LEEDS, Maine — Republican gubernatorial nominee Bobby Charles is calling on Democratic nominee Hannah Pingree and independent candidate Rick Bennett to participate in a series of five issue-focused debates this fall, arguing that Maine voters deserve longer, more substantive discussions than the traditional televised debate format.
In a challenge released Tuesday, Charles proposed holding each debate in a community directly affected by the issue under discussion, with questions coming primarily from local residents rather than media moderators.
“Every election cycle, Mainers get the same thing. One or two debates in a studio somewhere, ninety-second answers, and a moderator more interested in gotcha questions than real solutions,” Charles said in a statement. “That format doesn’t serve voters, it serves the status quo.”
Charles also criticized traditional debate formats and questioned whether media organizations that host debates can remain independent while receiving state funding through legislative appropriations.
Invoking the historic Lincoln-Douglas debates, Charles said he wants extended policy discussions centered on the communities experiencing the issues firsthand.
“As I travel across this state, every community matters to me, and we’re all connected as one Maine,” Charles said. “But I’ve also seen firsthand that some of our communities are more deeply affected by certain policy issues than others, and it’s important that we go to them directly. We need to be among average people, hardworking families, retirees, the folks living these issues every day, not hiding behind a friendly moderator in a studio.”
Under Charles’ proposal, the five debates would each focus on a single topic:
- Crime and Public Safety — Bangor: Charles said Bangor would serve as the venue for a discussion on crime, fentanyl trafficking, and Maine’s overdose crisis. He also criticized state support for syringe service programs and pointed to Bennett’s 2025 legislative vote against imposing a statewide one-for-one needle exchange requirement.
- Immigration and Border Security — Lewiston: Charles proposed Lewiston as the location for a debate on immigration policy, citing the city’s experience with refugee resettlement, housing shortages, school enrollment, and municipal services. He also referenced Bennett’s legislative vote limiting certain forms of local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.
- State Budget — Augusta: Charles said a debate in the state capital would focus on government spending, state contracting, and fiscal management, arguing that Augusta is the appropriate setting for a discussion about the state budget.
- Economic Growth and Taxation — Aroostook County: Charles proposed holding a debate in northern Maine focused on economic development, business regulation, taxation, and population decline.
- Housing and Property Taxes — Portland/Southern Maine: Charles said the final debate should address housing affordability and rising property taxes in Southern Maine, where home prices and tax burdens have become major concerns for many residents.
Charles also proposed replacing the traditional moderator-driven format with live town hall events featuring questions from local residents. He said each debate should be broadcast in its entirety without editing.
“Mainers are telling us the same thing everywhere we go. They’re worried about their taxes, their jobs, and whether their kids have a future here,” Charles said. “They deserve five real conversations in the communities living these issues every day, not one rushed hour in a TV studio.”
Charles concluded by calling on Pingree and Bennett to accept or decline the invitation by August 1.
As of Tuesday, neither Pingree’s campaign nor Bennett’s campaign had publicly responded to Charles’ proposal. The Maine Wire has reached out to both campaigns for comment and will update this story if responses are received.




It would be beneficial to have The Maine Wire be involved with hosting/participating in these potential events.
Blowhard Bellows, when asked during a public interview about the validity of a bill said “when Im Senator, I will read it after it is passed”. Havent we heard this before from Pelosi? Not read it before to actually know whats in it. Dangerous clown we dont need in charge of anything in this state period. She already has done enough damage as SOS.