The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
  • Support the Maine Wire
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • JD Vance, Pete Buttigieg Continue to Hold Early Leads for 2028 New Hampshire Presidential Primaries: Pine Tree State Poll
  • Jones Campaign: Lewiston Shooting Funds Sent to Well-Funded Immigrant Nonprofits Instead of Victims
  • Veteran Bangor Cop, Fighting Crime Nearly 50 Years, Gets Special Award For Helping Victims
  • Fund Created To Benefit Families Of Maine Sailor, Other Six Victims Of Sunken Fishing Boat
  • New Executive Order Aims to Preserve Herbicide Identified as Serious Health Risk by RFK
  • Maine’s Largest Daily’s Recap Of Jesse Jackson’s Visits Completely Missed His Historic Paper Mill Strike Speech
  • MaineCare Fraud Risk Map: Explore New Data on Medicaid Claims for Maine Providers
  • Sanford Data Center Plan Draws Concerns Despite Self-Generated Power Proposal
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Thursday, February 19
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
  • Support the Maine Wire
The Maine Wire
Home » News » News » DOT Rejects Maine’s Request for $456 Million to Construct Offshore Wind Port at Sears Island
News

DOT Rejects Maine’s Request for $456 Million to Construct Offshore Wind Port at Sears Island

Libby PalanzaBy Libby PalanzaOctober 22, 2024Updated:October 29, 20247 Comments5 Mins Read1K Views
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Federal officials have rejected Maine’s application for $456 million to construct an offshore wind port at Sears Island.

According to reporting from the Portland Press Herald, Paige Sterling — a media advisor at the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) — said in an email that the agency does not comment on applications, “but noting that, as with last year’s awards, these programs were significantly oversubscribed.”

Sterling went on to explain that the DOT received around two hundred applications seeking an aggregate of more than $27 billion, “far exceeding the amount of funding available.”

According to a DOT press release, the agency selected 44 projects to receive a combined $4.2 billion in funding, including those which “improve safety, mobility, and economic competitiveness, constructing major bridges, expanding port capacity, redesigning interchanges, and more.”

In February of this year, Gov. Janet Mills (D-Maine) announced that she had selected Sears Island for a 100-acre development to become the site of a new port, dedicated to the construction and implementation of an offshore wind turbine project.

If successfully constructed, the facility would support “floating offshore wind fabrication, staging, assembly, maintenance, and deployment,” according to a February press release from the governor’s office.

“With deepwater access to the port development site, Maine has the potential to establish a premier location for the industry and help meet growing demand in the U.S. for offshore wind port infrastructure,” the governor wrote.

[RELATED: Mills Designates the Pristine Sears Island to be Developed For Offshore Wind]

Currently, the state owns 340 acres of the nearly 1,000-acre island, while the rest is dedicated as conservation land.

The state had previously been considering two possible locations for the project, Sears Island and Mack Point. In the end, the governor opted for Sears Island, citing that the state already owned the land and that the project would likely result in a smaller adverse environmental effect at that location.

Several months after this, the State announced that it would be submitting an application to the federal government for $456 million worth of funding to advance the development of this project.

[RELATED: Maine Seeks Federal Funding to Develop Historic Untouched Sears Island For Green Energy]

“We knew the grant program would be extremely competitive and that our application was ambitious,” Commissioner Bruce Van Note said in a statement emailed to the Portland Press Herald Tuesday.

“We believe the result is a reflection of the fiercely competitive nature of this program and that it does not reflect, or undermine, the widely recognized need for this port, the strong merit of Maine’s plan, or the vast economic and environmental benefits associated with port development,” Commissioner Van Note stated.

According to the Bangor Daily News, the Commissioner explained that while this rejection represents a notable setback for the project — which is hoped to be completed by 2029 — the State is still seeking $130 million from a separate federal program.

“Today’s news has not changed the fact that we need a port to create good, union jobs, power our economy with affordable, clean, homegrown energy and protect our coasts and communities from the worst impacts of climate change,” said Jack Shapiro, the Natural Resources Council of Maine’s (NRCM) Climate and Clean Energy Director, according to the outlet.

Searsport Town Manager James Gillway told the Bangor newspaper that he remains “confident that this project will create good paying local jobs, lower taxes for our residents and will attract families to help put kids in our schools.”

Rolf Olsen — Vice President of the Board of Friends of Sears Island, which manages a portion of the island set aside for conservation — has spoken out against the State’s decision to pursue Sears Island as the site for this project.

In a statement to the Press Herald, Olsen said that the federal government’s decision “would appear to be a significant financial blow” to develop the facility.

“We’re somewhat encouraged that the state’s port development grant application was turned down, especially since it only considered developing Sears Island and not Mack Point,” Olsen said.

