The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Cumberland County DA Weighs In to Defend Corrections Officer Who Allegedly Overstayed His Visa
  • Susan Collins Defends Her Position on Congressional Oversight of Nation’s Capital after Ted Cruz Charge
  • Maine Think Tank Urges Janet Mills to Stick to Her 2017 Position and Veto Expansion of Ranked Choice Voting
  • Border Patrol Busts 3,000 Foot Cartel Tunnel Connecting Mexico and San Diego
  • New Details on Portland Woman Identified as a Member of Antifa “Militia,” Threatened Agents
  • Westbrook Police Nab Gray Man Suspected Accused of Stealing Tools from Local Business
  • Bipartisan Bill Barring Maine Legislative Staff from Lobbying for One Year Signed into Law
  • Trump Admin Closes Biden-Era Loophole That Let China Scoop Up Americans’ DNA
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Sunday, June 22
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
The Maine Wire
Home » News » News » Despite new internet privacy law, your private data can still be sold and shared without consent
News

Despite new internet privacy law, your private data can still be sold and shared without consent

William RolfeBy William RolfeJune 12, 2019Updated:June 12, 2019No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Governor Janet Mills last week signed into law LD 946 “An Act To Protect the Privacy of Online Customer Information”. The bill, sponsored by Sen. Shenna Bellows, bars Internet Service Providers (ISPs) from selling users data without their expressed consent, making it one of the strictest regulations of ISPs in the country. Despite this, LD 946 does nothing to protect consumers from one of the main sources of privacy violation: content providers.

Companies such as Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, Hulu and Netflix are some of the most well-known content providers. These outfits generally provide a service to the consumer, much like ISP’s, while at the same time collecting, using, and selling their data without consent. Additionally, many are not aware that these content providers often share their data with each other, allowing them to compile thorough profiles on users.

Undoubtedly, Facebook is one of the most widely-used content providers. For years, little was known about the extent to which Facebook uses the data it compiles on its users. However, due to recent Congressional scrutiny, more light has been shed on exactly how Facebook uses its users’ data. In fact, The New York Times discovered that Facebook shares their data with Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Spotify, Netflix and more than 150 other companies. Nothing in LD 946 prevents Facebook from continuing this practice.

For years, Facebook has boasted that it has compiled more than five-thousanddata points on more than 230 million Americans. Additionally, many consumers are not aware that they have access to the data that Facebook has compiled. If you would like to see just how much data Facebook has on you, you can do so by clicking here.

I would warn you that downloading all of your Facebook data may take a substantial amount of time. I was surprised to learn that Facebook has compiled more than 2 gigabytes of data pertaining to me. Unfortunately, LD 946 does not apply to the data that Facebook has compiled on its users. Thus, the bill ultimately does nothing to prevent consumer’s privacy from being violated.

The bill may address data privacy with ISPs, but they are only one-half of the equation. What good is LD 946 when tech giants will continue to share and sell your information? LD 946 simply picks winners and losers without preventing some of the most egregious privacy violators from selling or sharing consumer data.

Additionally, LD 946 provides consumers no protection from the government accessing their data without their authorization. I do not contend the fact that certain circumstances may arise in which the government would need access to a citizens data without their authorization. However, there are other, more trivial reasons such as Maine accessing citizens’ personal location data to “analyze traffic patterns.” For a purpose such as this, the State should be required to have citizens’ authorization in order to access their data.

Why is it that ISPs are the only parties affected by this new laws? None of the safeguards established within LD 946 apply to the biggest abusers of consumer privacy in content providers, nor does it restrict the government’s ability to access your data without your consent. So you’re really not much better off than you were before.

If the objective of this bill was to protect consumer data, I am afraid it comes up well short of doing so. If the objective of this bill was to arbitrarily pick winners and losers in the tech arena and declare a pretend victory while allowing consumers’ data to continue being shared and sold without their consent, it has surpassed expectations.

amazon apple Commentary content provider facebook Featured google hulu internet internet service provider netflix Opinion privacy private information tech policy technology
Previous ArticleHow Augusta overcharges you for milk
Next Article Don’t cap Maine’s charter schools
William Rolfe

William Rolfe is a United States Air Force veteran and an intern at The Maine Heritage Policy Center. After being honorably discharged from the United States Air Force, he attended Central Maine Community College where he graduated with an associates degree in general studies. He currently attends the University of New Hampshire where he majors in social work, and hopes to one day attend law school so that he can advocate for fellow veterans.

Subscribe to Substack

Related Posts

Cumberland County DA Weighs In to Defend Corrections Officer Who Allegedly Overstayed His Visa

June 20, 2025

Susan Collins Defends Her Position on Congressional Oversight of Nation’s Capital after Ted Cruz Charge

June 20, 2025

Maine Think Tank Urges Janet Mills to Stick to Her 2017 Position and Veto Expansion of Ranked Choice Voting

June 20, 2025

Leave A Reply

Subscribe to Substack
Recent News

Cumberland County DA Weighs In to Defend Corrections Officer Who Allegedly Overstayed His Visa

June 20, 2025

Susan Collins Defends Her Position on Congressional Oversight of Nation’s Capital after Ted Cruz Charge

June 20, 2025

Maine Think Tank Urges Janet Mills to Stick to Her 2017 Position and Veto Expansion of Ranked Choice Voting

June 20, 2025

Border Patrol Busts 3,000 Foot Cartel Tunnel Connecting Mexico and San Diego

June 20, 2025

New Details on Portland Woman Identified as a Member of Antifa “Militia,” Threatened Agents

June 20, 2025
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.