Google Parent Loses $90 Billion in Market Value Following Catastrophic Woke A.I.

Google’s parent company, Alphabet, lost roughly $90 billion in market value on Monday after the disastrous launch of its “Gemini” chatbot, which was described as an “Artificial Intelligence” or AI.

[RELATED: Google Suspends Ultra Woke AI Image Maker “Gemini” After Widespread Mockery…]

Rather than anything approaching an AI, Gemini was instead a comically bizarre generator of left-wing fake history, blatantly biased information, and a shockingly poor example of computer programming from one of the world’s leading tech companies.

Early users of the Google chatbot quickly posted examples of the absurd outputs that generated widespread ridicule on social media.

Forbes reported that Alphabet’s shares fell by 4.5 percent on Monday, after Google halted its AI’s image generation service.

Shares dropped to $138.75, as Google said it was working to remove the “historical inaccuracies” in their program’s image generation feature.

Those inaccuracies included recasting white historical figures — like Catholic Popes, Nazi soldiers, Vikings, and the American Founding Fathers — as African and Asian.

The company did not apologize for its anti-white racial bias, and doubled down on its commitment to Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI) principles, even as the company received criticism for its AI and hemorrhaged value.

Google was mocked by numerous conservatives on social media, and was criticized as “racist” by Tesla and SpaceX founder Elon Musk.

The program explicitly refused to generate images of white men when asked, and avoided generating white men in almost all cases.

Although the AI’s image generation is paused, the program continues to display strong left-wing bias in its answers to numerous questions.

In many instances, Gemini was unable to assert with certainty whether popular conservative media figures were better or worse than Adolf Hitler or Joseph Stalin.

The rollout of Gemini brought Google’s far-left agenda to the forefront of public attention, leading to negative posts about the program trending on X, and highlighting questions about the company’s reliability, thus harming its market value.