AUGUSTA – Republican Gov. Paul R. LePage told Mainers on Saturday that electricity rates in the Pine Tree State are far too high and the state-mandated wind power industry is to blame.
“Maine’s energy costs are 10th highest in the nation, and our electric bills are 34 percent higher than the national average,” said the Governor. “But it does not have to be this way. Affordable energy is available right here in Maine and just across our northern border.”
LePage has been engaged in negotiations with Canadian officials regarding a deal that could drastically lower electricity rates Maine’s businesses and families pay. But LePage said our friends to the North are reluctant to do business with Maine because of King and Baldacci area policies that limit Maine’s use of hydro power and mandate the use of more expensive wind power.
“I traveled recently to Canada to meet with officials from Hydro Quebec, which has plenty of hydro power to sell at very affordable prices,” said LePage. “They told me that selling power to Maine is not worth it. And it’s all because Maine has a limit on how much renewable energy we can use, including hydropower.”
“Under Governors King and Baldacci, legislators enacted RPS — the Renewable Portfolio Standard — which restricts us to using only 100 megawatts of hydropower,” said LePage. “Hydro Quebec has 41,000 megawatts of energy to sell, but they sell it in 1,000 megawatts increments,” he said. “They wouldn’t even consider selling as little as 100 megawatts.”
“Here in Maine, we have over 700 megawatts of installed capacity for hydropower. It is clean, it is renewable and it is affordable. So why would we limit hydropower?” said LePage. “The answer is simple: Wind.”
Because of RPS, said LePage, the average residential consumer will pay $365 more in electricity over the next five years. He said RPS will cost the average industrial user more than $63,000 in the next five years.
“Folks, it doesn’t have to be this way,” said LePage. “That’s why I have introduced a bill to remove the 100-megawatt limit on renewable sources of energy, including hydropower.”
“Tell your legislators you want affordable electricity, and you want it now.”
Remove the 100-megawatt limit on renewable sources of energy, including hydropower.
” I agrre….”
Maine Power Options, a State operated buying group for towns and schools pays 8.9 cents to Constellation out of CT for over 220 million Kwh. A competitive company charges 5.6 cents or a difference of over 7 million dollars per year. When will the MPO be REQUIRED to get competitive bids?
Too much common sense in that proposal. The State doing something to benefit all people of Maine by lowering electric bills against the wishes of a few special interest groups.
RPS mandates NEW renewables replace renewables.
More stranded cost in the future? Stop WIND now.
Goggle wind mills in west texas its the worlds largest wind farm and they claim its cause a bunch of bad tbings happening
Maine Wind law is unconstitutional http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/maine-wind-law-is-unconstitutional?xg_source=facebookshare.
Gov. LePage continues to try to mislead Mainers. Read more here:
http://www.dirigoblue.com/2013/03/in-weekly-address-lepage-tries-to-mislead-the-public-again-on-hydropower/
What an assclown….
WHUT? Seriously – every day it’s a new thing…
If you read the law you site you are the one misleading the people I hope people are smart enough to see your con job The RPS limits the size of power plants that can be counted as “renewable” at 100MW, excepting wind farms. and that’s the point !!!!
@[100003253342767:2048:Norman Mitchell] Perhaps you should actually read my piece before you comment on it.
