The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • About
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Mills’ Late-Term Abortion Bill Gets Last Minute Work Session for Thursday Afternoon
  • Maine Republicans Score Tentative Victory in Delaying Trans Trafficking Bill
  • Lawmakers Nix Public School Transparency Bill Favored by Bipartisan Majority of Mainers
  • Asylum Seekers Staying in Sanford Inn Will Soon Have to Find Another Place To Stay
  • Chellie Pingree Says “No One Is Coming For Your Gas Stove” But Daughter Hannah Pingree Disagrees
  • New England Energy Prices Have Increased as Demand Has Declined Due to Climate Policies, Report Finds
  • Gardiner High School Implements Controversial New “American Flag Only” Policy Following Student Clash
  • Taxes in Portland Could Rise by 10 Percent If State Declines to Help With Asylum Seeker Crisis: WGME
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Login
Wednesday, June 7
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • About
  • Contact
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Bennett, Grohoski Pitch Overhaul to Mills’ $447M Spending Bill
News

Bennett, Grohoski Pitch Overhaul to Mills’ $447M Spending Bill

Steve RobinsonBy Steve RobinsonDecember 13, 2022Updated:December 13, 2022No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

State Sens. Rick Bennett (R-Oxford) and Nicole Grohoski (D-Hancock) on Tuesday pitched a somewhat slimmer version of Democratic Gov. Janet Mills’ $446 million spending package, which failed last week to pass as an emergency measure.

“We offer, Sen. Grohosoki and I, offer our proposal in a constructive spirit,” said Bennett.

Bennett said he continues to believe that a large spending package ought to go through the public hearing process, but that he hoped the bipartisan proposal could move the initiative along.

“Spending our surplus accounts dry leaves no money to deal with other pressing issues such as our opioid epidemic, our failing nursing homes, and the dire shortage of direct care workers for people who have been promised services,” he said.

“It’s clear to me, and I think to all our colleagues in the legislature, that many of our neighbors are in urgent need of heating and housing relief,” said Grohoski.

“The majority of the feedback I’ve been receiving from constituents over the past couple of days about this proposal is that the checks are too small for people who are really are in need and too large for others,” she said.

Grohoski said the proposal would use state data on energy consumption and costs to more finely target the money. The plan calls for cutting the amount of direct payments to Maine residents almost in half while more accurately targeting the checks toward the low-income end of the spectrum.

The proposal would use a sliding scale up to 300 percent of the federal poverty line to allocate the checks. That means a family of five with combined income over $97,410 would not be eligible for any money. Nor would a single individual making more than $40,770.

Whereas the Mills proposal used federal Medicaid dollars originally intended for nursing homes and individuals with traumatic brain injuries, the senators want to leave that $160 million alone.

On housing, Bennett and Grohoski want to allocate another $15 million to the Maine Housing Authority as a short-term solution to cover the end of the federal Emergency Rental Assistance program on Dec. 31.

The amendment would preserve Mills’ original request for additional funding for the Low-income Home Energy Assistance Program, which Maine Housing says is already adequately funded through next July.

Mills’ larger spending bill, which she asked the Legislature to pass on an emergency basis, failed to get two-thirds support in the State Senate on Dec. 7.

Republican senators unanimously voted against the proposal, arguing that a bill so large should have public hearings. Bennett maintained his insistence Tuesday that the bill should go through a public hearing.

You can read a document the pair distributed to some reporters here:

5d5bf79f-510a-4984-b76b-530b3fa50a75Download

Previous ArticleMaine Lobstermen Protest Portland Whole Foods’ Decision to Boycott Lobster
Next Article New York Times Coins “Tripledemic” to Urge Return of Masking
Steve Robinson
  • Twitter

Steve Robinson is the Editor-in-Chief of The Maine Wire. ‪He can be reached by email at Robinson@TheMaineWire.com.

Related Posts

Mills’ Late-Term Abortion Bill Gets Last Minute Work Session for Thursday Afternoon

June 7, 2023

Maine Republicans Score Tentative Victory in Delaying Trans Trafficking Bill

June 7, 2023

Lawmakers Nix Public School Transparency Bill Favored by Bipartisan Majority of Mainers

June 7, 2023

Leave A Reply

Recent News

Mills’ Late-Term Abortion Bill Gets Last Minute Work Session for Thursday Afternoon

June 7, 2023

Maine Republicans Score Tentative Victory in Delaying Trans Trafficking Bill

June 7, 2023

Lawmakers Nix Public School Transparency Bill Favored by Bipartisan Majority of Mainers

June 7, 2023

Asylum Seekers Staying in Sanford Inn Will Soon Have to Find Another Place To Stay

June 7, 2023

Chellie Pingree Says “No One Is Coming For Your Gas Stove” But Daughter Hannah Pingree Disagrees

June 7, 2023
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login below or Register Now.

Lost password?

Register Now!

Already registered? Login.

A password will be e-mailed to you.