The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • About
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Maine Wire Podcast: Carroll Conley on Abortion, LGBT, and Religious Liberty in Maine
  • Dems Block Debate on Gov’s Late-Term Abortion Bill, Refuse GOP Questioning of Medical Experts
  • Partisan Vote Ends Brakey’s Bid for Welfare Work Requirements
  • Democrats Block Parental Rights Policies, Including Bill to Let Parents “Opt Out” of Critical Race Theory Programming
  • White House Bracing for Supreme Court to Kill Student Loan Forgiveness Program: WSJ
  • State Legislature Poised to Pass Bill Establishing Home “Energy Scoring System” That Will Be Voluntary — For Now
  • Syrian Asylum Seeker Targets Children in Stabbing Spree at French Playground
  • Study Shows Nearly a Third of Gen Z Supports In-Home Government Surveillance Cameras
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Login
Friday, June 9
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • About
  • Contact
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Supreme Court Upholds Federal Obamacare Subsidies
National

Supreme Court Upholds Federal Obamacare Subsidies

Patrick MarvinBy Patrick MarvinJune 25, 2015Updated:July 7, 2015No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

On Thursday, the United States Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of the Obama administration in King v. Burwell, a lawsuit which challenged the IRS’ rewriting of key provisions of the Affordable Care Act.

The case would have caused roughly 61,000 Mainers to lose federal subsidies, but would have freed over 72,000 Maine citizens from the individual mandate, and over 387,000 workers from the employer mandate.

At issue in the case was whether or not insurance plans sold through the federal insurance market, known as healthcare.gov, were eligible for government subsidies.

The subsidies – which are available for individuals who earn up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level – cover roughly 72 percent of the cost of an individual’s insurance plan.

The plaintiffs alleged that the ACA only intended for these subsidies to be used on plans which were purchased through state-based exchanges. They pointed to provisions of the ACA which explicitly stated that individuals were only eligible to receive an insurance subsidy if they purchased a plan through a market “established by the state.”

This would have created an incentive for states to establish their own insurance marketplaces, in order to allow their citizens to receive insurance subsidies.

However, the Supreme Court, in its second ruling which preserves the ACA, ruled in favor of the IRS and the Obama administration, who had allowed subsidies to flow through the federal marketplace because just 24 states established their own exchange.

Chief Justice John Roberts, in the majority opinion, asserted that a “fair construction” of the statute involved looking at more than individual provisions and sections of the text. He opined that although a plain text reading of the ACA did not allow for federal subsidies, a ruling against the Obama administration would cause a “death spiral” of increasing cost and decreasing coverage.

Roberts admitted that the ACA contains many examples of “inartful drafting,” but ruled that the Congress never meant to withhold subsidies from individuals who utilize the federal exchange.

Justices Scalia, in his dissent, strongly criticized the majority for supporting and rewriting the law, and went so far as claiming that Obamacare should now be referred to as “SCOTUScare.”

ACA Featured king v burwell Maine Obamacare Supreme Court
Previous ArticleSpeaker Eves Loses Charter School Job After Pressure From Governor LePage
Next Article Spare me your tears, Mr. Eves
Patrick Marvin

Patrick Marvin is a former Policy Analyst for The Maine Heritage Policy Center. He holds a Masters Degree from the University of New Hampshire, and has an extensive background in analysis and research.

Related Posts

Maine Wire Podcast: Carroll Conley on Abortion, LGBT, and Religious Liberty in Maine

June 8, 2023

Dems Block Debate on Gov’s Late-Term Abortion Bill, Refuse GOP Questioning of Medical Experts

June 8, 2023

Partisan Vote Ends Brakey’s Bid for Welfare Work Requirements

June 8, 2023

Leave A Reply

Recent News

Maine Wire Podcast: Carroll Conley on Abortion, LGBT, and Religious Liberty in Maine

June 8, 2023

Dems Block Debate on Gov’s Late-Term Abortion Bill, Refuse GOP Questioning of Medical Experts

June 8, 2023

Partisan Vote Ends Brakey’s Bid for Welfare Work Requirements

June 8, 2023

Democrats Block Parental Rights Policies, Including Bill to Let Parents “Opt Out” of Critical Race Theory Programming

June 8, 2023

White House Bracing for Supreme Court to Kill Student Loan Forgiveness Program: WSJ

June 8, 2023
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login below or Register Now.

Lost password?

Register Now!

Already registered? Login.

A password will be e-mailed to you.