The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • Podcasts
  • About
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Portland Man Fatally Stabs Himself after Police Respond to Burglary Attempt
  • Nearly Half Of Homeschool Parents Cite ‘Liberal’ Public Schools As Motivating Factor: POLL
  • Offshore Wind Making Everything More Expensive, From Lobsters To Electricity: FRANK LASSEE
  • House Republicans Launch Probe into Biden Energy Secretary’s Disasterous Taxpayer-Funded EV Road Trip
  • IRS Grants Tax Extension to Feb. 15 for Mainers Affected by Hurricane Lee
  • Portland City Council to Consider $134,000 150-Bed Expansion to Homeless Shelter by Emergency Declaration
  • Dangerous Company: Sam Patten’s Memoir Is a Riveting Insight Into 25 Years of American Foreign Policy
  • New Maine CDC Director Recommends Masks and Latest COVID Booster for Everybody Ages 6 months and Older
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Login
Wednesday, September 27
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • Podcasts
  • About
  • Contact
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Mills vetoes state takeover of utility companies, setting stage for future ballot initiative
News

Mills vetoes state takeover of utility companies, setting stage for future ballot initiative

Katherine RevelloBy Katherine RevelloJuly 14, 2021Updated:July 14, 2021No Comments6 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Gov. Janet Mills held a press conference on Tuesday to announce her veto of LD 1708, which would have created a consumer-owned utility known as the Pine Tree Power Company.

Mills’ veto was expected, as she had been publicly critical of the bill before. LD 1708 would have forced the state’s investor-owned utilities, Central Maine Power and Versant Power, to sell their assets to Pine Tree Power. To finance these purchases, Pine Tree Power would have issued debt against its future revenues. It also would have been governed by a publicly-elected board, which would have used a competitive bidding process to award contracts to run its acquired utilities.

In a June 2 interview with Maine Public, Mills called the bill rushed and said it provided a “rosy solution to a very complicated series of problems.” 

Mills reiterated many of these concerns in her veto letter. Mills stated she believes the services Maine utilities provide are flawed and can be improved, but she does not believe LD 1708, which she called “a patchwork of political promises rather than a methodical reformation of Maine’s complicated electrical and distribution system,” is the right solution.

Mills noted the bill was printed on May 17, heard in Committee on May 20, worked in committee on June 1 and then voted on the same day. She also expressed concern that a last minute amendment that would have made Pine Tree Power liable to property taxes didn’t take into account that doing so may have made it unable to issue tax-exempt bonds.

Mill expressed further concerns that what she called the bill’s “rush to enactment” didn’t take into account issues an independent review conducted by London Economic International identified as needing further study. She noted that the Energy and Utilities Committee voted to create a task force to look into those concerns, but the task force never materialized. As a result, Mills said significant issues identified by the independent review, such as a lack of a business plan, have not been addressed.

“Instead, L.D. 1708 simply defers them to be dealt with by the authority’s elected board. The stakes are too high for that. Basic due diligence demands that we have that information before committing the State to this large a venture.” said Mills. 

Another of Mills’ concerns was the bill’s requirement that Pine Tree Power award its utility contract to bidders with “familiarity with the systems to be administered.” Mills pointed out this “would leave Central Maine Power and Versant – the same entities whose assets were just condemned – in the most obvious position to win the contracts to operate their own former assets.”

The bill also requires the Public Utilities Commission to find that all debts incurred by Pine Tree Power prior to acquiring Versant and Central Maine Power “just and reasonable.” As there is no requirement that voting members of Pine Tree Power’s governing board have experience running a utility, Mills expressed concern they would have to contract with attorneys and consultants to help fulfill the company’s mission. Mills said this, coupled with the law’s requirement that all expenses be declared just and reasonable, is “a recipe for excessive spending and an inevitable increase in rates to consumers.”

LD 1708 would have put the question of whether to create a consumer-owned utility to voters. The bill stipulated the language that would have appeared in the ballot question: 

“Do you favor the creation of the Pine Tree Power Company, a nonprofit, privately operated utility, governed by a board elected by Maine voters, to replace Central Maine Power and Versant Power, without using tax dollars or state bonds, and to focus on delivering reliable, affordable electricity, and meeting the State’s energy independence and Internet connectivity goals?”

