The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Investigations
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Supreme Court Rules 8-1 to Strike Down Colorado’s Ban on LGBTQ Conversion Therapy for Minors
  • Alleged Alcohol-Related Crash Leaves Bucksport Man Dead
  • Portland MDEA Bust Leads to Arrest of New York Man with a Pound of Cocaine and Nearly $40k in Cash
  • Westbrook Man Arrested on Child Porn Charges Following Months-Long Investigation
  • Scumbag Steals from Make-a-Wish Donation Jar in Clinton
  • Motorcyclist Killed in Three Vehicle Crash in Raymond
  • Mainers Bear Nation’s 5th Highest Tax Burden
  • Lewiston City Council to Decide Future of Colisée With Proposed $250,000 Loan Vote
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Tuesday, March 31
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Investigations
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
The Maine Wire
Home » News » News » Maine Health Care Workers Ask Supreme Court to Decide Whether Their Employers Violated Federal Anti-Discrimination Laws When Complying with Gov. Mills’ Controversial COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate
News

Maine Health Care Workers Ask Supreme Court to Decide Whether Their Employers Violated Federal Anti-Discrimination Laws When Complying with Gov. Mills’ Controversial COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate

Libby PalanzaBy Libby PalanzaAugust 15, 2023Updated:August 16, 2023No Comments3 Mins Read2K Views
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Maine health care employers may have to defend themselves before the U.S. Supreme Court against an allegation that they violated federal anti-discrimination laws in their efforts to comply with Gov. Janet Mills’ (D) controversial COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

Maine health care workers who were fired during the COVID-19 pandemic for being unvaccinated — despite requesting a religious exemption to the state’s mandate — have petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari asking the Court to weigh in on the lawsuit they brought against their employers.

The case — Alicia Lowe, et al., v. Janet Mills, et al. — was last heard by the First Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this year.

Liberty Counsel, the nonprofit the law firm handling the case, has argued that in complying with Mills Administration’s vaccine mandate — which did not allow employers to offer a testing option for unvaccinated employees — the employers violated the health care workers’ federally protected rights.

According to Liberty Counsel, the petition asks the Supreme Court to provide answers to two main questions:

  • “Whether compliance with state laws directly contrary to Title VII’s requirement to provide a reasonable accommodation may serve as an undue hardship justifying an employer’s noncompliance with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.”
  • “Whether a state law that requires employers to deny without any consideration all requests by employees for a religious accommodation, contrary to Title VII’s religious nondiscrimination provision, is preempted by Title VII and the Supremacy Clause.”

In a press release sent out by Liberty Counsel Tuesday morning, the group noted that Justice Neil Gorsuch commented two years ago on the situation faced by these health care workers:

This case presents an important constitutional question, a serious error, and an irreparable injury. Where many other States have adopted religious exemptions, Maine has charted a different course. There, healthcare workers who have served on the front line of a pandemic for the last 18 months are now being fired and their practices shuttered. All for adhering to their constitutionally protected religious beliefs. Their plight is worthy of our attention.

It remains to be seen whether the Supreme Court will ultimately decide to hear their case. In order for a case to make its way in front of the Court, at least four Justices must agree to grant the petitioner a writ of certiorari.

An earlier version of this story misstated the defendants named in the petition. The petition filed this week pertains only to the employers’ alleged violation of their employees Title VII protections. The article has been corrected.

Previous ArticleColleges Skirt Supreme Court Ruling Barring Race-Based Admissions By Asking About ‘Identity’
Next Article Maine’s Community Colleges Still Mandating COVID-19 Shots for Some Students
Libby Palanza

Libby Palanza is a reporter for the Maine Wire and a lifelong Mainer. She graduated from Harvard University with a degree in Government and History. She can be reached at [email protected].

Latest News

Supreme Court Rules 8-1 to Strike Down Colorado’s Ban on LGBTQ Conversion Therapy for Minors

March 31, 2026

Alleged Alcohol-Related Crash Leaves Bucksport Man Dead

March 31, 2026

Portland MDEA Bust Leads to Arrest of New York Man with a Pound of Cocaine and Nearly $40k in Cash

March 31, 2026

Comments are closed.

Recent News

Supreme Court Rules 8-1 to Strike Down Colorado’s Ban on LGBTQ Conversion Therapy for Minors

March 31, 2026

Alleged Alcohol-Related Crash Leaves Bucksport Man Dead

March 31, 2026

Portland MDEA Bust Leads to Arrest of New York Man with a Pound of Cocaine and Nearly $40k in Cash

March 31, 2026

Westbrook Man Arrested on Child Porn Charges Following Months-Long Investigation

March 31, 2026

Scumbag Steals from Make-a-Wish Donation Jar in Clinton

March 31, 2026
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.