The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Cumberland County DA Weighs In to Defend Corrections Officer Who Allegedly Overstayed His Visa
  • Susan Collins Defends Her Position on Congressional Oversight of Nation’s Capital after Ted Cruz Charge
  • Maine Think Tank Urges Janet Mills to Stick to Her 2017 Position and Veto Expansion of Ranked Choice Voting
  • Border Patrol Busts 3,000 Foot Cartel Tunnel Connecting Mexico and San Diego
  • New Details on Portland Woman Identified as a Member of Antifa “Militia,” Threatened Agents
  • Westbrook Police Nab Gray Man Suspected Accused of Stealing Tools from Local Business
  • Bipartisan Bill Barring Maine Legislative Staff from Lobbying for One Year Signed into Law
  • Trump Admin Closes Biden-Era Loophole That Let China Scoop Up Americans’ DNA
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Sunday, June 22
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Commentary » The Fallout of Question 2: Increased Taxes for All
Commentary

The Fallout of Question 2: Increased Taxes for All

Jason SavageBy Jason SavageMarch 28, 2017Updated:March 28, 2017No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Those who read the first half of my take on the aftermath of Question 2 know that Maine will need to find a new way to make up for the revenues lost as a result of high-income earners fleeing our state for better tax climates.

The out-migration of high-income households is going to happen. As I said in part one, if I can find three people who tell me they’re leaving without even looking, I am sure there are going to be dozens, if not hundreds, pushed out of Maine by this referendum.

I don’t want to throw any of this out as a sky-is-falling prediction without adding a few thoughts to what I actually think will happen, so here is my take:

In the first year of a new state budget with the surtax, the structural gap could be covered with one-time transfers and gimmicks, but in the second year, those options disappear. There would be no following year to dump off problems.

Lawmakers would then be stuck trying to cut spending to make up for a significant revenue shortfall, as they won’t have time to make adjustments to income or sales tax rates.

In the following biennial budget, after the 2018 election, I predict we would see lawmakers back at their old game of knowingly creating an unbalanced budget, passing the buck through tactics similar to what they did to create the pension shortfall and the hospital debt, and looking to increase the income tax on people with lower incomes.

Ultimately, by having a top income tax rate over 10 percent, liberals will find it much easier to tell households earning $100,000, then $75,000, then $50,000, that it is time to “pay their fair share” and “this is for the children” as they move increasingly lower income households into higher tax rates.

Before we know it, struggling young families working entry-level jobs will be paying their “fair share” at rates as if they were 1-percenters in many other states with progressive income taxes.

Never forget, when Gov. Paul LePage took over the Blaine House, our top individual income tax rate was 8.5 percent on individuals earning about $20,000 per year, or households earning $40,000 per year.

Just a few years ago, Democrats were okay with taxing people as if they were “rich” when their earnings were low enough that they qualified for the Earned Income Tax Credit or were living on the edge of poverty, and they will try to do it again if this surtax is allowed to go through and their grand ideological plan is allowed to hurt Maine.

The effects of trickle-down socialism will be the equality of shared financial misery and economic pain within 5 years if this surtax is allowed to stand.

Commentary Featured
Previous ArticleSay Goodbye to Maine’s Job Creators
Next Article LePage, DHHS Call for Strict Welfare Reforms
Jason Savage

Jason Savage has been the Executive Director of the Maine GOP since 2013. Before heading up Maine's premier political party, he co-founded and served as Executive Director of the non-profit organization Maine People Before Politics, where he advocated for lower taxes, less debt, welfare reform and other priorities for Maine people. Jason's work has been published in every major newspaper in Maine.

Subscribe to Substack

Related Posts

Top Trump Official Calls On Parents To Join Fight Against Left’s Education Takeover

June 19, 2025

King 2.0 Out-Politics Pingree 2.0 on Her Home Turf at Rockland “No Kings” Rally

June 16, 2025

House Passes Bill to Bar Males from Girls’ Sports One Day After Senate Nixes Similar Bill

June 16, 2025

Leave A Reply

Subscribe to Substack
Recent News

Cumberland County DA Weighs In to Defend Corrections Officer Who Allegedly Overstayed His Visa

June 20, 2025

Susan Collins Defends Her Position on Congressional Oversight of Nation’s Capital after Ted Cruz Charge

June 20, 2025

Maine Think Tank Urges Janet Mills to Stick to Her 2017 Position and Veto Expansion of Ranked Choice Voting

June 20, 2025

Border Patrol Busts 3,000 Foot Cartel Tunnel Connecting Mexico and San Diego

June 20, 2025

New Details on Portland Woman Identified as a Member of Antifa “Militia,” Threatened Agents

June 20, 2025
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.