The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • Podcasts
  • About
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • New Maine CDC Director Recommends Masks and Latest COVID Booster for Everybody Ages 6 months and Older
  • Canadian House Speaker Apologizes After Parliament Gives ‘Hero’ Nazi Veteran a Standing Ovation
  • NASCAR Driver Austin Theriault Joins the Race for Maine’s Second Congressional District
  • Temporary Ban on New Hotel, Homeless Shelter Construction Under Consideration by Bar Harbor Town Council
  • Portland Police Warn of Bitcoin ATM Extortion Scam
  • Chinese Foreign Nationals Entering U.S. Illegally at Record Levels
  • Maine Private School Teacher Was Fired After Criticizing Critical Race Theory and Posting Jordan Peterson Videos
  • Maine on Track for Record Level of Eviction Filings This Year
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Login
Tuesday, September 26
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • Podcasts
  • About
  • Contact
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Net neutrality stifles investment and innovation
News

Net neutrality stifles investment and innovation

Adam CrepeauBy Adam CrepeauJuly 28, 2019Updated:July 28, 2019No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Lawmakers and special interests always seem to title their bills with buzzwords that make them sound like they are going to save humanity. H.R. 1644, otherwise known as the “Save the Internet Act of 2019,” is no different. It’s an attempt to restore net neutrality rules and the legal framework to regulate Internet Service Providers (ISPs) across the country. The bill passed in the United States House of Representatives in April with 232 votes in favor and 190 in opposition.

The Save the Internet Act would allow the Federal Communications Commission to regulate internet service providers like they are utility companies, which includes reinstating net neutrality regulations. 

Net neutrality regulations typically mandate that all internet service providers treat all internet traffic equally, which includes disabling them from blocking content, throttling service or prioritizing content. While proponents of this legislation believe consumers will be mistreated without it, these additional regulations were not necessary to realize unprecedented growth of companies such as Amazon, Google and others. In other words, the internet grew exponentially without net neutrality regulations and it will continue to realize growth without them. 

One of proponents’ biggest fears is that content will be filtered or individuals will not be able to express themselves freely on the internet without net neutrality regulations. Despite this, these regulations exclude big tech companies such as Google and Facebook from filtering search results and throttling what can be read or seen through their services. More than 90 percent of all internet searches are conducted through Google’s platforms alone. If net neutrality supporters are concerned with censorship of the internet, they should be worried about what these platforms can do.

The Save the Internet Act would do more harm than good in rural states like Maine. According to a letter sent from 63 small internet service providers to the Federal Communications Commission, the Title II structure for net neutrality stifles investment, especially in rural areas. For example, service providers’ capital expenditures decreased $2.4 billion from 2014 to 2016, primarily in rural areas. According to a US Telecom Issue Brief, broadband investments increased by at least $1.5 billion after net neutrality regulations under Title II were repealed in 2017. This illuminates the fact that government regulations hinder capital investment, which has an overall negative impact on consumers. In short, you can’t miss what you never had in the first place. 

It should be noted that Maine recently adopted its own net neutrality guidelines this session. LD 1364 prevents ISPs that are contracted by the state of Maine from engaging in throttling their services, paid prioritization of some traffic over other traffic, or blocking some content. However, this law will not affect ISPs that are not contracted by the state of Maine. 

If the United States were to reinstate these regulations on ISPs, it would likely result in reduced private investment in the state of Maine and other rural areas of the country. There were countless proposals this legislative session to make “strategic investments” in broadband infrastructure in rural Maine because areas of the state are underserved. However, if net neutrality regulations are enacted to include all providers at the state or federal level, it will be far more difficult to attract internet service providers to operate in rural Maine.

Our state and federal governments should not be involved in regulating internet services in this fashion, and should instead allow free markets to direct investment across the country.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Big Tech Commentary Congress content provider Featured federal communications commission internet service provider Net Neutrality Opinion Save the Internet Act tech policy technology
Previous ArticleMaine’s prevailing wage law is expensive and outdated
Next Article Does Maine spend too much on school administration?
Adam Crepeau

Adam Crepeau is a former policy analyst at Maine Policy Institute.

Related Posts

New Maine CDC Director Recommends Masks and Latest COVID Booster for Everybody Ages 6 months and Older

September 25, 2023

Canadian House Speaker Apologizes After Parliament Gives ‘Hero’ Nazi Veteran a Standing Ovation

September 25, 2023

NASCAR Driver Austin Theriault Joins the Race for Maine’s Second Congressional District

September 25, 2023

Leave A Reply

Recent News

New Maine CDC Director Recommends Masks and Latest COVID Booster for Everybody Ages 6 months and Older

September 25, 2023

Canadian House Speaker Apologizes After Parliament Gives ‘Hero’ Nazi Veteran a Standing Ovation

September 25, 2023

NASCAR Driver Austin Theriault Joins the Race for Maine’s Second Congressional District

September 25, 2023

Temporary Ban on New Hotel, Homeless Shelter Construction Under Consideration by Bar Harbor Town Council

September 25, 2023

Portland Police Warn of Bitcoin ATM Extortion Scam

September 25, 2023
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login below or Register Now.

Lost password?

Register Now!

Already registered? Login.

A password will be e-mailed to you.