This proposed project has previously drawn criticism more broadly for concerns that the pursuit of wind power may ultimately do more harm than good for the environment.

“My concern is only that in trying to affect climate change, that we’re going to cause more damage to the environment than climate change is already causing,” reportedly said New England Fishermen’s Stewardship Association (NEFSA) Chief Operating Officer Dustin Delano, a commercial fisherman from Friendship.

The Mills Administration has placed a great emphasis on pursuing the development of offshore wind during her administration, including with the Maine Offshore Wind Initiative that was first launched in 2019.

The State has suggested that the Gulf of Maine is “one of our state’s largest untapped clean energy resources,” and that “offshore wind can lead to economic growth and provide clean energy that combats climate change and reduces our dependence on fossil fuels.”

Note: This story was updated to reflect that the United States DOT awarded a combined $4.2 billion in funding. The original version of this story indicated that the agency had awarded a combined $4.2 million.

Previous ArticleNational Abortion Data Shows a Dramatic Increase in Monthly Abortions Nationwide Since 2023, Fueled by Mailed Abortion Pills
Next Article Portland City Council Rejects Reform to Syringe Exchange, Votes for Needle ‘buyback’ Program Instead
Libby Palanza

Libby Palanza is a reporter for the Maine Wire and a lifelong Mainer. She graduated from Harvard University with a degree in Government and History. She can be reached at [email protected].

Subscribe to Substack

Related Posts

JD Vance, Pete Buttigieg Continue to Hold Early Leads for 2028 New Hampshire Presidential Primaries: Pine Tree State Poll

February 19, 2026

Veteran Bangor Cop, Fighting Crime Nearly 50 Years, Gets Special Award For Helping Victims

February 19, 2026

Fund Created To Benefit Families Of Maine Sailor, Other Six Victims Of Sunken Fishing Boat

February 19, 2026

<span class="dsq-postid" data-dsqidentifier="31957 https://www.themainewire.com/?p=31957">7 Comments

  1. Rooster on October 22, 2024 3:32 PM

    Destroying nature to save it…

  2. Larry Steve on October 22, 2024 4:32 PM

    They rejected it . GOOD .

  3. Louis Louis on October 22, 2024 7:36 PM

    Maybe the iron / air space age battery farm we heard all about will be next big deal boondoggle on the chopping block .
    The university’s floating wind mills got nixed , many towns are gradually clamping down on the solar fields , people are learning that these green new deal schemes aren’t what they are advertised to be . Maine is too far north for a heat pump . I guess Augusta wants to be on the cutting edge of new technology that will likely be obsolete in ten years anyway and then where will we be .,
    We just have to sweep the house clean in November .

  4. ME Infidel on October 22, 2024 8:33 PM

    Matt Jacobson, Marketing Director for Summit Natural Gas of ME, was on Ray Richardson’s radio show this morning on WLOB. He explained that in order to get to the 2030/2050 Net Zero goals Mills wants, the state of Maine would need to take up 5,400 sq. mi. (that’s 1,000 sq. mi. larger than the state of CT) off the Maine coast for a windmill farm. Plus, that electricity is also unreliable and intermittent.

    These are the climate ideologues the useful idiots in Maine have elected. Keep it up and we’ll destroy the state and the country completely.

  5. Jake on October 23, 2024 6:18 AM

    So, I just read about the real cause of Crimate Trains as Biden calls it—The sun has been causing the devices used to measure the temperatures to darken over time. As these darken more heat is absorbed and the devices read a higher temperature, causing “climate change”. Also many of these measuring devices are in or very near high population areas(cities), meaning more heat absorbing materials causing higher readings – NOT so much to do with burning petroleum!

  6. patriot1 on October 23, 2024 6:40 AM

    these people are nuts, shove those windmills where the son dont shine !

  7. Minnehonk on October 24, 2024 11:40 AM

    Mills and the other Democrats push Green energy policies following the orders from the Green Energy lobbyist making millions off of the backs of hard working Mainers who just experience higher bills for unreliable, expensive sources of energy. If you vote Democrat, don’t complain about your electric bills increasing

Leave A Reply

Subscribe to Substack
Recent News

JD Vance, Pete Buttigieg Continue to Hold Early Leads for 2028 New Hampshire Presidential Primaries: Pine Tree State Poll

February 19, 2026

Fund Created To Benefit Families Of Maine Sailor, Other Six Victims Of Sunken Fishing Boat

February 19, 2026

New Executive Order Aims to Preserve Herbicide Identified as Serious Health Risk by RFK

February 19, 2026

MaineCare Fraud Risk Map: Explore New Data on Medicaid Claims for Maine Providers

February 19, 2026

CMP Signals New Rate Increase Filing, Formal Proposal Expected in April

February 19, 2026
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.