The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • Podcasts
  • About
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Piantidosi CD1 Candidate – Antisemites Come Out of the Shadows
  • John Fetterman Once Again Breaks With His Party and Suggests That Democrats Should Engage With Republicans on the Border
  • Woke Ideology and Foreign Money are Corrupting Education
  • Maine’s Attorney General Signs Onto Amicus Brief Supporting California’s Large-Capacity Magazine Ban
  • Maine’s Congressional Delegation Splits Over Bill Blocking Federal EPA from Adopting EV Mandates
  • Some FACTS About The New Electric Auto Rule
  • Pro-Palestine Protestors Block Road Outside Bath Iron Works, Demand Shipyard Stop Arming “Imperialist Genocide”
  • Suspect Accused of Home Invasion While Out on Bail Leads South Portland Police on Second Police Chase
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Login
Sunday, December 10
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • Podcasts
  • About
  • Contact
The Maine Wire
Home » News » In light of ProPublica report, Congress looks primed to ravage IRAs
Commentary

In light of ProPublica report, Congress looks primed to ravage IRAs

Nick LinderBy Nick LinderJuly 27, 2021Updated:July 27, 2021No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

After ProPublica released their not-so-bombshell report on wealthy individuals and their taxes in June, Congress took notice.

Different members of the House Ways and Means Committee (HWMC) have recently mentioned intent to craft legislation putting new restrictions on Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and 401(k)s. 

These kinds of investment accounts were created to enable average, middle-class Americans to save for retirement more easily and effectively. The IRAs in particular are accounts that have a low barrier to entry and allow any American to grow their wealth for the purpose of retirement.

Traditional and Roth IRAs have slightly different rules, but the principles remain the same: you invest your money within the account, it grows, and the taxes you pay on that growth are significantly limited. In exchange for the tax advantages, you cannot easily access that money you invested until you hit retirement age, defined as 59-and-a-half.

In a Roth IRA specifically, you put post-tax money in, and once you reach retirement age, you can withdraw all of that money without any additional taxes taken out. 

That leads us to the controversy surrounding Peter Thiel, co-founder of Paypal, and his use of a Roth IRA.

In the ProPublica report, it was found that Thiel grew his Roth IRA from essentially nothing to $5 billion. And you already know how ProPublica colored that narrative: tax avoidance.

Thiel bought shares of Paypal when it was just starting out for $.001 a piece. He invested $1,700 in the company to own 1.7 million shares.

Once the share price rose significantly after PayPal took off, Thiel sold some of those stocks to invest in other tech startups, like Facebook, before they were popular.

He continued these well-performing investments up through today, when his Roth IRA is worth $5 billion.

ProPublica painted this as a “sidestep” of the tax code when, in reality, he just hit the lottery with his investments.

There have been concerns raised that the PayPal shares were simply undervalued before Thiel bought them, as he was a co-founder, but there has been no evidence to prove these allegations.

If there are legitimate concerns about such malfeasance, it should be investigated. But based on the facts now, though, Thiel did nothing wrong. He just used the system to his advantage and hit the jackpot with his investments. We should wish that for every American looking to save for retirement.

The new rumored restrictions on retirement accounts should alarm every person who has one or is looking to create one. 

Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass), Chairman of the HWMC, said he is considering legislation that would limit “the total amount of money that can be saved in tax-preferred retirement accounts, and put an end to the tax dodging some do when saving in IRAs.”

Tax-dodging? Seriously? The whole point of these accounts is that they are tax-advantaged in the first place, not taxed as normal. People would not be so incentivised to actually use the accounts and save for retirement if they were not tax-advantaged.

Thiel followed all the rules, so he deserves the money in his account. Contrary to critics, he did not use it as a “tax shelter.”

Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Maryland) said he is “considering reforms, such as banning the use of IRAs to purchase nonpublic investments.”

Others have said that once an IRA reaches a certain threshold, everything above that threshold should be taxed.

Restrictions such as these and others will only serve to harm everyday Americans who make smart investing decisions to set themselves up for a successful retirement.

Per Investopedia, “There [are] just 791 IRAs with between $10 million and $25 million, accounting for only 0.0018% of accounts. The vast majority of IRAs—about 98%—have balances of $1 million or less.”

Clearly, the vast majority of people taking advantage of IRAs are everyday Americans who have a modest amount saved for their retirement. Congress was the one to create this avenue for saving, and now they are trying to backpedal.

Enacting restrictions on these useful accounts people rely on for retirement will do nothing to stop supposed “tax evasion” and will instead hurt people like you and me, making it harder for us to set ourselves up for retirement.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Commentary Congress Featured House Ways and Means Committee Individual Retirement Account Investing investment Investopedia IRAs Opinion PayPal Peter Thiel ProPublica regulation regulations Retirement retirement savings Roth IRA saving for retirement stock market tax code tax increases Taxes traditional IRA
Previous ArticleMills’ ‘Back to Work’ program not helping Maine’s stagnant unemployment rate
Next Article What will school look like when Maine students return to the classroom this fall?
Nick Linder

Nicholas Linder, of Cincinnati, is a communications Intern for Maine Policy Institute. He is going into his second year of studying finance and public policy analysis at The Ohio State University. On campus, he is involved with Students Consulting for Nonprofit Organizations and Business for Good.

Related Posts

Piantidosi CD1 Candidate – Antisemites Come Out of the Shadows

December 9, 2023

John Fetterman Once Again Breaks With His Party and Suggests That Democrats Should Engage With Republicans on the Border

December 9, 2023

Woke Ideology and Foreign Money are Corrupting Education

December 9, 2023

Leave A Reply

Recent News

John Fetterman Once Again Breaks With His Party and Suggests That Democrats Should Engage With Republicans on the Border

December 9, 2023

Maine’s Attorney General Signs Onto Amicus Brief Supporting California’s Large-Capacity Magazine Ban

December 9, 2023

Maine’s Congressional Delegation Splits Over Bill Blocking Federal EPA from Adopting EV Mandates

December 9, 2023

Pro-Palestine Protestors Block Road Outside Bath Iron Works, Demand Shipyard Stop Arming “Imperialist Genocide”

December 8, 2023

Suspect Accused of Home Invasion While Out on Bail Leads South Portland Police on Second Police Chase

December 8, 2023
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login below or Register Now.

Lost password?

Register Now!

Already registered? Login.

A password will be e-mailed to you.