Liberal lawmakers refuse to explain vote against bill to help victims of human sex trade; main stream media ignores

top democrats clean
Senate Majority Leader Troy Jackson, D-Aroostook, House Speaker Mark Eves, D-North Berwick, and Senate President Justin Alfond, D-Portland all voted against a bill to help victims of human trafficking.

Top liberal lawmakers, including Senate President Justin L. Alfond (D-Portland), House Speaker Mark W. Eves (D-North Berwick) and Senate Majority Leader Troy D. Jackson (D-Aroostook),  have refused to explain why Democrats on the Legislative Council voted against a bill to help victims of human sex trafficking.

Maine’s old guard newspapers, despite previously covering the bill, are now refusing to ask questions.

The controversy began on Wednesday, when the Democrat-controlled Legislative Council voted 6-4 on party lines to kill a bill from Rep. Amy F. Volk (R-Scarborough).

Volk had worked on the bill with the Polaris Project, a nonprofit organization dedicated to fighting human trafficking. She said she was inspired to do something after a report by the organization ranked Maine in the bottom half of states for anti-trafficking laws.

The bill would have enabled courts to vacate prostitution charges from the criminal records of victims of sex trafficking. The protection, which is nearly identical to laws 14 other states have, is based on the rationale that the stigma of a prostitution conviction should not dog victims of sex trafficking for the rest of their lives when they had little to no control over their actions.

The Maine Wire reached out to Democratic members of the Executive Council by email, including Senate Assistant Majority Leader Anne M. Haskell (D-Portland), and House Majority Leader Seth A. Berry (D-Bowdoinham), and left additional phone messages with President Alfond, House Speaker Eves, and Majority Leader Jackson. Additional attempts at contact were made via staffers.

None of the Democrats returned emails or calls. None offered any explanation as to why they would vote against an uncontroversial bill to help victims of human sex trafficking.

[RELATED: Partisan Dems block welfare reform, bill to help victims of human trafficking…]

Maine’s old guard media – the Bangor Daily News, MaineToday Media and Maine Public Broadcasting Network – have remained silent on the matter. Although each of those outlets covered Volk’s bill when it was introduced, none have reported on the Democrats’ shocking decision to kill it before it even gets a chance at debate in the Legislature.

At least one liberal interest group has similarly refused to comment.

The Maine League of Women Voters has said it will not be advocating on behalf of victims of human trafficking. In an email to the House GOP Office, League Advocacy Chair Ann Luther said, “I’m sure all of us share Rep. Volk’s concern for human trafficking, but this in not an issue that we follow at the League of Women Voters.”

Calls placed to the League were not returned. Other issues the League has followed include voter ID laws, campaign finance reform, gun control, and global warming.

Penny Morrell, Maine State Director for Concerned Women of America, said sex trafficking is an issue her group is focused on.

“This bill seems like a very good idea and we should do everything we can to make it happen,” said Morrell. “We must not wait and delay it’s implementation, because if we can protect even one woman right now, it is worth the effort.”

“These victims have endured horrific tragedy and deserve our care, compassion and relief,” she said.

Morrell said research has shown that human trafficking is bigger problem than most believe, especially along the I-95 corridor.“It’s a big problem in Maine, and I don’t think the average citizen is aware of it,” she said.

“But these lawmakers must know,” she said. “This is the kind of liberal progressive legislation the Democrats claim to support, so why didn’t they?”

Susan Dench, founder and president of the Informed Women’s Network, called the Democrats’ actions mind-boggling.

“Alfond, Eves and their Democrat pals continue to wage war on – and against – women,” she said. “It boggles the mind to think that they would leave defenseless female victims of human trafficking grappling with rebuilding their lives while supporting comparatively frivolous bills.”

[RELATED: Maine media ignores Democrats’ “War on Women”…]

Rep. Volk has said she intends to appeal the Legislative Council’s decision on Nov. 6. If Democrats decide to kill her bill again, she has the option of asking Gov. Paul LePage to submit the bill on her behalf.

The second session of the legislative term is reserved, per Maine’s Constitution, for emergency measures and budget-related items. Although Democrats did not consider it an emergency to help victims of human trafficking, they did give the thumbs up to several other important items of legislation, including Eves’ bill to expand Medicaid, Rep. Joan Welsh (D-Rockport)’s “An Act to Amend the Law Governing the Collection of Minor Amounts of Property Taxes” and Rep. Lori Fowle (D-Vassalboro)’s “An Act to Allow Fishing Closer to the Fish Ladder on Webber Pond in Vassalboro”.

Perhaps the most unusual item of legislation that Legislative Council did approve on Wednesday is President Alfond’s L.R. 2483: “An Act To Amend the Laws Regarding Special Food and Beverage Taste-testing Event Licenses.”

Alfond’s bill would make it easier for upper-class Mainers to dine on fine cheese at wine-tastings.

Executive Director of Maine’s Christian Civic League Carroll Conley, whose organization has advocated on behalf of Volk’s bill, said he couldn’t understand why Democrats would scuttle a proposal that seems like common-sense.

“I’m bewildered by the fact that Democratic leadership could find an emergency in Justin Alfond’s wine-tasting bill and a previous bill to allow bars to open at 6:00am on St. Patty’s Day,” said Conley. “I don’t know what counts as an emergency in the Democrats’ book, but when they can’t approve of a bill to help victims of sex trafficking, you know you have a problem.”

