The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Battle Over SNAP Funding Intensifies as Court Blocks Order Requiring Full Payments
  • Mills Directs Full SNAP Benefits for November After Court Orders, USDA Guidance
  • MSAD 54 Prompted Students to Discuss “Male Gender Stereotypes,” “Assumptions of Gender Roles” on Friday
  • DA Dysfunction: Top ADA Exits Jackie Sartoris’ Office Amid Allegations of Toxic Work Environment 
  • Child Walking To School In Maine’s Largest City Attacked By Stranger In Second Incident
  • Nation’s First Trans-Identifying State Legislator Pleads Guilty to Child Sex Crimes
  • Armed Homeless Sex Offender with Extensive Criminal History Apprehended After Fleeing Police in Stetson
  • Legendary Maine Weather, Wisdom Standby Folds Due To Change In Reading Atmospherics
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Sunday, November 9
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
The Maine Wire
Home » News » News » Maine Dems Propose Using a Local Option Sales Tax to Fund Affordable Housing Initiatives
News

Maine Dems Propose Using a Local Option Sales Tax to Fund Affordable Housing Initiatives

Libby PalanzaBy Libby PalanzaMarch 10, 2025Updated:March 10, 202521 Comments6 Mins Read1K Views
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

A group of Maine Democratic lawmakers have introduced a bill that would allow municipalities to adopt a local option sales tax to fund affordable housing initiatives.

If approved, this law would give cities and towns the option of imposing a two percent sales tax on the cost of hotel rentals.

While the majority of revenue generated would be returned to municipalities, 15 percent would be reserved for the Maine State Housing Authority and administrative costs.

To opt into this program, residents would need to approve of the sales tax in a referendum vote. To be valid, the total number of votes cast would need to be at least 20 percent of the total number of ballots submitted in the municipality during the most recent gubernatorial election.

Participating municipalities would only be allowed to use their share of the revenue collected for qualifying affordable housing programs.

For the purposes of this bill, a “program for affordable housing” is defined as one of three things: (1) a housing development that is “wholly or partly” subsidized by municipal funds where at least half the units are affordable, (2) rental assistance for lower and moderate income households, or (3) another program that provides “assistance for or support[s] affordable housing.”

The 15 percent allocated toward the Maine State Housing Authority would be reserved for affordable housing and rental programs in rural areas.

A small fraction of the funds collected could be spent on administrative costs — either two percent of the total revenue generated or the actual expenses, whichever is less.

In any municipality that approved them, local option sales taxes would take effect on the first day of the first month beginning 120 days after the referendum in which they were passed.

This proposal, LD 632, was sponsored by Rep. Charles A. Skold (D-Portland) and cosponsored by Rep. Michael F. Brennan (D-Portland), Rep. Janice S. Dodge (D-Belfast), Speaker of the House Ryan D. Fecteau (D-Biddeford), Rep. Gary Friedmann (D-Bar Harbor), Rep. Cheryl A. Golek (D-Harpswell), Rep. Tavis Rock Hasenfus (D-Readfield), Rep. Ann Higgins Matlack (D-St. George), and Rep. Ambureen Rana (D-Bangor).

A public hearing for LD 632 has been scheduled for March 12 at 1pm in State House Room 127. Testimony may also be submitted online at www.mainelegislature.org/testimony.

Click Here for More Information on LD 632

Another Democrat-led bill seeks to impose a local option sales tax on prepared food and living quarter rentals to fund a property tax stabilization program for Maine’s seniors.

Under this bill, those granted property tax stabilization would not see their property tax bills further increase. Whatever amount was owed for the year in which stabilization was requested is what the homeowner would continue to pay going forward.

Because this would inevitably result in a loss of revenue to municipalities, the measure would grant them the authority to establish a one percent local option sales tax on lodging and prepared food.

Cities and towns that exercise this option would, in turn, only be permitted to use the money generated by this tax to cover the stabilization program’s cost.

[RELATED: Maine Lawmakers Again Consider Stabilizing Seniors’ Property Taxes — Here’s How They Plan to Fund It.]

Allowing municipalities to adopt a local option sales tax is not a new concept in Maine, but previous attempts to pave the way for such policies have been met with resistance.

In response to a bill brought forward in 2019, multiple Maine-based think tanks issued reports denouncing local option sales taxes.

A policy brief published by the Maine Policy Institute argued that these taxes “would alter consumer behavior to hurt Maine businesses.”

Evidence included in the report demonstrated that local option sales taxes increase “cross-border shopping from high-tax jurisdictions to low-tax jurisdictions by 10 to 14 percent.”

Because New Hampshire imposes no sales tax, Maine businesses already lose customers to their competitors across the border, and the Maine Policy Institute suggested that the implementation of a local option sales tax would only exacerbate this phenomenon.

“Per capita retail sales in New Hampshire border counties ($19,644) outperform per capita retail sales in Maine border counties ($11,962) by nearly $7,700 per person,” the think tank reported.

Although the local option sales tax included in the recently introduced legislation would apply only to lodging, the tax burden could still be expected to fall largely on Mainers, not tourists.

According to the Maine Policy Institute’s 2019 report, “Mainers account for about 70 percent of meal sales and 30 percent of lodging sales statewide.”

This report also shows that the sales taxes, in general, are regressive, as the “lowest 20 percent of income earners in Maine pay an effective sales and excise tax rate of 6.1 percent whereas Maine’s top earners pay just 0.7 percent.”

Some similar arguments were advanced at the time by the Maine Center for Economic Policy (MECEP).

