The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Cumberland County DA Weighs In to Defend Corrections Officer Who Allegedly Overstayed His Visa
  • Susan Collins Defends Her Position on Congressional Oversight of Nation’s Capital after Ted Cruz Charge
  • Maine Think Tank Urges Janet Mills to Stick to Her 2017 Position and Veto Expansion of Ranked Choice Voting
  • Border Patrol Busts 3,000 Foot Cartel Tunnel Connecting Mexico and San Diego
  • New Details on Portland Woman Identified as a Member of Antifa “Militia,” Threatened Agents
  • Westbrook Police Nab Gray Man Suspected Accused of Stealing Tools from Local Business
  • Bipartisan Bill Barring Maine Legislative Staff from Lobbying for One Year Signed into Law
  • Trump Admin Closes Biden-Era Loophole That Let China Scoop Up Americans’ DNA
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Monday, June 23
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Education » New bill creates unnecessary burden for special needs students and their families
Education

New bill creates unnecessary burden for special needs students and their families

Nick MurrayBy Nick MurrayFebruary 13, 2019Updated:February 18, 2019No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

On Thursday, Feb. 14 the legislature’s education committee held a public hearing on a bill, LD 464, that would greatly affect the landscape of options for special needs students in Maine.

If you are a parent of a special needs child and you are not satisfied with how your home school district is providing your child’s education, you have recourse referred to as a “unilateral special education placement.” Under the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), parents may move a child from their local public school district to a non-public school in order to ensure a “free appropriate public education” for the child.

Parents may request a hearing with the home district to attempt to recover the costs of a unilateral placement. Federal law allows for this to occur as long as parents file a complaint within two years asserting that a free appropriate public education had not been available to their child.

LD 464, sponsored by Rep. Teresa Pierce of Falmouth, would restrict parents’ ability to request a reimbursement hearing to within 90 days of the child’s first day enrolled in an alternative program.

Parents who have reached out to The Maine Wire have expressed worry that this bill, if passed, would further burden them since pursuing a unilateral special education placement only occurs in extreme cases. When families undertake this option, many times they need legal representation in order to make the best case for their child, incurring even greater costs.

The vast majority are not trained to navigate this process. Parents must prove that their school district had not made available a free appropriate education for their special needs child and that the specialized school will do so. This is an exorbitantly high standard imposed on Maine families and limits choice in their child’s education.

Passage of this bill would not only impose a significant additional burden for families with special education needs, but also for the specialized schools that provide this vital service.

Disability Rights Maine (DRM), an organization that represents folks who are experiencing discrimination or a violation of their rights based on a disability, is testifying against LD 464 at its public hearing. Atlee Riley, a managing attorney with DRM explained their position in response to an inquiry by The Maine Wire:

“[T]he proposed reduction in the filing period contemplated by LD 464 is significantly more restrictive than the default standard in federal law and is out of step with almost every other limitations period in Maine. In addition, it would place potentially insurmountable burdens on families of children with disabilities who have determined that they must, at great financial risk, secure privately what they could not obtain publicly.”

Mr. Atlee cites various other limitations in state and federal law much broader than this proposal. For instance, the limit on filing for attorney malpractice is 6 years and 3 years for medical malpractice. For claims against ski areas? A whole 2 years.

Because the shorter time period for parents’ appeals would cause them to shy away from even considering a non-public option, the alternative schools that provide special needs programs would suffer as well. The effects would be far-reaching, and legislators should be thinking of the unintended consequences.

Betsy Mahoney of the Autism Society of Maine also testified against this bill, along with a host of concerned parents. ASM’s written testimony can be found here, which includes a straight-forward fact sheet, eloquently stating the numerous issues with LD 464.

Why would our public officials consider stacking the deck against special needs students? The struggle their families endure to find the right school or program is more than most of us can imagine.

Lawmakers have a responsibility to ensure access to quality education for all children in Maine. LD 464 would squeeze families’ options and leave special needs students behind.

Commentary education Education Funding educational choice Featured
Previous ArticleFree college, Medicare for All and other insanities of the extreme left
Next Article Tax dollars should never be used to elect members of Congress
Nick Murray
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Nick Murray, a resident of Poland, currently serves as Director of Policy with Maine Policy Institute, developing MPI's policy research, analysis, and strategic advocacy priorities. He is the author of numerous articles and publications such as the 50-State Emergency Powers Scorecard, Long-Term Growth vs. Short-Term Gimmicks: Maine's Economy and Gov. Mills' Second Biennial Budget, Sticker Shock: Maine's Burdensome Vehicle Inspection Mandate, and COVID Catastrophe: the Consequences of Societal Shutdowns.

Subscribe to Substack

Related Posts

Top Trump Official Calls On Parents To Join Fight Against Left’s Education Takeover

June 19, 2025

House Passes Bill to Bar Males from Girls’ Sports One Day After Senate Nixes Similar Bill

June 16, 2025

Dems Defeat Effort to Include Total Cost of Proposed School Budgets on Mainers’ Ballots

June 16, 2025

Leave A Reply

Subscribe to Substack
Recent News

Cumberland County DA Weighs In to Defend Corrections Officer Who Allegedly Overstayed His Visa

June 20, 2025

Susan Collins Defends Her Position on Congressional Oversight of Nation’s Capital after Ted Cruz Charge

June 20, 2025

Maine Think Tank Urges Janet Mills to Stick to Her 2017 Position and Veto Expansion of Ranked Choice Voting

June 20, 2025

Border Patrol Busts 3,000 Foot Cartel Tunnel Connecting Mexico and San Diego

June 20, 2025

New Details on Portland Woman Identified as a Member of Antifa “Militia,” Threatened Agents

June 20, 2025
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.