The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Investigations
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Supreme Court Rules 8-1 to Strike Down Colorado’s Ban on LGBTQ Conversion Therapy for Minors
  • Alleged Alcohol-Related Crash Leaves Bucksport Man Dead
  • Portland MDEA Bust Leads to Arrest of New York Man with a Pound of Cocaine and Nearly $40k in Cash
  • Westbrook Man Arrested on Child Porn Charges Following Months-Long Investigation
  • Scumbag Steals from Make-a-Wish Donation Jar in Clinton
  • Motorcyclist Killed in Three Vehicle Crash in Raymond
  • Mainers Bear Nation’s 5th Highest Tax Burden
  • Lewiston City Council to Decide Future of Colisée With Proposed $250,000 Loan Vote
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Wednesday, April 1
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Investigations
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
The Maine Wire
Home » News » News » Jack Smith to Appeal Dismissal of Classified Documents Case Against Donald Trump
News

Jack Smith to Appeal Dismissal of Classified Documents Case Against Donald Trump

Libby PalanzaBy Libby PalanzaJuly 16, 2024Updated:July 16, 20245 Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Special Counsel Jack Smith is now poised to appeal a federal judge’s dismissal of the case against former President Donald Trump (R) for allegedly storing and mishandling classified documents at Mar-a-Lago in Florida.

In a statement released Monday, a spokesperson for Special Counsel Smith explained that the Justice Department has now authorized Smith to appeal this decision.

“The dismissal of the case deviates from the uniform conclusion of all previous courts to have considered the issue that the Attorney General is statutorily authorized to appoint a Special Counsel,” said spokesman Peter Carr. “The Justice Department has authorized the Special Counsel to appeal the court’s order.”

Smith’s appeal will be heard by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals out of Atlanta, although the case may ultimately make its way to the Supreme Court.

In the ruling released Monday, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon asserted that Smith’s appointment violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution.

[RELATED: Classified Documents Case Against Donald Trump Dismissed by Federal Judge in Florida]

Judge Cannon argued that the Appointments Clause serves as an important tool for maintaining the separation of powers and the process by which the Special Counsel was appointed usurps this division of authority.

She goes on to explain that federal law, as currently written, does not authorize the Attorney General to grant someone the broad powers entrusted to Special Counsel Smith.

In other words, she found that there was no constitutional authority Smith’s office to exist, let alone to bring charges against former President Trump.

Smith was appointed in late-2022 by Attorney General Merrick Garland from “outside the United States Government” to serve as Special Counsel. Consequently, he “was not nominated by the President or confirmed by the Senate.”

Contrary to the arguments advanced by Cannon, other courts have affirmed the Attorney General’s authority to appoint special counsels.

Cannon’s ruling comes two days after the former president was the target of an attempted assassination that left one rally attendee dead and two other injured.

[RELATED: TRUMP ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT — Bloody Don Fist Bumps After Shooter Fires at PA Rally]

President Joe Biden (D) reacted to Cannon’s ruling in an interview with NBC News’ Lester Holt.

“I’m not surprised,” said President Biden. “It comes from the immunity decision the Supreme Court ruled on. Clarence Thomas, his dissent said that independent prosecutors appointed by the attorney general aren’t legit. That’s the basis of what this judge moved to dismiss.”

The opinion authored by Justice Clarence Thomas referenced by Biden in this statement was a concurring, not dissenting, opinion from the presidential immunity decision released earlier this month.

If convicted of the charges in the case appealed by Smith, the former president faces up a maximum prison sentence of at least 100 years and millions of dollars in fines. Trump has plead not guilty on all counts.

In TruthSocial post Monday, the former president reacted to the dismissal, arguing that Cannon’s ruling ought to be a “first step” and advocated for all other cases against him to be dismissed as well, referring to them as “Witch Hunts.”

“The Democrat Justice Department coordinated ALL of these Political Attacks, which are an Election Interference conspiracy against Joe Biden’s Political Opponent, ME,” he wrote. “Let us come together to END all Weaponization of our Justice System, and Make America Great Again!”

Cannon was appointed by Trump and confirmed by the Senate in November of 2020.

Previous ArticleFormer Trump CDC Director Accuses Biden’s FDA of Deliberately Lying about mRNA Vaccine Side Effects
Next Article Microsoft Lays Off DEI Team While Continuing to Promote the Far-Left Program on its Website
Libby Palanza

Libby Palanza is a reporter for the Maine Wire and a lifelong Mainer. She graduated from Harvard University with a degree in Government and History. She can be reached at [email protected].

Latest News

Supreme Court Rules 8-1 to Strike Down Colorado’s Ban on LGBTQ Conversion Therapy for Minors

March 31, 2026

Alleged Alcohol-Related Crash Leaves Bucksport Man Dead

March 31, 2026

Portland MDEA Bust Leads to Arrest of New York Man with a Pound of Cocaine and Nearly $40k in Cash

March 31, 2026
0 0 votes
Article Rating
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mark violette
mark violette
1 year ago

Supreme Court ruled on this, special counsil powers have to be voted on by and given by congress. not much of a lawyer

4
Chris
Chris
1 year ago

Jack Smith-Hater!!!

1
T C
T C
1 year ago

Can Smith not be arrested for impersonating a federal Official? How about charges for wasting government resources? Trump should sue the guy personally to recover legal costs from this bogus prosecution.

3
Waldo Otto
Waldo Otto
1 year ago

Dems are so used to getting away with cheating, they dont even bother to follow the law.

0
Judge Smells
Judge Smells
1 year ago

Rotsa Ruck Jack

0
Recent News

Supreme Court Rules 8-1 to Strike Down Colorado’s Ban on LGBTQ Conversion Therapy for Minors

March 31, 2026

Alleged Alcohol-Related Crash Leaves Bucksport Man Dead

March 31, 2026

Portland MDEA Bust Leads to Arrest of New York Man with a Pound of Cocaine and Nearly $40k in Cash

March 31, 2026

Westbrook Man Arrested on Child Porn Charges Following Months-Long Investigation

March 31, 2026

Scumbag Steals from Make-a-Wish Donation Jar in Clinton

March 31, 2026
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

wpDiscuz