The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • Podcasts
  • About
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Maine ACLU Demands Portland Stop ‘Criminalizing Homelessness’, Calls Encampment Sweeps ‘Inherently Racist’
  • Pickett Mountain Mine: Unbridled Hypocrisy (Again) on Display in Augusta
  • Good Boy! South Portland Police K-9 Finds Burglary Suspect Hiding in Dumpster
  • Sex Therapist’s “Raising Sexually Healthy Children” Workshop Flyer Passed out to 1st and 3rd Graders in Maine
  • Trio of Arrests, Including Two NYC Men, Made in 6 Year Old Maine Arson and Murder Case
  • Feds Allege Amazon Uses Illegal Tactics to Hold Monopoly Over Online Retail
  • Voluntarily Homeless: Portland Spent $65,000 Offering Shelter and Housing to 100 “Unhoused Individuals” — Only 18 Accepted
  • Safety vs Privacy: Maine Lawmakers Weigh Proposals to Restrict State-Sponsored Spying
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Login
Thursday, September 28
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • Podcasts
  • About
  • Contact
The Maine Wire
Home » News » New law sets stage for future government takeover of health care in Maine
Healthcare

New law sets stage for future government takeover of health care in Maine

Nick LinderBy Nick LinderJuly 20, 2021Updated:July 20, 2021No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Universal health care is one step closer to becoming a reality in Maine.

LD 1045, sponsored by Rep. Heidi Brooks (D-Lewiston), a law that supports the eventual universalization of health care in Maine, made its way through the legislature this session.

Initially a sprawling 14-page bill, it’s final, chaptered law version was dialed back to only two-and-a-half pages.

LD 1045 became law without the signature of Gov. Janet Mills on July 1.

The original version outlined a detailed plan for the proposed takeover of Maine’s health care system, but the final version has two main provisions: the new universal “Maine Health Care Plan” and a new board established to develop and implement that plan.

The bill’s only language regarding the scope of the plan is that it will “provide for all medically necessary health care services for all residents of the State.” It notably goes no further in defining “medically necessary.”

That description is very vague and unclear as to what exactly would be covered under the plan, as well as what options individuals would still have for needs not deemed “medically necessary.”

Either way, a state takeover of the health care system is very unlikely to solve the problems Maine faces. A one-size-fits-all, top-down approach is not the answer. 

We can all agree that the current system of health care is dominated by unjustifiably rising costs and increasing barriers to care, both in Maine and across the nation. But the government seizing control of the entire market would eliminate viable choices that may prove more cost-effective and preferable, like direct primary care, to thousands of Mainers.

Statistic: Health insurance status distribution of the total population of Maine in 2019 | Statista
Find more statistics at Statista

As shown above in this graph from Statista based on 2019 data, only 8% of Mainers were without health insurance. This metric certainly does not warrant a state takeover of the entire health care market that would limit the choices of the other 92%.

The government should allow for a health care market that is increasingly manageable, affordable and provides as many options to Mainers as possible. A universal plan would likely make these priorities unattainable.

The lion’s share of the bill details how the “Maine Health Care Board” would be created, consisting of 17 members appointed by the governor, including five “employer members” and seven health care providers.

It adds an unconscionable level of bureaucracy to an already unprecedented expansion of government power.

The bill notably will only take effect, though, if the federal government passes legislation that allows states to obtain a waiver that would allow them to run a state-based universal health care plan that uses federal funds. So for now, the plan is essentially moot, but it will surely surge back into relevance if and when Congress passes that kind of legislation.

In the bill’s fiscal note, the only number that is mentioned is $10.9 billion. That is the Department of Health and Human Services’ estimate of the annual cost of “covering all medically necessary health services.”

$10.9 billion per year is a shockingly high number, especially when taken in the context of the $8.5 billion budget lawmakers recently passed to direct spending over the biennium.

Such a steep cost would surely demand additional state revenues in the form of increased taxes on hardworking Mainers.

In 2011, the Vermont Legislature enacted a law that established a universal health care system. It required a funding proposal to be developed within two years, but lawmakers failed to meet that deadline. 

The Boston Globe reported the plan “would nearly double the size of the state’s budget in the first year alone and require large tax increases for residents and businesses.” A similar outcome is all but guaranteed for Maine if such a plan to enact universal health care is approved in the future.

LD 1045 sets the stage for a disastrous and expensive government takeover of Maine’s health care system, destroying viable and flexible options used by tens of thousands of citizens. Mainers must now watch with a careful eye as health care legislation maneuvers its way through Congress in the future.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Biennial Budget Commentary department of health and human services DHHS direct primary care Featured health care health care costs health care provider health care reform health insurance healthcare Heidi Brooks LD 1045 Maine Health Care Act Maine Health Care Board Opinion public health The Boston Globe universal health care vermont
Previous ArticleLegislature sustains Gov. Mills’ veto of CMP takeover bill
Next Article Will pandemic-induced toll increases prove to be permanent?
Nick Linder

Nicholas Linder, of Cincinnati, is a communications Intern for Maine Policy Institute. He is going into his second year of studying finance and public policy analysis at The Ohio State University. On campus, he is involved with Students Consulting for Nonprofit Organizations and Business for Good.

Related Posts

Portland City Council to Consider $134,000 150-Bed Expansion to Homeless Shelter by Emergency Declaration

September 26, 2023

Natural Disaster Threatens Man-Made Disaster as Hurricane Lee Bears Down on Portland’s Growing Homeless Camp

September 15, 2023

City of Portland Claims Migrant Crisis an “Act of God”

September 15, 2023

Leave A Reply

Recent News

Maine ACLU Demands Portland Stop ‘Criminalizing Homelessness’, Calls Encampment Sweeps ‘Inherently Racist’

September 28, 2023

Good Boy! South Portland Police K-9 Finds Burglary Suspect Hiding in Dumpster

September 28, 2023

Sex Therapist’s “Raising Sexually Healthy Children” Workshop Flyer Passed out to 1st and 3rd Graders in Maine

September 28, 2023

Trio of Arrests, Including Two NYC Men, Made in 6 Year Old Maine Arson and Murder Case

September 27, 2023

Feds Allege Amazon Uses Illegal Tactics to Hold Monopoly Over Online Retail

September 27, 2023
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login below or Register Now.

Lost password?

Register Now!

Already registered? Login.

A password will be e-mailed to you.