PORTLAND — Portland Public Schools Board Chair Sara Lentz used the Tuesday, Jan. 13, 2026, school board meeting to declare that the district “will not support ICE” and that “ICE is not welcome here,” claiming the mere fear of immigration enforcement activity is already showing up in classrooms through lower student attendance.
In remarks delivered during the meeting, Lentz said the district has “already” seen attendance drop when families receive information about increased enforcement activity. She said Portland Public Schools takes such reports “very seriously,” investigates what it is hearing, and works with community partners.
Lentz also said she “grieve[s] deeply” the death of Renée Nicole Good, a Minneapolis woman killed during a federal operation earlier this month and said the district would honor her life.
The comments landed in a city that already has a formal policy limiting how city officials engage on immigration status.
Portland’s municipal code states that, unless required by law or a court order, city police officers and employees may not inquire into a person’s immigration status or take actions for the purpose of determining it. The ordinance includes a narrow exemption that allows inquiry where an officer or employee has reasonable suspicion a person was previously deported, is again present in the U.S., and is committing or has committed certain felony-level crimes. The code also states that required cooperation is not prohibited, language that underscores the legal reality that federal authorities can still operate in the city.
In 2025, the Portland City Council unanimously approved a separate resolution condemning federal immigration enforcement tactics such as unmarked vehicles and masked or unidentifiable agents, particularly around schools and other public institutions, and called for clearer identification standards.
But Lentz’s broad “ICE is not welcome” declaration is now drawing sharper scrutiny, not just for what it signals politically, but for what it means operationally in a taxpayer-funded school system. The Maine Wire has reached out to Lentz multiple times seeking clarification on the district’s ICE posture and what policies, if any, flow from the rhetoric. She has not responded as of publication.
The Maine Wire also contacted Lentz to seek comment on separate neighborhood concerns raised by parents and residents about conditions in the immediate vicinity of Portland High School, including reports of a suspected “drug house” and ongoing issues tied to homeless encampments directly across the street from the school. Lentz has not responded to those inquiries, either.
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1DKMfUuNAT
Public safety concerns near Portland High School have been a recurring issue in recent months. A homeless encampment along Lancaster Street near the school drew complaints and was cleared after police instructed people to leave, amid concerns about student safety in the area.
Lentz’s remarks reflect an increasingly common posture from progressive city institutions: treat federal immigration enforcement not merely as a law-enforcement activity, but as a destabilizing force for public schools. Critics argue the rhetoric is political posturing, and that district leadership should prioritize measurable academic outcomes, basic campus safety, and transparency over broad declarations that do not answer parents’ most immediate questions.
