The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • China Tries Getting Rich In America’s Backyard
  • Rockland Police Search for Man in Connection to Reported Assault
  • Residential and Condo Associations in Maine Can No Longer Ban Members from Installing EV Chargers
  • Angus King Co-Sponsors Republican-Led Bill Mandating Steps to Combat Chinese Espionage
  • Here Are the Tax and Fee Increases Mainers Can Expect from the Budget Janet Mills Signed into Law on Monday
  • Maine Wildlife Chief on Covering Up Dark Web Drug Scandal Involving Ex-Husband: “can’t talk about personnel…”
  • “Environmental” Group Trashing Maine Mills Actually Opposes Two Clean-Energy Sources — Oops!
  • ICE Agents Face a Massive Five-Fold Uptick in Assaults While Carrying Out Their Duties
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Tuesday, June 24
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
The Maine Wire
Home » News » News » Free Speech Case Tests Whether Anti-Discrimination Laws Can Compel Artistic Work
News

Free Speech Case Tests Whether Anti-Discrimination Laws Can Compel Artistic Work

Steve RobinsonBy Steve RobinsonDecember 5, 2022Updated:December 5, 2022No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing yet another case that will determine whether LGBT activists can compel artists to produce creative works that violate their sincerely held religious beliefs.

The case, 303 Creative v. Elenis, involves Lorie Smith, a devout Christian who specializes in designing websites.

Smith wants to expand her business to include the designing of websites; however, she does not want to design website for same-sex couples because doing so would violate her religious beliefs regarding marriage. She wants to post a message on her business’s website informing potential customers that she only creates websites for marriages that reflect her faith-informed view that marriage is an institution that involves a man and a woman.

That message, however, would violate the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA), which would require her to create custom websites celebrating same-sex marriages and prohibit such statements.

Importantly, Smith’s site says — and the state of Colorado acknowledges as much — that she will work for clients regardless of their sexual orientation. She said she would happily provide web design for a gay man who operates an animal shelter, but she will not perform artistic work celebrating the specific act of same-sex marriage.

In 2016, Smith brought her case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. She argued that enforcing CADA against her was a violation of her First Amendment right to freedom of speech and free exercise of religion. The Court rejected her argument, ruling that the government has the authority and the power to force Smith to create art and convey messages that run contrary to her sincerely held religious beliefs.

The court also upheld a provision of CADA that creates an exception allowing secular artists to decline to engage in certain speech.

There are two questions before the SCOTUS.

The first is whether government can compel speech that is contrary to an artist’s religious beliefs violates the artist’s First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and free exercise of religion.

The second is whether CADA and similar laws can create secular exemptions but not religious ones.

In February, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Smith’s case, but only with regard to the alleged violation of her right to free speech.

This is not the first time the Supreme Court has dealt with the tension between religious liberty and Colorado’s anti-discrimination law.

In 2018, the court ruled in favor, narrowly, of Jack Phillips, a Christian baker who refused to make cakes for same-sex weddings. That ruling, however, relied on the apparent targeting of Phillips by Colorado officials, so the tension was left unresolved.

Four years later, the composition of the court has shifted in a more conservative direction, so many court watchers are expecting a win for Smith — and for religious freedom.

Previous ArticleTrump Says “Twitter Files” Revelations Allow For Termination of Constitution
Next Article Bangor Struggling to Clean Up All the Needles Government Is Handing Out
Steve Robinson
  • Twitter

Steve Robinson is the Editor-in-Chief of The Maine Wire. ‪He can be reached by email at Robinson@TheMaineWire.com.

Subscribe to Substack

Related Posts

China Tries Getting Rich In America’s Backyard

June 24, 2025

Rockland Police Search for Man in Connection to Reported Assault

June 24, 2025

Residential and Condo Associations in Maine Can No Longer Ban Members from Installing EV Chargers

June 24, 2025

Leave A Reply

Subscribe to Substack
Recent News

China Tries Getting Rich In America’s Backyard

June 24, 2025

Rockland Police Search for Man in Connection to Reported Assault

June 24, 2025

Residential and Condo Associations in Maine Can No Longer Ban Members from Installing EV Chargers

June 24, 2025

Angus King Co-Sponsors Republican-Led Bill Mandating Steps to Combat Chinese Espionage

June 24, 2025

Here Are the Tax and Fee Increases Mainers Can Expect from the Budget Janet Mills Signed into Law on Monday

June 24, 2025
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.