The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Investigations
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Bangor Man Arrested on Numerous Child Sexual Assault Charges
  • Emergency Clarification of Maine’s Ban on Paper Statement Fees Signed into Law
  • Maine State Police Bomb Squad Responds to Bowdoinham Mortar Round, Winslow Grenade
  • 75 Maine House Democrats Went Silent on Faulkingham — The Same Silence Mainers Keep Hearing on Fraud
  • Shooting of 22-Year-Old Woman in Lewiston Leads to Murder Charges for Suspect
  • Trump Signs Executive Order Aimed at Strengthening Federal Election Integrity and Mail Ballot Security
  • MSP Investigating Fatal Crash on I-95 in Newport
  • Sanford Man Faces Multiple Theft Charges in Alleged Unlicensed CDL Training Scheme
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Wednesday, April 1
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Investigations
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Commentary » Hitchcock: Why the “Fair Pint” Beer Bill is Not Needed
Commentary

Hitchcock: Why the “Fair Pint” Beer Bill is Not Needed

Nathan HitchcockBy Nathan HitchcockApril 13, 2015Updated:November 16, 20172 Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

On Monday, Governor LePage vetoed LD 122, An Act to Standardize Pints of Beer Sold in Maine, proposed by Sen. John Patrick, D-Rumford. This bill would subject all restaurants that serve pints of beer to government regulations to make sure their pint glasses actually hold sixteen ounces of beer.  Before reaching the Governor, this bill passed in the State House with opposition from Republicans, and passed unanimously in the State Senate.

All beer lovers want to know they are getting their money’s worth, so why would the Governor veto this bill?  To put it simply, because we already have a way to make sure this does not happen.

It is called the free market.

The free market will make sure restaurants actually serve a full pint, or else lose money to competitors.  Adding another regulation to the restaurant business could actually cost restaurants more money to comply, which translate into higher prices for beer.

It is bad business to try and fool customers into paying for less beer, both on a moral level and a practical level.  If a particular restaurant is fooling its customers, it runs the risk of people finding out.  The moment a customer starts thinking he or she is not getting all that he or she paid for is the starting point for correction.  That person will likely not come back to the restaurant, and will likely talk about the experience, both in person and in online review articles.  Once the word spreads, customers will be wary to go there, and will opt for competitors.  These businesses will either adjust their pricing or their serving methods, like actually serving pints, to gain business back.  If they do not, the businesses will go under.  As the Governor put it, people will “vote with their feet, and their wallet.”  This is the natural “fair pint” beer bill, because day-to-day business makes sure restaurants serve customers what they order.  Bad business hurts reputation, and no business wants that.

Involving the Government in a problem solved by natural business only prolongs action, and can be costly to the taxpayer and to the business, and while people may be getting a “fair pint” of beer, the cost of the pint will increase.  First of all, adding new regulations requires the Government to hire people to enforce the law, and these new salaries cost the taxpayers.  In addition, these regulations will impose a standardized way of determining what a pint actually is, and will require tests and visits, and maybe even standardized pint glasses that are government approved, all of which cost money, and will all be imposed on the taxpayers, either through higher taxes or higher costs for beer.  Either way, involving the Government is costly, especially more than leaving this to the free market.

After the Governor vetoing the bill, the State Senate, which first voted to pass this bill unanimously, voted 20-14 to sustain the veto, and thus this bill will not become law this time around.  Whenever you think a restaurant has not given you a whole pint of beer after you have ordered one, do not rely on the government.  It takes too much time to get anything accomplished about it and may lead to an increased cost for your beer.  Take action yourself and find another restaurant, and watch the business suffer for not being a fair business.

 

beer Featured LePage Maine Opinion regulations
Previous ArticleRobinson: Advice for the Democrats
Next Article Congressman Bruce Poliquin Raises $700,000 in First Quarter
Nathan Hitchcock

Nathan Hitchcock is currently a law student at the University of Maine School of Law and volunteers as a researcher for the Maine Heritage Policy Center. Prior to law school, he attended Hillsdale College in Michigan, where he earned a B.A. in Political Economy.

Latest News

75 Maine House Democrats Went Silent on Faulkingham — The Same Silence Mainers Keep Hearing on Fraud

April 1, 2026

Maine’s Celebrity Democrat Oyster King Called Out For Epstein Connections Amid U.S. Senate Race

March 31, 2026

Opinion: The ITC Must Stop Overlooking Maine’s Working Coast

March 31, 2026
0 0 votes
Article Rating
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
George Friant
George Friant
10 years ago

If you are so concerned stick to bottled or caned beer, a law because some one got too much head? What next….

0
John Frary
John Frary
10 years ago

Got to regulate something today. Got to protect the Little People from Big Beer or Big Glassware or something.

0
Recent News

Bangor Man Arrested on Numerous Child Sexual Assault Charges

April 1, 2026

Emergency Clarification of Maine’s Ban on Paper Statement Fees Signed into Law

April 1, 2026

Maine State Police Bomb Squad Responds to Bowdoinham Mortar Round, Winslow Grenade

April 1, 2026

Shooting of 22-Year-Old Woman in Lewiston Leads to Murder Charges for Suspect

April 1, 2026

Trump Signs Executive Order Aimed at Strengthening Federal Election Integrity and Mail Ballot Security

April 1, 2026
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

wpDiscuz