The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • About
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Maine Wire Podcast: Carroll Conley on Abortion, LGBT, and Religious Liberty in Maine
  • Dems Block Debate on Gov’s Late-Term Abortion Bill, Refuse GOP Questioning of Medical Experts
  • Partisan Vote Ends Brakey’s Bid for Welfare Work Requirements
  • Democrats Block Parental Rights Policies, Including Bill to Let Parents “Opt Out” of Critical Race Theory Programming
  • White House Bracing for Supreme Court to Kill Student Loan Forgiveness Program: WSJ
  • State Legislature Poised to Pass Bill Establishing Home “Energy Scoring System” That Will Be Voluntary — For Now
  • Syrian Asylum Seeker Targets Children in Stabbing Spree at French Playground
  • Study Shows Nearly a Third of Gen Z Supports In-Home Government Surveillance Cameras
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Login
Friday, June 9
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • About
  • Contact
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Thousands of Mainers Could See Premium Increases over 40%
Commentary

Thousands of Mainers Could See Premium Increases over 40%

Nathan StroutBy Nathan StroutMay 19, 2016Updated:May 19, 2016No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Community Health Options (CHO), a Lewiston-based insurance provider, has asked the Maine Bureau of Insurance for a whopping 44.9% rate increase on their catastrophic level plan.

CHO is one of 23 nonprofit Consumer Operated and Oriented Plans (co-ops) created under the Affordable Care Act, over half of which have since failed. Being the only co-op to turn a profit in 2014, CHO was initially held up as a success story amidst the otherwise dismal performances of the co-ops. In 2015, however, CHO began to rack up significant losses and ended the year with losses of over $30 million and projected losses of $40 million for 2016.

In response, CHO announced that it would no longer be accepting new enrollments in the middle of the 2016 open enrollment period. The Maine Bureau of Insurance tried to help stop the massive losses by putting CHO into receivership and cutting thousands of plans, but the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) rejected that plan. CHO has continued to work closely with the Bureau of Insurance along with CMS in order to get back on sturdier financial ground heading into 2016. Although CHO has yet to file a financial report for the first quarter of 2016, the Bureau of Insurance has noted that the nonprofit is largely keeping to a plan hashed out months ago.

The catastrophic plan which will see the 44.9% rate increase is available on the Obamacare exchanges for those under 30 or for those over 30 who have been granted a hardship extension–essentially, those who are not able to afford large premiums but who don’t qualify for Medicaid. Catastrophic plans have lower premiums and higher deductibles than most plans, and are generally seen as the most affordable insurance option. In the 2016 open enrollment period, 1% of the 84,059 Mainers who enrolled through the exchanges chose catastrophic plans. Anthem, CHO’s only competitor on the exchanges, has requested a rate increase on its equivalent catastrophic plan between 10% and 14%. CHO is actually raising all of its rates by double digits, with the lowest increase being about 17%, but most being over 20%.

[RELATED: Maine’s Obamacare Success Story Falters]

Curiously, the nonprofit insurer raised rates by only minimal amounts in past years and actually reduced rates on its catastrophic plan by 3% and 6% in 2014 and 2015 respectively. This, in part, speaks to the problems new insurers can have adjusting to the insurance market, especially when they are heavily pressured to offer plans at the lowest possible prices without data on what future payouts will look like. CHO was further jeopardized by the low levels of capital it kept to insure it in the case of massive losses like those seen in 2015.

Of course, the co-ops were never expected to stand on their own–at least for the first few years. Instead, the Affordable Care Act set up what are known as risk corridors. Essentially, risk corridors were meant to transfer excess profits from successful insurers on the exchanges to counter losses from unsuccessful insurers. These risk corridors could only be effective if there were net profits across the exchanges, but, perhaps unsurprisingly, 2015 showed net loss. Under the law, the federal government was supposed to bail out the insurers with a massive influx of cash into the risk corridors, but a Congressional budget deal blocked any such bailout. Co-ops like CHO had used the promised bailout of the risk corridors as an excuse to keep capital low, as any major losses could be averted with a transfer from the profits of more successful insurers.

A mixture of unsustainably priced plans, higher than expected enrollment, and less healthy enrollees helped lead to CHO’s 2015/2016 losses. Raising prices as proposed is one obvious way to stem the losses and get the organization back on the right track. In the process though, one is left asking what the point of the nonprofit co-ops was. If the point was to keep lower premiums and avoid drastic rate increases like those noted, then CHO is failing on all counts. Ultimately, if CHO can get back on solid financial ground, it’s unclear whether it will look any different than the for-profit insurers it was set up to replace.

CHO community health options Featured health care exchange health insurance Obamacare Opinion rates
Previous ArticleMaine DHHS Puts Limit on Automatic Replacement of EBT Cards
Next Article Federal Circuit Court Rules Against Obama Administration
Nathan Strout
  • Website

Nathan Strout is a Development Associate with The Maine Heritage Policy Center as well as a staff writer for The Maine Wire. Born and raised in Portland, Strout is a graduate of Eastern University with a B.A. in Political Science and a minor in Legal Studies.

Related Posts

Maine Wire Podcast: Carroll Conley on Abortion, LGBT, and Religious Liberty in Maine

June 8, 2023

Dems Block Debate on Gov’s Late-Term Abortion Bill, Refuse GOP Questioning of Medical Experts

June 8, 2023

Partisan Vote Ends Brakey’s Bid for Welfare Work Requirements

June 8, 2023

Leave A Reply

Recent News

Maine Wire Podcast: Carroll Conley on Abortion, LGBT, and Religious Liberty in Maine

June 8, 2023

Dems Block Debate on Gov’s Late-Term Abortion Bill, Refuse GOP Questioning of Medical Experts

June 8, 2023

Partisan Vote Ends Brakey’s Bid for Welfare Work Requirements

June 8, 2023

Democrats Block Parental Rights Policies, Including Bill to Let Parents “Opt Out” of Critical Race Theory Programming

June 8, 2023

White House Bracing for Supreme Court to Kill Student Loan Forgiveness Program: WSJ

June 8, 2023
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login below or Register Now.

Lost password?

Register Now!

Already registered? Login.

A password will be e-mailed to you.