system to “special purpose private schools” has increased significantly since last year.

Superintendent Langlais told the Journal earlier this year that in addition to rate hikes for this program, state law now requires that municipalities pay schools for all days, not just those attended by a student, driving up costs even further.

The district pays nearly $15 million to send 133 students to schools outside the district, an expense that Langlais has said the district cannot sustain long term.

The Superintendent also told the Journal at this time that he has proposed a three-year plan for the district to expand its in-house special education program so that the majority of these students could return to the Lewiston Public School system.

The district has also struggled with the coming loss of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) funding.

ESSER was originally launched in the wake of the pandemic and was designed to “address diverse needs arising from or exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, or to emerge stronger post-pandemic, including responding to students’ social, emotional, mental health, and academic needs and continuing to provide educational services as States and school administrative units (SAUs) respond to and recover from the pandemic.”

Late last month, members of the School Committee approved a slate of alterations to the proposed budget in a 5-2 vote.

Most notably, members agreed to use $650,000 from the special education reserve to offset some of the additional costs facing the district next year.

This amendment alone accounted for nearly 58 percent of the reductions advanced at the May 30th meeting.

Lewiston isn’t the only municipality where growing public school budgets are driving property tax increases.

Earlier this year, the Portland City Council approved a school budget accompanied by a 6.6 school property tax increase.

Portland Public Schools explained in a press release that the district originally went into the budgeting process with the expectation of having a $19.4 million shortfall that would have required a 17.41 percent tax increase for resident.

[RELATED: Portland City Council Unanimously Approves School Budget with 6.6% Tax Increase]

The school district went on to say that they were able to reduce their projected costs through “strategic reductions and restructuring.”

Just as in Lewiston, Portland voters will be asked to weigh in on the proposed budget at the ballot box Tuesday.

Previous ArticlePortland Democrat Withdraws from State House Bid Day Before Primary Election
Next Article Mass Migration Spurs Right Turn in European Union Elections
Libby Palanza

Libby Palanza is a reporter for the Maine Wire and a lifelong Mainer. She graduated from Harvard University with a degree in Government and History. She can be reached at [email protected].

Related Posts

Platner Pals: New Mexico Senator Shrugs Off Schumer, Joins Platner Endorsement Party

March 10, 2026

Three Skowhegan Residents Arrested With Drugs in Stolen Vehicle

March 10, 2026

Stewart Unveils MaineCare Crackdown, Challenges Democrats to Back Fraud-Fighting Proposal

March 10, 2026

<span class="dsq-postid" data-dsqidentifier="28523 https://www.themainewire.com/?p=28523">8 Comments

  1. Andy K on June 10, 2024 8:37 PM

    That is what you get, Lewiston, when you allow decades of illegals into your community. Crime and higher taxes to pay for their entitlements. Thank you Obama and Biden. Notice they aren’t invading Martha’s vineyard.

  2. Woodcanoe on June 11, 2024 6:48 AM

    …….”Superintendent Jake Langlais told the Lewiston Sun Journal that if voters reject the budget Tuesday, the district will be forced to “pause hiring, reduce programming, and discontinue other items immediately.”…..

    Awww! That’d be a damn shame. The unions own the schools already, and are the most reliable dem voting bloc in the state. Time to cut the legs out from under them.

  3. S. Strickland on June 11, 2024 6:53 AM

    Huh. Nothing about actual education, only special this, special that. The Lewiston schools are some of the worst in a state that is ranked at the bottom of the country. Lewiston voters shouldn’t give one cent to a failing enterprise.

  4. Gardiner Schneider on June 11, 2024 7:00 AM

    An average of $112,000 to send each of 133 “students” off to fancy reform schools to meet their “needs”? Mais oui.

  5. Jill Herendeen on June 11, 2024 7:37 AM

    This is what you get for allowing regressive taxation. Taxing ppl for the assumed market value of the roof over their head, whether or not those ppl even have incomes, is about as regressive as taxes can get–instead, try taxing the ppl who have all the money. Somehow, we all know you can’t get blood out of a stone, but we’re stuck in this model which assumes it can get money out of ppl who’re barely hanging in there. 3/4 of Americans are living either in poverty or right on the brink–and that was ten years ago; it’s probably a lot worse now. If you want great public schools, ban private schools, make the rich send THEIR kids to the same public schools as everyone else’s kids, and make the rich fund those schools.

  6. Hanover Fiste on June 11, 2024 8:44 AM

    That’s like having a $5000 car payment for a 1980 Yugo. I compared the level of student achievement to a box of turnips. The students rated only slightly higher than the turnips thanks to the millions of tax dollars infused. In fairness I will admit that the turnips were from NH. I am sure the students would have rated much higher if the turnips were from Maine. Sending your kid to ME public school borders on child neglect.

  7. sandy feet on June 11, 2024 9:50 AM

    Vote no and send your kids to privet school

  8. sandy feet on June 11, 2024 11:04 AM

    “ Notice they aren’t invading Martha’s vineyard.”
    So true!!!!
    Thank you Obama for all this.

Recent News

Platner Pals: New Mexico Senator Shrugs Off Schumer, Joins Platner Endorsement Party

March 10, 2026

Three Skowhegan Residents Arrested With Drugs in Stolen Vehicle

March 10, 2026

Stewart Unveils MaineCare Crackdown, Challenges Democrats to Back Fraud-Fighting Proposal

March 10, 2026

Windham Man Arrested for Domestic Violence After Reports of Shots Fired

March 10, 2026

Wiscasset Man Tries to Set Girlfriend on Fire in Bed, He Faces Arson Charges

March 10, 2026
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.