The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • Podcasts
  • About
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Chinese Foreign Nationals Entering U.S. Illegally at Record Levels
  • Maine Private School Teacher Was Fired After Criticizing Critical Race Theory and Posting Jordan Peterson Videos
  • Maine on Track for Record Level of Eviction Filings This Year
  • Dem Senator Indicted Over Alleged Bribery Scheme
  • McDonald’s Is Being Sued Over a Spilled Cup of Excessively Hot Coffee — Again
  • Report of Gun Leads to Arrests, Fentanyl Seizure at Auburn Homeless Encampment
  • Portland Mayoral Candidates Explain How They Would Tackle the City’s Homelessness Crisis
  • Boston University Launches Inquiry into Ibram X. Kendi’s $43 Million Antiracism Center Amid Mass Layoffs, Accusations of Financial Mismanagement
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Login
Monday, September 25
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • Podcasts
  • About
  • Contact
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Strout: Why Won’t Campaign Finance “Reformers” Lead By Example?
Commentary

Strout: Why Won’t Campaign Finance “Reformers” Lead By Example?

Nathan StroutBy Nathan StroutSeptember 17, 2015Updated:September 17, 2015No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

This November, the people of Maine will have the opportunity to vote on a campaign finance reform proposal that advocates claim will bolster Maine’s Clean Elections Act and make our elections more transparent.  Yet these proponents refuse to act according to their own so-called principles.

If passed, Questions 1, the referendum question put forth by Mainers for Accountable Elections, would do essentially three things.

  1. Provide more funding for candidates to run under Maine’s Clean Election Act
  2. Increase fines for campaign finance violations
  3. Require independent political advertisements to reveal their three largest donors

There’s strong reasons to believe that none of these changes will have their intended effects.

[RELATED: Strout: The Liberals’ Hypocritical Dark Money Machine]

Still, I’d like to give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that they believe their referendum will increase transparency and accountability in elections.

If they do believe, however, that transparency in campaign spending is a worthy goal, then why aren’t they leading by example?

In their new campaign ad advocating for Question 1, Mainers for Accountable Elections does not reveal their top three largest donors.  Now of course they’re not legally required to do so.  Even if Question 1 passes, I don’t think campaign spending on ballot questions would be effected by the referendum.  My question, though, is if transparency is so important to them, then why don’t they lead by example and reveal their top three donors?

Screenshot (41)

I emailed Mainers for Accountable Elections a few weeks ago asking why they did not feel compelled to disclose their major donors in their television ad–they never responded.  I won’t hold my breath.

The fact that the campaign refuses to act on its own principles comes across as highly suspect.  It’s difficult to trust someone who talks the talk, but won’t walk the walk.

Truthfully, I could ask the same question of all the organizations who have come out in support of Question 1.  If transparency is so necessary in campaign finance, then why won’t these organizations reveal their donors?  How can The Maine People’s Alliance (MPA), which funnels thousands of dollars to support Democratic candidates, support a bill that reveals major donors while simultaneously keeping their donors anonymous?  It comes across as highly hypocritical that the MPA and other organizations supporting Question 1 would force certain types of advertisements to reveal the donors behind them and not hold themselves to the same standard.

If proponents of Question 1 are serious, if they aren’t simply trying to score political points while maintaining the status quo, then they should lead by example.  As it stands now, Mainers for Accountable Elections doesn’t pass the straight face test.  It’s difficult to support a cause who’s first major advertisement is steeped in hypocrisy.

Fortunately for Mainers, although apparently unfortunate for Mainers for Accountable Elections, they are required to disclose their donors to the Maine Ethics Commission.  With a little digging, one can find who is supporting the ballot initiative and why the campaign is so reluctant to disclose them.

According to a July report, Mainers for Clean Elections largest donor by far is Sean Eldridge, a wealthy investor and politician from New York.  Why a person from out of state is almost single-handedly funding a state-wide ballot question on “clean” elections is beyond me, but it certainly raises questions about why Mainers for Accountable Elections neglected to put that information on their campaign ad.  Perhaps Edridge got a taste for Maine politics when he became a massive financier of the Maine same-sex marriage ballot initiative back in 2012, or maybe he’s looking to fill in the vacuum that fellow financier Donald Sussman appears to be leaving in the state.

[RELATED: SEE Robinson: Sussman-Pingree Split Spells Trouble for Liberals]

Maybe the reason Mainers for Clean Elections elected not to publicly disclose their donors is that they saw the irony that a group whose name implies that it is locally funded and operated receives its lion’s share of support from out of state donors.

Not that there’s anything necessarily wrong with that.  If, however, you call for transparency in elections and refuse to lead by example, you’re asking for questions–and you’d better have answers ready.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
campaign finance reform Dark Money Featured Maine Maine People's Alliance Mainers for Accountable Elections Opinion
Previous ArticleStephens: Whack-a-Mole for Business
Next Article Posik: Fiorina emerges despite abysmal debate coverage by CNN
Nathan Strout
  • Website

Nathan Strout is a Development Associate with The Maine Heritage Policy Center as well as a staff writer for The Maine Wire. Born and raised in Portland, Strout is a graduate of Eastern University with a B.A. in Political Science and a minor in Legal Studies.

Related Posts

Mills: “Please Vote No On Question 3”

September 21, 2023

Who is Hansjörg Wyss, the Billionaire Swiss National Bankrolling Progressive Media and Politics in Maine?

September 20, 2023

The Road to Manhood: V. Paul Reynolds

September 20, 2023

Leave A Reply

Recent News

Chinese Foreign Nationals Entering U.S. Illegally at Record Levels

September 25, 2023

Maine Private School Teacher Was Fired After Criticizing Critical Race Theory and Posting Jordan Peterson Videos

September 25, 2023

Maine on Track for Record Level of Eviction Filings This Year

September 25, 2023

Dem Senator Indicted Over Alleged Bribery Scheme

September 22, 2023

McDonald’s Is Being Sued Over a Spilled Cup of Excessively Hot Coffee — Again

September 22, 2023
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login below or Register Now.

Lost password?

Register Now!

Already registered? Login.

A password will be e-mailed to you.