The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • State Regulators Approve Merger of York Hospital with MaineHealth
  • Somali TPS Ends After 35 Years: What Does It Mean for Lewiston and Portland?
  • Betting Market Taking Odds On Graham Platner Possible Criminal Charges, Divorce
  • Drought Tightens Grip on Maine as Wells Drop, Water Restrictions Begin
  • ICE Steps Up Presence at Portland Jetport as Agency Prepares to Equip Agents With Electric Shock Gloves
  • U.S. Chamber of Commerce Endorses Paul LePage in Maine’s 2nd Congressional District Race
  • Kentucky Woman Faces Two Federal Felonies After WWII Memorial Vandalized in Washington
  • Editorial: We Can Talk to Anyone — So Why Can’t We Talk to Each Other?
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube
The Maine Wire
Sunday, August 16
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
  • Support the Maine Wire
  • Store
The Maine Wire
Home » News » News » Google’s Exclusive Contracts to Serve as Default Search Engine on Devices and Web Browsers Ruled Anti-Competitive by Federal Judge
News

Google’s Exclusive Contracts to Serve as Default Search Engine on Devices and Web Browsers Ruled Anti-Competitive by Federal Judge

Libby PalanzaBy Libby PalanzaAugust 7, 2024Updated:August 7, 20242 Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

A federal judge ruled Monday that Google has illegally maintained a monopoly over the search engine industry through anti-competitive business practices.

Judge Amit P. Mehta of U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a nearly 300-page ruling Monday that struck down the tech giant’s exclusive contracts with web browsers and device manufacturers that allow it to serve as users’ default search engine as a violation of anti-trust laws.

“Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,” wrote Judge Mehta.

This ruling reportedly marks the DOJ’s first legal victory against a monopoly power in more than twenty years.

“Google, of course, recognizes that losing defaults would dramatically impact its bottom
line,” Mehta explained. “The defaults are more than just ‘incremental promotion.’ They supply Google with unequalled query volume that is effectively unavailable to rivals.”

“Even if a new entrant were positioned from a quality standpoint to bid for the default when an agreement expires, such a firm could compete only if it were prepared to pay partners upwards of billions of dollars in revenue share and make them whole for any revenue shortfalls resulting from the change,” wrote Mehta. “No current search engine in the market can compete on those terms. It is even harder to envision a new entrant doing so.”

It is expected that this ruling will ultimately trigger a separate set of proceedings to determine what penalties the tech giant may eventually face.

Click Here to Read Judge Mehta’s Full Ruling

“This victory against Google is an historic win for the American people,” said Attorney General Merrick Garland. “No company — no matter how large or influential — is above the law. The Justice Department will continue to vigorously enforce our antitrust laws.”

“This landmark decision holds Google accountable. It paves the path for innovation for generations to come and protects access to information for all Americans,” said Assistant Attorney General Kanter. “This victory is a reflection on the tireless efforts of the dedicated public servants at the Antitrust Division and our state law enforcement partners whose work made today’s decision possible.”

Click Here to Read the Full Press Release from the Attorney General’s Office

“This decision recognizes that Google offers the best search engine, but concludes that we shouldn’t be allowed to make it easily available,” Google President of Global Affairs Kent Walker said in a statement posted to X.

“We appreciate the Court’s finding that Google is ‘the industry’s highest quality search engine, which has earned Google the trust of hundreds of millions of daily users’, that Google ‘has long been the best search engine, particularly on mobile devices’, ‘has continued to innovate in search’ and that ‘Apple and Mozilla occasionally assess Google’s search quality relative to its rivals and find Google’s to be superior,’” he continued.

Walker went on to confirm that Google plans to appeal the court’s ruling in this case.

“Given this, and that people are increasingly looking for information in more and more ways, we plan to appeal,” Walker concluded. “As this process continues, we will remain focused on making products that people find helpful and easy to use.” 

[RELATED: Google At The Center of Biggest Anti-Trust Lawsuit in More Than 20 Years, Trial Set To Begin This Week]

Last September, Google reached a $700 million settlement in an anti-trust lawsuit filed by a number of state attorneys general, including Maine’s Aaron Frey, over the company’s policies surrounding the Google Play Store.

The $700 million settlement consists of $630 million in restitution payments to customers who were impacted by the practices under scrutiny in the lawsuit. An additional $70 million in penalties will be paid to the states.

[RELATED: $700 Million Settlement Reached with Google in Anti-Trust Lawsuit Filed by State Attorneys General]

Behind this lawsuit were accusations that Google, among other things, entered into exclusive contracts with the manufacturers of Android devices to ensure that the Google Play Store was the only app store installed on these devices by default.

Google was also accused of buying off other app store developers to prevent competition from emerging and “erecting technological hurdles” to discourage users from sideloading apps and alternative app stores.

This settlement was finalized and executed in full on November 17, 2023.

In recent years, the DOJ has also filed anti-trust lawsuit against a number of other major corporations, including Meta, Amazon, and Apple.

Previous ArticlePortland Police Continue Investigation Into Fatal Forest Ave Shooting, No Arrests Made
Next Article Mills Heaps Praise On Kamala’s Radical-Left VP Pick
Libby Palanza

Libby Palanza is a reporter for the Maine Wire, frequently covering legislative, legal, and local stories. She can be reached at [email protected].

Latest News

State Regulators Approve Merger of York Hospital with MaineHealth

August 15, 2026

Somali TPS Ends After 35 Years: What Does It Mean for Lewiston and Portland?

August 15, 2026

Betting Market Taking Odds On Graham Platner Possible Criminal Charges, Divorce

August 15, 2026
0 0 votes
Article Rating
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
R.Champ
R.Champ
2 years ago

This is good as Google manipulates what people are more than likely to view when they browse a topic. Very lefty driven.

0
Chris
Chris
2 years ago

Thank you judge!!!

0
Recent News

State Regulators Approve Merger of York Hospital with MaineHealth

August 15, 2026

Somali TPS Ends After 35 Years: What Does It Mean for Lewiston and Portland?

August 15, 2026

Betting Market Taking Odds On Graham Platner Possible Criminal Charges, Divorce

August 15, 2026

Drought Tightens Grip on Maine as Wells Drop, Water Restrictions Begin

August 15, 2026

ICE Steps Up Presence at Portland Jetport as Agency Prepares to Equip Agents With Electric Shock Gloves

August 15, 2026
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

wpDiscuz