Mills took issue with this wording, which she said was not an even-handed treatment of the issues surrounding LD 1708.

“It is an attempt to put a finger on the scale of the referendum process by highlighting the most optimistic potential outcomes, with no mention of the potential downside risks,” said Mills.

Mills’ veto letter also noted that the bill was opposed by the mayors of seven Maine cities, three former PUC Commissioners, and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW).

Following Mills’ veto, Michal P. Monahan, the International Vice-President for the IBEW’s second district, applauded the governor’s decision. 

“This bill would have created a government-controlled utility that would have put the retirement benefits of our members at risk, threaten their collective bargaining position by making them state employees and likely lead to less investment in the grid.” Monahan said.

Thomas Welch, a former chair of the PUC, also expressed support for the governor’s decision.

“The Public Utilities Commission, under the able leadership of Chairman Bartlett, has already shown a willingness to use the extensive powers granted it over Maine’s investor-owned utilities by the legislature to address the issues raised by proponents of the government takeover,” Welch said. 

It’s unlikely the bill has enough support to meet the two-thirds majority threshold required for the legislature to overturn the governor’s veto. LD 1708 passed by a vote of 77-68 in the House of Representatives and by a vote of 18-15 in the Senate.

Rep. Seth Berry (D-Bowdoinham), the bill’s sponsor, expressed disappointment with the governor’s veto.

“I’m deeply disappointed in the veto. After winning bipartisan majority support in the committee, House, and Senate, we had hoped the Governor too would trust Maine voters to weigh in this fall. Over three years of diligent work, a diverse group of legislators, utility experts, economists, conservationists, among many others, crafted this policy to meet the complex and urgent needs of our energy future.” said Berry.

Berry and Our Power, a ballot question committee that supports consumer-owned utilities (COUs), intend to ensure the language behind LD 1708 still appears on the ballot. Our Power first registered with the state in 2020, with the intention of creating a ballot question on COUs.

Stephanie Clifford, the campaign manager for Our Power, said in a statement, “With three-quarters of Mainers supporting our proposal and volunteers contacting us daily, we are confident we can collect signatures and succeed at the ballot box.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
consumer-owned utility COU Featured governor janet mills IBEW investor-owned utility IOU Janet Mills Maine PUC news our power pine tree power pine tree power company Public Utilities Commission Rep. Seth Berry veto message vetoes
Previous ArticleMills vetoes another bill sponsored by Senate President Jackson
Next Article Face-saving partisanship killed emergency powers reform in Maine this session
Katherine Revello

Katherine Revello is a reporter for The Maine Wire. She has degrees in journalism and political science from the University of Maine. Her writing has appeared in Reason, The Washington Examiner, and various other publications. Got news tips? Contact Katherine at krevello@mainepolicy.org.

Related Posts

Portland Man Fatally Stabs Himself after Police Respond to Burglary Attempt

September 26, 2023

Nearly Half Of Homeschool Parents Cite ‘Liberal’ Public Schools As Motivating Factor: POLL

September 26, 2023

Offshore Wind Making Everything More Expensive, From Lobsters To Electricity: FRANK LASSEE

September 26, 2023

Leave A Reply

Recent News

Portland Man Fatally Stabs Himself after Police Respond to Burglary Attempt

September 26, 2023

Nearly Half Of Homeschool Parents Cite ‘Liberal’ Public Schools As Motivating Factor: POLL

September 26, 2023

House Republicans Launch Probe into Biden Energy Secretary’s Disasterous Taxpayer-Funded EV Road Trip

September 26, 2023

IRS Grants Tax Extension to Feb. 15 for Mainers Affected by Hurricane Lee

September 26, 2023

Portland City Council to Consider $134,000 150-Bed Expansion to Homeless Shelter by Emergency Declaration

September 26, 2023
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login below or Register Now.

Lost password?

Register Now!

Already registered? Login.

A password will be e-mailed to you.