The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Communities Wait for Answers on Union Murder as Anyone with Information is Urged to Come Forward
  • Somerset County Sheriff’s Office Seizes Fentanyl and Cocaine in Fairfield Drug Bust, Three Arrested
  • SCOTUS Temporarily Greenlights Trump Admin’s “Critical Transformation” of Federal Bureaucracy
  • Suspect Arrested in Stabbing Outside Teen Homeless Shelter in Portland
  • LePage Exceeds $500,000 in Donations After Just Two Months in the CD-2 Race, Campaign Says
  • New USDA Initiative Cracks Down on Chinese Ownership of U.S. Farmland
  • Yarmouth Clam Fest Vegan Options? Redditors For The Maine Tradition Are Steamed
  • Operation Take Back America: Chinese Nationals Plead Guilty in $92M Drug Money Laundering Scheme
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Wednesday, July 9
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Commentary » Ballot Questions Are Terrible Ways to Make Law
Commentary

Ballot Questions Are Terrible Ways to Make Law

Michael CianchetteBy Michael CianchetteOctober 4, 2016No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

If I told you an interest group sent a legislator a draft bill and told them to submit it as-is, no questions asked, most would call foul and cry “corruption!” And if that same interest group filled the State House with paid advocates demanding legislators only consider a yes-or-no vote, people would suspect something afoot. And they would probably be right.

When we elect lawmakers, we expect them to weigh various proposals. Recognizing that a first draft isn’t always the best, we empower the Legislature to amend bills, sanding off rough edges and trying to fashion the best solution to the problem at hand. They don’t — or at least, shouldn’t — capitulate to an advocacy group simply because that group has a lot of money or yells the loudest.

Yet when questions go on the ballot — and the people take on the role of lawmakers — the entire construct is flipped on its head. Mainers are forced make an up-or-down choice. No amendments allowed. And often the only way to get the signatures necessary to put a question on the ballot is to spend gobs of money on professional petitioners “from away.” Then the interest group uses its hefty checkbook to flood the airwaves with TV and radio spots.

Still worse, the arguments appearing in the slick ads don’t always match reality. Remember last year’s Clean Election question? The one that promised all sorts of great things, including improved disclosure laws like requiring the top three donors be listed on commercials? Let me ask: how many advertisements supporting the gun control question have you seen that list their donors?

The answer? None. The group that wrote the Clean Elections law conveniently left themselves and their compatriots — the interest groups peddling ballot initiatives — outside the law’s disclosure requirements. Yes, the very same disclosure requirements they trumpeted as a major selling point.

That is part of the perversity of the referendum process. We constantly hear how dangerous big donors are when it comes to influencing Maine legislators, tying ourselves up in knots to combat them. Yet most legislators can easily run a race for a few thousand dollars as long as they knock on doors and adequately reflect their district. No matter how much money is spent by a GOP candidate, you’re not going to see a Republican House member from Munjoy Hill in Portland.

But when we are dealing with ballot questions, big donors do have a substantial impact. Look at the spending reports for organizations supporting the five referenda on this November’s ballot. In each case, the vast majority of the money spent advocating passage comes from New York- and Washington, D.C.-based organizations. They hired lawyers to write the exact language they want, they paid for signature gatherers to place it on the ballot, and they pay canvassers to share their talking points and get it passed.

Instead of entrusting these matters to the 186 legislators Mainers choose every two years — and can throw out after two years if they aren’t doing a good job — we get self-contained campaigns that potentially let interest groups write exactly what they want into law. Oddly enough, this is often what groups on the right are accused of doing when they offer model legislation. Yet those bills go through a legislative process, and are often significantly amended on the way to enactment, if they even get that far.

So, as we approach November, consider whether referenda really are best way to make law. No amendments, up-or-down votes, with language written by those advocating for a specific outcome — no compromise. Sounds like everything wrong with politics, no?

*This article was originally published in the BDN.

ballot initiative citizen's initiative Featured Opinion referendum
Previous ArticleQuestion 3 Intentionally Confusing to Isolate Gun Owners
Next Article LePage Named Most Fiscally Responsible Governor in America
Michael Cianchette

Michael Cianchette was the chief counsel to Gov. Paul LePage from 2012-2013 and deputy counsel from 2011-2012. A Navy reservist, he was deployed to Afghanistan from 2013-2014 as a trainer and adviser to the Afghan National Police. He is an alumnus of the Leadership Maine program and holds a BA in economics and political science from Boston College along with a JD and an MBA from Suffolk University. He works as in-house counsel and financial manager for a number of affiliated companies in southern Maine.

Subscribe to Substack

Related Posts

New Maine Energy Law Promises Ratepayer Relief, but Instead Delivers Political Cover for Democrats in the 2026 Midterms

July 9, 2025
(Screen Capture: PBS News Hour)

TRENT ENGLAND And JASON SNEAD: Time To Say Goodbye To Ranked Choice Voting

July 8, 2025

Bowdoin Graduate Zohran Mamdani and the Echoes of David Duke: Josh Filler

July 5, 2025

Leave A Reply

Subscribe to Substack
Recent News

Communities Wait for Answers on Union Murder as Anyone with Information is Urged to Come Forward

July 9, 2025

Somerset County Sheriff’s Office Seizes Fentanyl and Cocaine in Fairfield Drug Bust, Three Arrested

July 9, 2025

SCOTUS Temporarily Greenlights Trump Admin’s “Critical Transformation” of Federal Bureaucracy

July 9, 2025

Suspect Arrested in Stabbing Outside Teen Homeless Shelter in Portland

July 9, 2025

LePage Exceeds $500,000 in Donations After Just Two Months in the CD-2 Race, Campaign Says

July 9, 2025
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.