The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • About
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • State House Kills “Right to Work” Legislation Prohibiting Employment Conditional on Payment of Union Dues
  • Trump Indicted on Federal Charges in Classified Documents Probe as Biden Faces Bribery Allegations
  • Gov’s Late-Term Abortion Bill Heads to House Amid Acrimony [Podcast]
  • Maine Wire Podcast: Carroll Conley on Abortion, LGBT, and Religious Liberty in Maine
  • Dems Block Debate on Gov’s Late-Term Abortion Bill, Refuse GOP Questioning of Medical Experts
  • Partisan Vote Ends Brakey’s Bid for Welfare Work Requirements
  • Democrats Block Parental Rights Policies, Including Bill to Let Parents “Opt Out” of Critical Race Theory Programming
  • White House Bracing for Supreme Court to Kill Student Loan Forgiveness Program: WSJ
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Login
Friday, June 9
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • About
  • Contact
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Lessons in disruption from the 19th Century
News

Lessons in disruption from the 19th Century

Nick MurrayBy Nick MurrayFebruary 4, 2019No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Today’s world is in many ways at a crossroads, especially as technology and innovation continually reshape the economy, specifically models of service delivery. Think Uber, Khan Academy and even Bitcoin. New and exciting ways to innovate and disrupt capture our collective attention as we wonder what the future might bring.

It causes one to wonder: How long can some industries insulate themselves from the coming storm and resist competition? And how long can public services survive in a world where private, digital solutions move faster than government by orders of magnitude?

There were other Americans in history who faced this challenge, but the major players are still the same. Would the visionaries of the 19th century (considered by some at the time to be crackpots) have been able to fight the inertia of today’s massive bureaucracy?

The story of Lysander Spooner comes to mind. In the mid-1800s, he endeavored to provide a more efficient method of delivering mail than the early Post Office. He was repeatedly targeted and punished by the U.S. Federal Government for his efforts.

Spooner was born on a farm outside Athol, Massachusetts in the frigid January of 1808. His family were outspoken abolitionists, and as a young man, Lysander Spooner immersed himself in the law, clerking under future Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Charles Allen. He became an activist for many causes related to individual liberty, which led him to confront the United States Postal Service and its shoddy work.

Spooner succeeded in his early efforts to provide a better mail service at a lower cost. In 1844, postal rates had become so expensive, Spooner determined competition was sorely needed. It cost 18 ¾ cents to send a letter from Boston to New York and 25 cents to get it to Washington D.C. A letter sent from Boston to Albany, written on a quarter-ounce sheet of paper cost almost as much as the Western Railroad’s freight charge to carry a barrel of flour along the same route.

To answer this, Spooner offered to carry letters daily in between each of the early American hubs: Baltimore, Philadelphia, New York and Boston (twice daily between Philadelphia and New York) for only 6 ¼ cents per half-ounce letter. He audaciously dubbed his outfit the “American Letter Mail Company.”

He was fiercely targeted by Congress and the Postal Service for usurping their de facto monopoly on letter delivery. Multiple suits were filed against Spooner and his rebel cohorts for infractions like using Postal-owned railways for his letter-carrying, but the courts absolved him and even expressed doubt that the Federal Government could monopolize mail delivery under the Constitution.

By mid-1845, Congress saw no other option that to lower rates. It was decreed that any letter weighted under a half-ounce and delivered within 300 miles would only cost 5 cents. Spooner was making a measurable impact on the cost of mail delivery for early Americans, demonstrating a real-world need for competition.

He lowered his rates in turn, but by 1851, Congress had enacted multiple protections on the government monopoly of mail, included the power of the Post Office to declare any local road a post road. This move crippled the American Letter Mail Company, along with a handful of other private mail carriers still in operation, and Spooner had to disband it.

He died in 1877, and not much has been told about him since, but his story bears remembrance. Like so many innovators and entrepreneurs today, Spooner faced the prospect of a government so cumbersome, yet so protective of its own power, that an existential threat from a more nimble, more efficient private actor meant he had to be quashed.

Tech entrepreneurs – the disruptors – are needed now more than ever to challenge the status quo across the economy. Americans are demanding more responsive, individually-tailored services. Who among us believes that our government agencies today would thrive under new competition with an army of 21st-century Lysander Spooners?

Commentary economy Featured innovation private sector protectionism technology
Previous ArticleBallot initiatives should reflect the ambitions of Mainers in both congressional districts
Next Article Governor Mills’ budget should include meaningful tax reforms
Nick Murray
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Nick Murray, a resident of Poland, currently serves as Director of Policy with Maine Policy Institute, developing MPI's policy research, analysis, and strategic advocacy priorities. He is the author of numerous articles and publications such as the 50-State Emergency Powers Scorecard, Long-Term Growth vs. Short-Term Gimmicks: Maine's Economy and Gov. Mills' Second Biennial Budget, Sticker Shock: Maine's Burdensome Vehicle Inspection Mandate, and COVID Catastrophe: the Consequences of Societal Shutdowns.

Related Posts

State House Kills “Right to Work” Legislation Prohibiting Employment Conditional on Payment of Union Dues

June 9, 2023

Trump Indicted on Federal Charges in Classified Documents Probe as Biden Faces Bribery Allegations

June 9, 2023

Gov’s Late-Term Abortion Bill Heads to House Amid Acrimony [Podcast]

June 9, 2023

Leave A Reply

Recent News

State House Kills “Right to Work” Legislation Prohibiting Employment Conditional on Payment of Union Dues

June 9, 2023

Trump Indicted on Federal Charges in Classified Documents Probe as Biden Faces Bribery Allegations

June 9, 2023

Gov’s Late-Term Abortion Bill Heads to House Amid Acrimony [Podcast]

June 9, 2023

Maine Wire Podcast: Carroll Conley on Abortion, LGBT, and Religious Liberty in Maine

June 8, 2023

Dems Block Debate on Gov’s Late-Term Abortion Bill, Refuse GOP Questioning of Medical Experts

June 8, 2023
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login below or Register Now.

Lost password?

Register Now!

Already registered? Login.

A password will be e-mailed to you.