If this is about the environment and not about money their should be no cap wind power is a big government failure waste and causing the destruction of the Maine we natives Love ! Fill in the wet lands , Killing the wild life bird and bats , Causing Global warming threw deforestation and blasting off the mountains ! Read the wind Law and see that wind power plays by rule no one else can ! Special treatment for out of state interest out of state company’s and power for out of state city’s why don’t you look into the facts or are you paid of by big wind too ? why did Tom Carroll say this in the Bangor Daly news ? ” Tom Carroll, project coordinator with Patriot Renewables LLC, which is building wind farms in Dixfield, Woodstock and Carthage, said technically, the electricity his projects are creating is being sold to an entity in Massachusetts.” http://bangordailynews.com/2011/09/25/business/maine-doesnt-need-wind-power-group-says/
If this is about the environment and not about money their should be no cap wind power is a big government failure waste and causing the destruction of the Maine we natives Love ! Fill in the wet lands , Killing the wild life bird and bats , Causing Global warming threw deforestation and blasting off the mountains ! Read the wind Law and see that wind power plays by rule no one else can ! Special treatment for out of state interest out of state company’s and power for out of state city’s why don’t you look into the facts or are you paid of by big wind too ? why did Tom Carroll say this in the Bangor Daly news ? ” Tom Carroll, project coordinator with Patriot Renewables LLC, which is building wind farms in Dixfield, Woodstock and Carthage, said technically, the electricity his projects are creating is being sold to an entity in Massachusetts.” http://bangordailynews.com/2011/09/25/business/maine-doesnt-need-wind-power-group-says/
Vivienne Westwood Online Cheap Sale
Vivienne is an avid supporter of Greenpeace’s campaign to Save The Artic, and told The Guardian she is hoping to change climate change through fashion:
YSL’s New Vintage Collection Combines Eco
LV (Louis Vuitton): founder Louis Vuitton was founded in 1854, Louis Vuitton brand, the policy package to draw the woman soon became fashionable trend, 42 years later, you see the world top ten name brand bag. His son with his father, Louis Vuitton LV initials into planning the world since the world famous brand, is now affiliated with the French post-production of primary luxury goods group Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton. Spoiled as a top brand bags LV, like painting is the world top policy. Ten luxury brand bag. Purchase a genuine one to follow: brand handbags world rankings. Chanel produced a single type of class, costumes, jewelry, accessories, dress goods, perfumes, each product is known far and near, including luxury brands. More of her perfume and costume. Born in Italy in 1934, the company began as a garment, after having to promote their products into bags. Compared to see the world. 1941 Covery inception, is a family of six from the leather cobbler apprentice partner organization, the family room type job creation, from the conservative American baseball glove inspired, in fact, the luxury brand bag. victory of leather goods companies. Early 20th century, the United Kingdom Alfred Dunhill for the good gentleman has created a fertile time to smell the luxury brand, came out in elegant, refined products. Listen to the brand discount bags. Dunhill worked with the classical aristocratic British Wind victory combined. Gucci in Florence in 1921, was established. Association rankings.
I have always loved to wear what I call “costumes”–startling and chic ensembles that draw all eyes in a room to me, hopefully, to appreciate my sense of taste and style. (Never can I buy a simple suit–oh, maybe if it happened to be Chanel I could bring myself to do it.) Here, I was surrounded by such a bevy of stunning Saint Laurent beauty and sensibility, from the 1950’s to the new century, that I wanted to become it. I wanted to touch it, to eat and drink it, to steal the beautiful pieces, wear them, throw a cocktail and dinner party in them, and then give them back for M. Bergé to protect and keep.
jooouli
don’t regret it
you will love it
I have had some lovely compliments lately in dance classes from fellow students and friends about http://www.bhl-uk.com/products-nfl.asp.
Citizens who have taken the time to learn the FACTS (instead of being led astray by [foreign] corporate propaganda) know that the Governor speaks the truth. Please take the time to do independent research. It’s not too late to make decisions which are economiclly and environmentally and ethically sound.
People need to understand that a very high proportion of whatever power is produced by wind sites in Maine is contractually destined to go to Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut. Maine’s taxpayers, though, are footing the bill with subsidies provided to the developers and with higher rates on electricity bills to upgrade the power distribution system to ship the juice south.
The renewable mandates in those southern states is, largely, responsible for the destruction of habitat and scenic vistas in Maine. If people would take the time to study this issue, they will discover that there is no reason that Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut could not erect towers in their own backyards or coastal areas.
If those states were responsible for building coal powered generation facilities in Maine, the outcry would be deafening. Instead, because it is a liberal, ideological goal, wind turbines and the destruction they cause are ignored.