U.S. Rep. Chellie Pingree (D) has co-sponsored a bill introducing a Constitutional amendment that would reverse the Supreme Court’s recent decision regarding presidential immunity.
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 opinion that presidents are entitled to complete immunity from criminal prosecution for any exercise of their “core constitutional powers” and presumptive immunity for any remaining official actions.
The Justices also declared, however, that presidents do not enjoy immunity for “unofficial acts.”
Dissenting were Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. In addition to joining the opinion authored by Justice Sotomayor, Justice Jackson also filed a dissenting opinion of her own.
These dissenting Justices argued that the Court was wrong to grant any degree of presidential immunity, suggesting that it imprudently places the President above the rule of law.
The Constitutional amendment proposed by Rep. Pingree and thirty-nine of her Democratic colleagues seeks to reverse this ruling by declaring that no “officer of the United States” — including the president — is immune from criminal prosecution for violating otherwise valid laws.
The president would also be explicitly precluded from granting “himself or herself” a reprieve or pardon.
It is also specified in the proposed text that the amendment would be self-executing, meaning that Congress would not need to take any action for these provisions to go into effect. Lawmakers would, however, be given the power to enact legislation to “facilitate the implementation of this amendment.”
Click Here to Read the Full Text of the Legislation
“Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court undermined the foundation of our Constitution that no man is above the law,” Pingree said.
“As Justice Sotomayor laid out in her powerful dissenting opinion, this decision could have severe long-term consequences and upsets the principles that have existed since our nation’s founding,” she continued.
“This constitutional amendment not only corrects an error of this Supreme Court and protects our democracy, but ensures our nation endures for years to come,” Pingree concluded.
Click Here to Read Rep. Pingree’s Full Press Release
These remarks largely echo those which Pingree issued on X immediately following the Court’s decision in early July.
Pingree posted a lengthy statement to the social media platform in which she explained her strong opposition to the Court’s decision, accusing the Justices of “undermin[ing] the foundation of our Constitution.”
“Public trust in the Supreme Court is already at a historic low, and this term has cemented the current Court’s place as one of the most partisan and extreme benches we’ve ever seen,” Pingree said.
“This is the Supreme Court that overturned 50 years of precedent protecting reproductive rights, struck down affirmative action, and stripped significant rulemaking authority from federal agencies to further empower the Judicial Branch,” she continued.
“Now,” Pingree said, “by expanding a President’s immunity from prosecution for so-called ‘official acts’, the Court has undermined the foundation of our Constitution that no man is above the law.”
“As Justice Sotomayor lays out in her powerful dissenting opinion, this decision will have severe long-term consequences and upsets the principles that have existed since our nation’s founding,” she continued.
“Mr. Trump’s desperate attempt to cling to power fueled a violent insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021,” said Pingree. “SCOTUS’s decision today not only opens the door to absolving this treasonous act but gives any future president seemingly unchecked freedom to commit crimes at will for political gain.”
“It’s a sad day for America,” Pingree concluded. “It’s a sad day for democracy.”
[RELATED: Maine’s Congressional Delegation Splits Over SCOTUS Presidential Immunity Ruling]
U.S. Sen. Angus King (I) joined Pingree in her criticism, accusing the ruling of giving future leaders “unchecked” authority and putting presidents “above the law.”
U.S. Sen. Susan Collins (R) and U.S. Rep. Jared Golden (D) took a more restrained approach in responding to the Supreme Court’s decision at the time.
While Sen. Collins simply stated that that the Justices differentiated between official and unofficial conduct and that it will now be up to the lower courts to engage in “further fact finding,” Rep. Golden explained that he wanted to wait and see how the decision is applied by the lower courts before “rushing to judgement.”
The United States Congress has not yet taken any further action on the resolution introduced this past Wednesday by Pingree and other Democratic lawmakers.
Click Here for More Information on H.J. Res. 193
Pure gas lighting
The loser from Maine finally surfaces but for the wrong reason.
She needs to go and take the Beef with her along with Mills and Bellows. Collins can go along to because RINOS are not welcome in Maine. Had enough of the Shenanigans and the Mills family picked up right where the Baldaccis left off. Nepotism has no place in Maines GVT. So stop making illegal money on Triad weed properties Mills.
Jesus pinhead, a little preparation-h would go a long way on those facial fissures.
What a total waste of a human being she is, right along with Golden, Collins, King and the entire Maine legislature. None of them give a damn about any of us, it’s all about them and their insatiable need for power and money. Maine is going to be the East coast California in no time.
Just the standard democrat idiot again. It takes a long time and huge votes, particularly by all the states that must ratify it to amend the Constitution. The dems are just PO’ed that that SCOTUS decision brought an end to a lot of the political persecution of Trump much to their dismay. So like mad little children they strike back in a childish way. This has got absolutely NO chance of passing and makes Chellie look like the good leftie idiot she is.
Because she doesn’t like a past President she wants to eliminate immunity for all Presidents? How juvenile, she needs to be voted out.
What is wrong with these people , I mean really!??? Do they think they will be immune to the authoritarian, communist rule their pushing for !?? Really , do they??? Gees, their jut being useless idiots that will be kicked to the curb like everyone else if their communist agenda actually happens, GOD HELP US ALL. The stupidity of these SO CALLED educated people astounds me. How did these people ever get in govt. Wow! 🥴🫣
This would require a two third major vote in Both houses to pass. Our entire delegation are preschoolers with heavy diapers. Collins is a disgrace to the Republican name.
It will help Joe
Ms Pingree knows more than the Supreme Court .
She is a genuine POS who needs to be voted out in November .
Save Maine ….Pingree must go .
Evidently Article II of the Constitution, which addresses Presidential immunity and restricts it to official acts, doesn’t make these “brains” happy. And if Pingree and her cohorts succeed in eliminating such immunity, who in their right mind will agree to become President and make the critical decisions necessary to lead the nation if they are subjected to the “gotcha” suits like those the Democrats have thrown at President Trump? Oh, yeah . . . Democrats . . . because, ironically, Democrats are the ones who appear to believe that THEY determine what the law is when they ignore the Supreme Court, for example, college loans. So are those sponsoring this bill thinking that Democrats should have permanent power in this country? VOTE PINGREE OUT IN NOVEMBER – SAVE AMERICAN VALUES!!