The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Cumberland County DA Weighs In to Defend Corrections Officer Who Allegedly Overstayed His Visa
  • Susan Collins Defends Her Position on Congressional Oversight of Nation’s Capital after Ted Cruz Charge
  • Maine Think Tank Urges Janet Mills to Stick to Her 2017 Position and Veto Expansion of Ranked Choice Voting
  • Border Patrol Busts 3,000 Foot Cartel Tunnel Connecting Mexico and San Diego
  • New Details on Portland Woman Identified as a Member of Antifa “Militia,” Threatened Agents
  • Westbrook Police Nab Gray Man Suspected Accused of Stealing Tools from Local Business
  • Bipartisan Bill Barring Maine Legislative Staff from Lobbying for One Year Signed into Law
  • Trump Admin Closes Biden-Era Loophole That Let China Scoop Up Americans’ DNA
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Saturday, June 21
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
The Maine Wire
Home » News » News » The failed War on Poverty
News

The failed War on Poverty

Steve RobinsonBy Steve RobinsonSeptember 16, 20146 Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Source: Heritage Foundation
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

As we mark the 50th anniversary of Lyndon B. Johnson’s War on Poverty, the U.S. Census Bureau is set to release information showing that America’s most costly war — $22 trillion has been spent on the anti-poverty effort — has been a abject failure.

“Since its beginning, U.S. taxpayers have spent $22 trillion on Johnson’s War on Poverty (in constant 2012 dollars). Adjusting for inflation, that’s three times more than was spent on all military wars since the American Revolution,” says Robert Rector, a Heritage Foundation senior research fellow, in a Daily Signal article Tuesday.

This welfare spending has come through more than 80 means-tested federal welfare programs — many of them administered by the states. These public assistance programs provide health care, housing, cash, food subsidies and even help buying home heating fuel. According to Rector, the total bill for welfare spending in the U.S. last year was $943 billion.

Source: Heritage Foundation
Source: Heritage Foundation

Despite this massive amount of welfare spending, victory in the War on Poverty has remained elusive. As Rector writes, “The present poverty rate is almost exactly the same as it was in 1967 a few years after the War on Poverty started. Census data actually shows that poverty has gotten worse over the last 40 years.”

The disconnect between increased welfare spending and stable poverty rates is a product both of ineffective anti-poverty programs and shifting understanding of what it means to be poor. Critics of the Great Society welfare programs have long argued that the modern welfare state is at best a temporary amelioration of poverty’s symptoms–and at worst a perverse incentive structure that actually keeps Americans stuck in a cycle of generational poverty. As for the shifting understanding of what it means to be poor, Rector writes:

According to government surveys, the typical family that Census identifies as poor has air conditioning, cable or satellite TV, and a computer in his home. Forty percent have a wide screen HDTV and another 40 percent have internet access. Three quarters of the poor own a car and roughly a third have two or more cars. (These numbers are not the result of the current bad economy pushing middle class families into poverty; instead, they reflect a steady improvement in living conditions among the poor for many decades.)

Although the modern welfare state has failed, by most measures, to eradicate poverty, there seems to be no end in sight to increased welfare spending. Data released this week by the U.S. Department of Agriculture showed that more than 46 million Americans are now on Food Stamps and more citizens than ever are enrolling in the medical welfare thanks to the Affordable Care Act’s proposed expansion of Medicaid.

Medicaid poverty Welfare
Previous ArticleVIDEO: Dem Vitelli supports welfare to illegal immigrants
Next Article HHS docs detail “high risk” security problems with HealthCare.gov
Steve Robinson
  • Twitter

Steve Robinson is the Editor-in-Chief of The Maine Wire. ‪He can be reached by email at Robinson@TheMaineWire.com.

Subscribe to Substack

Related Posts

Cumberland County DA Weighs In to Defend Corrections Officer Who Allegedly Overstayed His Visa

June 20, 2025

Susan Collins Defends Her Position on Congressional Oversight of Nation’s Capital after Ted Cruz Charge

June 20, 2025

Maine Think Tank Urges Janet Mills to Stick to Her 2017 Position and Veto Expansion of Ranked Choice Voting

June 20, 2025

<span class="dsq-postid" data-dsqidentifier="8870 http://www.themainewire.com/?p=8838">6 Comments

  1. Glen Hutchins on September 17, 2014 5:21 AM

    Now why would the progressives want to end poverty? It would put why to many people out of a job. What would Strimling do?

  2. Ray Bald on September 17, 2014 7:06 AM

    Wealth and poverty are relative terms and are constantly changing. Someone living in poverty in the USA would actually be considered wealthy in most of the rest of the world. No matter how you slice it, the overriding issue is that government assistance programs should be designed to be true safety nets in which temporary assistance is provided to those who find themselves in economic trouble through no fault of their own and are provided relief with the goal that they once again become self sufficient. To that end and consistent with the concept of subsidiarity, the federal government should be the last one in line to provide assistance. Help should first come from those who are closest to the person in need (i.e. family, friends,), then progressively outward to resources that are furthest away from problem (i.e. church or local non-profit, general assistance from town or city, state assistance, then finally federal assistance). Those who are closest to the problem are most often the best candidates to solve the problem.

  3. Norman Linnell on September 17, 2014 7:06 AM

    The $22 TRILLION wasted on the war on poverty doesn’t include the monumental hidden costs associated with the 12 to 40 MILLION illegal alien invaders lured to the USA by the welfare state !

  4. Eugenio Freitag on October 5, 2014 11:53 AM

    jooouli

  5. maillot de l om on October 7, 2014 1:57 AM

    Its like you learn my thoughts! You appear to know so much about this, such as you wrote the e book in it or something. I believe that you simply can do with a few p.c. to pressure the message house a little bit, but other than that, that is great blog. An excellent read. I’ll certainly be back.|

  6. equipaciones de futbol on October 7, 2014 5:55 PM

    These are actually enormous ideas in on the topic of blogging. You have touched some nice points here. Any way keep up wrinting.|

Leave A Reply

Subscribe to Substack
Recent News

Cumberland County DA Weighs In to Defend Corrections Officer Who Allegedly Overstayed His Visa

June 20, 2025

Susan Collins Defends Her Position on Congressional Oversight of Nation’s Capital after Ted Cruz Charge

June 20, 2025

Maine Think Tank Urges Janet Mills to Stick to Her 2017 Position and Veto Expansion of Ranked Choice Voting

June 20, 2025

Border Patrol Busts 3,000 Foot Cartel Tunnel Connecting Mexico and San Diego

June 20, 2025

New Details on Portland Woman Identified as a Member of Antifa “Militia,” Threatened Agents

June 20, 2025
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.