The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • U.S. Stops Enrolling New Hospices and Home Healthcare Agencies in Medicare As Vance Blocks $1.4 Billion in Funding
  • Hermon Burglary Leads to Two Arrests And Drug Seizure
  • Game Warden Killed in Avon Plane Crash
  • Welcome to Maine, Mr. Vice President — Now Let’s Expose the Fraud Machine
  • Lead Maine Hosts Ranked-Choice Voting Forum Ahead of Crowded 2026 Republican Gubernatorial Primary
  • Contentious Hearing Over Maine Girl Dads Ballot Initiative Puts Bellows’ Role Under Scrutiny
  • Gorham Ballot Error Raises Questions After Absentee Votes Sent Before Final Budget Approval
  • Lewiston Voters Reject $130 Million School Budget Amid Tax Concerns and Citywide Frustration
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Wednesday, May 13
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
The Maine Wire
Home » News » News » Chick-Fil-A Settles For $4.4 Million in Lawsuit Alleging Chain of False Advertising, “Secretly” Up-Charging Delivery Customers
News

Chick-Fil-A Settles For $4.4 Million in Lawsuit Alleging Chain of False Advertising, “Secretly” Up-Charging Delivery Customers

Libby PalanzaBy Libby PalanzaOctober 20, 2023Updated:October 20, 20232 Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Chick-fil-A has agreed to pay out $4.4 million to customers after facing accusations of covertly inflating food prices on their delivery app.

Less than a month ago, several individuals filed a federal lawsuit alleging that during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the fast food chain advertised “free” and “low-cost” delivery, only to “secretly” mark up the price of individual food items on these orders by 25% to 30% compared to regular menu prices.

“On delivery orders only, Chick-fil-A secretly marks up food prices for delivery orders by a hefty 25-30%,” the lawsuit claims, according to Insider. “In other words, the identical order of a 30-count chicken nuggets costs approximately $5-6 more when ordered for delivery than when ordered via the same mobile app for pickup, or when ordered in-store.”

According to the plaintiffs who filed the lawsuit, they sought legal relief on behalf of themselves and those nationwide who “ordered food delivery through the Chick-fil-A mobile app or website, and were assessed higher delivery charges than represented.”

“By falsely marketing a free or low-cost delivery charge, Chick-fil-A deceives consumers into making online food purchases they otherwise would not make,” the plaintiffs argue.

Eligible individuals will receive a payment of $29.95 either in the form of cash or a gift card.

Settlement administrators will contact eligible individuals via email to alert them that the refund is available to them.

Also as part of the settlement, Chick-Fil-A has agreed to add a disclosure to their app and website informing customers that prices may be higher for delivery orders compared to their regular menu prices.

Mark-ups for delivery orders placed through platforms such as Uber Eats and DoorDash are nothing new, but it was the alleged lack of transparency on Chick-fil-A’s part that spurred the plaintiffs to pursue legal action against the fast food chain.

Chick-fil-A’s decision to settle the lawsuit does not reflect an admission of guilt on their part.

Previous ArticleMills Admin Releases Report on Two Years and Nearly $1 Billion of COVID Relief Spending
Next Article Jim Jordan Ousted As Speaker Nominee, Caucus Expected to Elect New Designee Tuesday
Libby Palanza

Libby Palanza is a reporter for the Maine Wire and a lifelong Mainer. She graduated from Harvard University with a degree in Government and History. She can be reached at [email protected].

Latest News

U.S. Stops Enrolling New Hospices and Home Healthcare Agencies in Medicare As Vance Blocks $1.4 Billion in Funding

May 13, 2026

Hermon Burglary Leads to Two Arrests And Drug Seizure

May 13, 2026

Game Warden Killed in Avon Plane Crash

May 13, 2026
0 0 votes
Article Rating
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gardiner Schneider
Gardiner Schneider
2 years ago

Chick-Fil-A is a clean place to eat with nice employees, nice customers and good food. It was probably a lot more economical for them to settle this ginned up law suit than to fight it, and the negative press that the leftist news media would roll out.

0
ME Infidel
ME Infidel
2 years ago

I paid $15. for a take home sandwich just last night at a local pizza joint. It was mediocre at best. My decision is to not go there again….the old “vote with your feet” reaction. Only grifters would think to sue Chick-fil-A and only a dirtbag attorney would represent them.

0
Recent News

U.S. Stops Enrolling New Hospices and Home Healthcare Agencies in Medicare As Vance Blocks $1.4 Billion in Funding

May 13, 2026

Hermon Burglary Leads to Two Arrests And Drug Seizure

May 13, 2026

Game Warden Killed in Avon Plane Crash

May 13, 2026

Lead Maine Hosts Ranked-Choice Voting Forum Ahead of Crowded 2026 Republican Gubernatorial Primary

May 13, 2026

Contentious Hearing Over Maine Girl Dads Ballot Initiative Puts Bellows’ Role Under Scrutiny

May 13, 2026
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

wpDiscuz