There is a very profound reason that the American constitutional republic has created the highest standard of living, for more people than any other country at any time on Earth.ย Americans have the individual rights to life, liberty, and property.ย ย We have a written constitution that gives constancy to our laws and a capitalist, free-market economic system that provides upward mobility for all.ย
Despite manโs ability to muck things up, the American system is far and away the best system for producing individual freedom, economic mobility and the highest standard of living for all ever devised by man. Why would anyone want to change this proven success with proven failures?
Radio broadcaster Paul Harvey explained it as well as anyone: โIt was self-serving politicians who convinced recent generations of Americans that we could all stand in a circle with our hands in each otherโs pockets and somehow get rich.”
Maineโs political class needs to take a close look at poverty-stricken countries. Impoverished countries have the least respect for individual rights, life, liberty, and property. The more government centrally controls the morals, economics and laws of a country, the greater the disparity in wealth between political class (politicians, crony capitalists, petty tyrants, and dictators) and the people (factory workers, construction workers, middle management, small business owners, educators, farmers, truckers, etc).
Governor Janet Mills and her allies in the legislature subscribe to the British common law/precedent view of law based on a โlivingโ constitution. The problem with this view is that it is unconstitutional to the extent that common practice and/or precedent cannot modify our constitution, which can only be accomplished if two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of the states affirm that the people want their constitution amended. Unfortunately, the political class and the elites think that, if they wish it so, it should be so, and therefore will be so.
For instance, Governor Mills and her comrades appear hell-bent on taking our great state and its people down the rabbit hole of unconstitutional socialism. They are dividing Mainers into competing groups that are each told they have an unlimited, primary claim on the assets of the other groups; that a simple majority vote gives government control over all aspects of society. Often there is no rhyme or reason for their policies other than retaining power.
Just look at some of the policies proposed in recent legislative sessions:
ยทEliminating the Electoral College โ Why? Because they lost the last presidential election (if their candidate wins the next election with the Electoral College but loses the popular vote, Iโm sure weโll see a reversal on this front).
ยทThe โGreen New Deal for Maineโ โ Pure fantasy said with a straight face.
ยทRank Choice Voting โ Purely unconstitutional for state-level elections according to the Maine Constitution, but passed into state law via ballot initiative.
ยทMedicaid Expansion โ Expanding Medicaid way beyond the original lawโs intent, once again causing resources to flow from those workers who build the private sector to those able-bodied adults who choose not to work.
ยทUniversal Healthcare โ Providing government-run health care to everyone regardless of cost. Again, those who work will bear the burden so others who donโt can have healthcare.
ยทFree College โ Sounds great, except that children who donโt go to college will go to work to pay for those who do. To add insult to injury, the college grads will, on average, earn more than the workers who paid for their โfreeโ college education.
The governor and her allies fail to see that capitalism works because of the free marketโs incentives: self-interest based on industry, self- improvement and individual responsibility. Socialism doesnโt work because of socialismโs disincentives: self-interest based on sloth, group identity and government dependence.



