The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • About
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Maine Wire TV: Gary Drinkwater and Heidi Sampson on School Vaccine Mandates and Education Reform
  • Question A Helps Fix the Mess Socialists Made in Portland
  • Pro-Life Group Thinks Mills’ Late-Term Abortion Bill Lacks Votes to Pass
  • House Dems Vote Against Letting Healthcare Workers Who Refused COVID-19 Jabs Return to Jobs
  • Portland Police Seize 67 Grams of Fentanyl in Arrest
  • NYC Mayor Says City Considering Housing Asylum Seekers in ‘Private Residences’
  • Notorious Cold War Spy Dies In Prison
  • Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows Claims Credible Threat Made Against Her Life on Social Media
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Login
Tuesday, June 6
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • About
  • Contact
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Maine’s high court strikes down warrantless blood tests
News

Maine’s high court strikes down warrantless blood tests

Nick MurrayBy Nick MurrayJanuary 30, 2020Updated:January 30, 2020No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

On Tuesday, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court struck down a law requiring police officers–without a warrant–to draw a blood sample from individuals on the scene of a deadly crash. Maintaining the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure, the Court ruled that this principle applies to the taking of blood, even in “exigent” circumstances such as the scene of a fatal highway accident, where first responders must react quickly.

The question arose when Randall Weddle appealed his conviction on counts of manslaughter, operating under the influence, and other related charges stemming from a serious accident involving multiple vehicles in March of 2016, in which the tractor-trailer logging truck he was driving overturned on Route 17.

The officer on the scene believed that Weddle may have caused the accident, but without probable cause to suspect an intoxicated driver, ordered Weddle’s blood to be drawn. Later, evidence taken from Weddle’s truck showed an open, three-quarters full bottle of liquor. The trial court convicted Weddle, and on his appeal, he challenged the constitutionality of his blood test.

Last year, in the First Session of the 129th Maine Legislature, lawmakers passed, and Governor Mills signed, LD 264, a bill that allowed law enforcement to conduct roadside blood tests on the scene of an accident as described in Title 29-A Sec. 2522. Subsection 2 directs law enforcement to “cause a blood test to be administered” to a driver as soon as is practicable, as the officer deems appropriate.

The law mandates the operator of the vehicle submit to the test. Subsection 3 allows blood tests taken before the determination of probable cause to be used as evidence, if after the fact, probable cause was eventually obtained.

In early 2019, LD 264 was supported by all manner of special interest groups including AAA, Maine Municipal Association, Maine Sherriff’s Assocaition, and the Bureau of Highway Safety, many arguing that it would make it easier for police officers to collect evidence on scene. The only groups who submitted testimony opposing the bill were the County Commissioners Association, the ACLU, and The Maine Heritage Policy Center.

Testifying for MHPC, policy analyst Adam Crepeau cited the case of Birchfield v. North Dakota, in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that blood tests are much more intrusive, and thus, constitutionally different from breath tests. The Maine Supreme Judicial Court, in its ruling on Weddle, also cited Birchfield in overturning the statute.

Explaining that the “passage of this bill as is could be subject to constitutional issues if a law enforcement officer administers or orders blood to be drawn without a warrant where no exigent circumstances exist and the individual did not consent,” Crepeau almost exactly described the situation the court observed in Mr. Weddle’s case.

Although the court ultimately struck down the change in law contained in LD 264, it upheld Weddle’s conviction. It ruled that since the officer who administered the blood draw was following the letter of the law at the time, it could not throw out the case wholesale. Weddle will still be held accountable for his role in that fatal crash in 2016, but citizens will no longer be forced to submit to an intrusive blood test because they are present on the scene of an accident.

ACLU Commentary Constitution constitutional government constitutional rights Featured fourth amendment Maine Heritage Policy Center Opinion
Previous ArticleBipartisan bill would unleash tiny homes in Maine
Next Article Federal anti-smoking bill would infantilize adults
Nick Murray
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Nick Murray, a resident of Poland, currently serves as Director of Policy with Maine Policy Institute, developing MPI's policy research, analysis, and strategic advocacy priorities. He is the author of numerous articles and publications such as the 50-State Emergency Powers Scorecard, Long-Term Growth vs. Short-Term Gimmicks: Maine's Economy and Gov. Mills' Second Biennial Budget, Sticker Shock: Maine's Burdensome Vehicle Inspection Mandate, and COVID Catastrophe: the Consequences of Societal Shutdowns.

Related Posts

Pro-Life Group Thinks Mills’ Late-Term Abortion Bill Lacks Votes to Pass

June 6, 2023

House Dems Vote Against Letting Healthcare Workers Who Refused COVID-19 Jabs Return to Jobs

June 6, 2023

Portland Police Seize 67 Grams of Fentanyl in Arrest

June 6, 2023

Leave A Reply

Recent News

Maine Wire TV: Gary Drinkwater and Heidi Sampson on School Vaccine Mandates and Education Reform

June 6, 2023

Question A Helps Fix the Mess Socialists Made in Portland

June 6, 2023

Pro-Life Group Thinks Mills’ Late-Term Abortion Bill Lacks Votes to Pass

June 6, 2023

House Dems Vote Against Letting Healthcare Workers Who Refused COVID-19 Jabs Return to Jobs

June 6, 2023

Portland Police Seize 67 Grams of Fentanyl in Arrest

June 6, 2023
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login below or Register Now.

Lost password?

Register Now!

Already registered? Login.

A password will be e-mailed to you.