“At best, it’s extreme partisanship; at worst, it’s hypocrisy,” he said. “Democrats always preach about helping powerless victims – that’s they’re entire rationale for expanding Medicaid – yet they can’t lift a finger to help young girls whose lives have been forever changed by the evils of sex trafficking?”

For more information about Rep. Volk’s bill, see the Polaris Project’s 2013 report about vacating convictions for sex trafficking victims.

To see model legislation similar to Volk’s bill, see the National Conference of Commissioner on Uniform State Law’s 2013 Uniform Act on Prevention of and Remedies for Human Trafficking.

For more information about the problem of human trafficking in Maine, see the National Human Trafficking Resource Center’s 2013 Data Break Down for the State of Maine.

(Editor’s Note: Due to an error of the author, an earlier version of this story indicated that Rep. Jeff McCabe had been contacted.)

Steve Robinson
Maine Wire Reporter


  1. “I’m bewildered by the fact that Democratic leadership could find an emergency in Justin Alfond’s wine-tasting bill and a previous bill to allow bars to open at 6:00am on St. Patty’s Day,” said Conley.

    Hey – it was for the ‘Businessmen’ – you know – the MHPC’s Base. If you had given this any thought, you would have realized that St. Paddy’s day fell on Sunday this year. What time do the bars open on Sunday?? Our Dear Governor sure as hell knows – it’s 9:00am. And what self-respecting psuedo-Irishman is going to wait until the sun is well up to the yard-arm on St. Paddy’s day for a drop of the dew?? But more importantly – the Businessmen were crying in their Suds…..

  2. This story is strange. I cant seem to find a voice mail or email from the author. He says he reached out to me but I cant seem to find it.. I emailed Steve Robinson but have not heard back.

  3. It comes as no surprise to me that the Democrat ‘ leadership’ refuses to comment on, or explain their nonsensical vote against this bill. And they know they have nothing to fear from their enablers in the liberal media. Jeff McCabe is claiming no one contacted him, yet he didn explain his vote in this forum. I challenged him to, but will he? I would like to think so, but I have to wonder if Alfond and Eves have ordered the committee members to remain silent. Irregardless, their vote against this bill is nothing short of disgusting.

  4. I think this represents the typical arrogance of the “leadership” over the past year. Can you imagine someone like Jackson representing YOUR interests in Washington ?? The collective bunch are so out of touch with Mainers .. That is what happens when you listen only to the special interests that stuff your PAC …

  5. Amy Volk’s bill confuses me.

    First, are there victims of sex-trafficking in Maine prisons who’ve been convicted of crimes caused by that fact? At the very least it should be a mitigating factor at trial, if not a complete defense even assuming that one believes that prostitution should be a crime to begin with.

    Second, if such facts were raised and adjudicated at trial, what does this law do? The alleged victim already had the right to a direct appeal and have that issue re-considered. Is it’s intent to set up an extra-judicial appeals process in addition to the one that already exists?

    Or are we talking about people who were so mentally beaten down that they were too afraid or too embarrassed to mention it at their trial or to take a direct appeal and now, after they’ve found themselves in prison, they want a chance to have their circumstances considered for the first time?

    Finally, when a legislative emergency bill isn’t accepted, it’s not dead. It can be brought up again. The procedure is fair. The decision can be appealed. And in this case, the House Speaker, Mark Eves, was clear that if Rep. Volk could better explain what her bill is about and show him that there was, in fact, a problem that needed to be addressed by a new law that he would support it.

    That’s not surprising or confusing. It’s fair.

  6. Is this truly a civil rights issue?

    As a point of clarification: The Polaris Project (a laudable organization) referred to in this article has a four tiered rating system of state legislation concerning sex trafficking in America. The most recent ranking report is for July 2013.

    In those ranking, Maine was placed in Tier 2 (the second best category, behind Tier 1 but ahead of Tiers 3 and 4, which is the worst) according to certain laws the project would like to see enacted to protect against this most heinous of crimes.

    That ranking system, however, has nothing to do with the incidence of sex trafficking within any state or the failure of law enforcement or the legislature in any of them to safeguard individuals within their jurisdiction.

    More importantly, the latest annual report (2012) identifies 44 of 20,652 calls received nationally as having come from Maine, 44 of which came from Maine and 2 of those related to sex trafficking. The report does not indicate whether they were reports of alleged trafficking or inquiries about sex trafficking nor any indication of verification.

    My point is not to argue that there is no sex trafficking in Maine, but to suggest that without any data to confirm that there is, or that a single victims has been wrongly incarcerated, this bill is (at best) premature and undeserving of the valuable time our legislators would spend on it.

    If there is a problem in Maine and Rep. Volk has information concerning it, House Speaker Mark Eves has already indicated his support for a legislative remedy in the coming Emergency Session. But if it is merely an opportunistic chance to caste herself in the role of a Republican civil rights, children’s rights or women’s rights advocate, then there are many more significant issues in Maine that she might bring to the legislature to redress the real and present problems of Mainers.

  7. Hi there just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The text in your article seem to be running off the screen in Internet explorer.
    I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with internet browser compatibility but
    I thought I’d post to let you know. The design look great though!
    Hope you get the issue fixed soon. Many thanks

    Also visit my page :: m88


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here