The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • DAILY CALLER EXCLUSIVE: Lawmakers From Nearly Every State Call On Congress To Turn Off Federal Money Tap For Planned Parenthood
  • Blaming School Shootings On Guns Didn’t Stick So Now the Scapegoat Is Declining Maine Icon Stephen King
  • GOP Submits Constitutional Amendment Requiring Mainers to Approve Any Tax Hikes or Spending Increases
  • Labor Committee Split on Whether to Eliminate the Cost-of-Living Adjustment for Maine’s Minimum Wage
  • Maine Agency Quickly Scrubs Discriminatory Hiring Quotas After Trump Admin Threat
  • Attorneys General of 15 States Back Rep. Libby in Amicus Brief, While AG Frey Urges SCOTUS to Deny Her Appeal
  • Trump Admin Freezes Maine Wildlife Agency’s Funds Over ‘Sex-Based’ Hiring Policy
  • Committee Rejects Three Proposals to Regulate Marijuana Industry, But One Targeting Organized Crime Remains on the Table
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Monday, May 12
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Commentary » Brunswick’s “Wilbur’s Woods” House Project Will Be a Blight: Schaeffer
Commentary

Brunswick’s “Wilbur’s Woods” House Project Will Be a Blight: Schaeffer

Pem SchaefferBy Pem SchaefferJune 5, 2024Updated:June 5, 20242 Comments4 Mins Read2K Views
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

After much middle of the night reflection, I have reached at least two conclusions:

First, Wilbur’s Woods needs to be renamed “Bottleneck Woods,” because that is how it is best described.

Second, the Project needs to go to “ALL STOP” condition because as proposed it is completely unworkable, and will be a blight upon the neighborhood and Brunswick itself for having approved such an insult to residential life.

The following considerations force me to reach this conclusion:

After reading the original Fast Track approval process with attendant discussion, it is obvious that Deputy Chief Emerson of the Fire Department has unresolved concerns about the overall subject of emergency services access to all residences in the Project.

66 bedrooms, where each could accommodate two persons, means 132 persons could desire to take up residence on the 4.87 acres of the project. Some could be children, of course, but the nature of the design argues against that; it is simply not a child friendly layout and design, and children would be put in danger because of the lack of outside play space and the exceptionally cramped parking accommodations.

132 persons over 4.87 acres works out to 27 persons per acre, not allowing for landscaped places, parking, etc. That is simply an unreasonable, unworkable load in a confined space like Bottleneck Woods.

Parking is allocated at one space per bedroom, means it will accommodate one adult per bedroom with a vehicle of their own. When we got married, we lived in a one bedroom apartment for 5 years before we bought our own house. We each had jobs, and we each had a car. If couples are not the case, it is reasonable to expect that roommates could share premises, two to a bedroom (twin beds).

Any way you look at it, 66 parking spaces for what will likely be well over 100 driving age adults is completely impractical and unworkable. There is no overflow parking, and no on-street parking either. If you can’t park on project premises, you are SOL, as the old saying goes.

The 66 parking spaces will of necessity have to be assigned and so marked clearly as to which residence they belong, not only because of space limitations, but because the MSHA regulations will require wiring stubs be installed to accommodate EV charging stations at each space, and they will be connected to the electrical feed for each individual unit. The possibility that someone other than the resident of a given unit could charge their car in the wrong assigned space is a recipe for some serious arguments, if not fights.

What is going to happen if you come home from work, at any time of day or night, depending on your shift, and you find that someone has parked in your spot, and you have absolutely nowhere to park. Do you park on a lawn or landscaped area? Do you park behind the offender to block them in, thereby blocking traffic flow, and likely blocking three parking spots. This is especially problematic in the parking area for the 18 apartments, since they are tucked tight to the entry road that gives the project the name Bottleneck Woods.

We’ve all had experiences in parking lots where sloppy parkers on either side of an “empty space” do a poor job centering their car in their space, and make the empty space so narrow as to be unusable because if you can even fit your car in, you can’t open your doors. What happens next in this scenario? How much reckless “park anywhere you can” behavior will become the norm, making things miserable for everyone, and dangerous as well when it comes to emergency access for Fire Engines, EMT’s, and/or Police.

The circumstances just described are dangerous, unworkable, and reflect incompetence and lack of foresight on the part of the Developers and the Brunswick Planning Department and its associated citizen boards.

Accordingly, the Planned Approval of the project should go to ALL STOP immediately!

Previous ArticleMainers Squeezed Out of Homes by State Migration Policies 
Next Article Drag Queen “Letta Dicken” Braves Unsubstantiated Dangers to Perform for Children at Maine LGBT Event
Pem Schaeffer

Pem Schaeffer is a retired engineer who progressed to a position in business development leadership in defense electronics. He lives and writes in Brunswick, Maine, and blogs at: http://othersideofbrunswick.blogspot.com/ He can be reached at pemster4062@yahoo.com or you can always buy him lunch at a Maine Policy Institute luncheon. He's easy that way, and he'll still respect you if you do.

Related Posts

Blaming School Shootings On Guns Didn’t Stick So Now the Scapegoat Is Declining Maine Icon Stephen King

May 12, 2025

Chaos & Crowns: Are Pageants Still Relevant?

May 9, 2025

Now Too Infirm to Think Straight, Biden Still Believes He’s Cicero – and the Portland Press Herald Thinks Chuck Grassley is the Problem

May 8, 2025
Recent News

DAILY CALLER EXCLUSIVE: Lawmakers From Nearly Every State Call On Congress To Turn Off Federal Money Tap For Planned Parenthood

May 12, 2025

GOP Submits Constitutional Amendment Requiring Mainers to Approve Any Tax Hikes or Spending Increases

May 12, 2025

Labor Committee Split on Whether to Eliminate the Cost-of-Living Adjustment for Maine’s Minimum Wage

May 12, 2025

Attorneys General of 15 States Back Rep. Libby in Amicus Brief, While AG Frey Urges SCOTUS to Deny Her Appeal

May 10, 2025

Trump Admin Freezes Maine Wildlife Agency’s Funds Over ‘Sex-Based’ Hiring Policy

May 9, 2025
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.