Lawmakers have rejected two bills introduced with the intention of expanding employment opportunities for young Mainers.
While LD 618 would have allowed those under the age of 16 to work later hours, LD 644 sought to eliminate a number of regulations governing when and for how long minors are allowed to work.
In testimony introducing her bill, Rep. Alicia Collins (R-Sidney) suggested that perhaps “we can’t seem to keep young people engaged in the work force” because they “haven’t been exposed to work.”
“This bill isn’t proposing we put 12- and 13-year-olds back to work in the mines,” Rep. Collins said. “It is simply a way to bring 16- and 17-year-olds back into the work force.”
Support for this proposal was also expressed by the Maine State Chamber of Commerce.
“By eliminating constraints on weekly hours and specific time restrictions, this bill empowers older students to gain valuable work experience, contribute to the economy, and support their financial needs,” said the Chamber. “Importantly, this measure aligns with workforce demands while ensuring that minors continue to operate within safe and structured employment environments.”
Testifying in opposition were representatives of the Maine Education Association (MEA) and the Maine AFL-CIO, citing concerns over the removal of these existing “guardrails,” as this would “erode the proper balance between work, education, and ‘being a kid.'”
Similar issues were also raised by these organizations with respect to LD 618.
Testifying in support of extending the allowable working hours for those under the age of 16 were representatives of the Maine Retail Association and Hospitality Maine, among others.
“This legislation offers a valuable opportunity to empower young people with work experience, financial independence, and a stronger connection to their communities, while supporting businesses and the economy,” said Rep. David Boyer (R-Poland), the bill’s sponsor.
Lawmakers on the Legislature’s Labor Committee were divided along partisan lines over these proposals, with all Republican members supporting them and all Democratic members opposing them.
This same trend materialized on the chamber floor in both the House and the Senate with only a few exceptions.
Consequently, both these bills have now been placed in the legislative files and will not be considered any further this session.