In a 2019 policy brief, MECEP argued that local option sales taxes “disproportionately affect lower-income Mainers” and “deepen economic inequality.”

MECEP also argued that all municipalities would not benefit equally from local option sales taxes, as just ten localities are responsible for 45 percent of the state’s meals and lodging tax revenues while being home to just 16 percent of the population.

“Local option sales taxes are a tool that would empower some communities while doing little — or even nothing — for others,” MECEP wrote. “That’s because such taxes are feasible for those municipalities with enough commerce to raise meaningful revenue but not for those communities, often rural ones, without such a sales base.”

According to the Tax Foundation — a Washington D.C. based think tank — local option sales taxes first emerged during the Great Depression and were intended to increase the amount of money being collected by state and local governments, as well as to help diversify local revenue structures.

The Tax Foundation suggests that today, local option sales taxes help “counties and cities with growing commercial activity and personal consumption” to achieve greater financial stability and independence by establishing an additional source of local revenue.

Disclaimer: The Maine Wire is a project of the Maine Policy Institute.

Previous ArticleTeacher Fired For Not Using Student’s Trans Pronouns Wins Settlement
Next Article Republican Led Maine Bill Would Allow Teachers to Conceal-Carry at Schools
Libby Palanza

Libby Palanza is a reporter for the Maine Wire and a lifelong Mainer. She graduated from Harvard University with a degree in Government and History. She can be reached at palanza@themainewire.com.

Subscribe to Substack

Related Posts

Mills Directs Full SNAP Benefits for November After Court Orders, USDA Guidance

November 8, 2025

Battle Over SNAP Funding Intensifies as Court Blocks Order Requiring Full Payments

November 8, 2025

MSAD 54 Prompted Students to Discuss “Male Gender Stereotypes,” “Assumptions of Gender Roles” on Friday

November 8, 2025

<span class="dsq-postid" data-dsqidentifier="36401 https://www.themainewire.com/?p=36401">21 Comments

  1. Jimmy Potatoes on March 10, 2025 2:57 PM

    More taxes, whoda guessed. This will be a boon for New Hampshire. I want to change my guess for when the democrats destroy the state from 2025 to 6 years ago.

  2. C Simms on March 10, 2025 3:03 PM

    Wait till they try to do it to online sales, it’ll be a revolt like hasn’t been seen since the tea party. Tar and feathers for everyone!

  3. John on March 10, 2025 3:09 PM

    and half of the tax would go to democrat pockets.

  4. Eric H. on March 10, 2025 3:41 PM

    These people need to be sent home in 2026 .
    Democrats are destroying the state .
    DESTROYING IT !

  5. Joel on March 10, 2025 3:43 PM

    Affordable housing for who I wonder?

  6. Eric H. on March 10, 2025 3:47 PM

    A Somali in every neighborhood .
    A welfare office in every community .
    Maine is going straight to hell .
    Democrats are ruining it ,

  7. Boxcar on March 10, 2025 4:50 PM

    Kiss Portland, Lewiston, and Bangor GOODBYE!!!

  8. Boxcar on March 10, 2025 4:53 PM

    Maine’s the 2nd HIGHEST TAXED STATE IN THIS HERE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Democrats never met a tax they didn’t love.

  9. Olde Crone on March 10, 2025 5:31 PM

    NO NEW TAXES. STOP THE STUPID SPENDING. INVEST IN DEPORTATION.

  10. Charles Greene on March 10, 2025 6:29 PM

    They want that local sales tax very badly.

  11. Beachmom on March 10, 2025 6:46 PM

    Democrats in this state seem to only be capable of attracting and fostering failure.
    All this subsidized housing costs us money.
    So tired of this stuff

  12. Dan on March 10, 2025 7:06 PM

    The party of zero common sense.
    Making everything else in the community more expensive to hide the cost. The residents will also have to pay more taxes to live there, saving less.
    Government needs to cut the red tape for builders and allow them to build an adequate supply, exempt from political payoffs every step of the way, delaying projects, until there is enough housing, which will put downward pressure on prices.

  13. Eeddyedward on March 11, 2025 3:44 AM

    Portland will sign up for this lunacy in a heartbeat! Please sir may I have another! Fools are going to tax themselves right into the crapper! Portland High will become Mogadishu High soon enough! C’mon man

  14. sandy on March 11, 2025 5:40 AM

    Just more money for the elected to steal as DOAGE has shown!

  15. Willy Better on March 11, 2025 6:24 AM

    Sandy PLEASE .
    It’s not DOAGE
    It’s DOGE
    Pronounce it like DOG EEE .
    LOL

  16. axylos on March 11, 2025 7:18 AM

    Mainers when are you going to wake up? The Communists are ruining what was once a beautiful state. I am done, moving to another state that is cheaper and cares about its citizens.

  17. David McIntosh on March 11, 2025 7:23 AM

    The root cause of affordable housing is the Air BnB thing. It’s hard to tell someone what to do with their properties, but if we did long term rentals for every Air BnB thing we’d take care of the “crisis”.

  18. Bob on March 11, 2025 7:25 AM

    Lol,ohhhhh look, you vote in these whacked out democrats, they declare your city a sanctuary city, now going to tax you more to house illegals!!! You think the price of eggs are crazy, wait till you see how much free loading illegals eat!!!!!!!

  19. Robert on March 11, 2025 8:01 AM

    Why is it now become the “mission” of the democratic legislature to provide affordable housing for anyone? Why hasn’t anyone taken the step of suing the legislature for deviating from their purpose which does not include providing affordable housing since no housing is a guaranty of the constitution of the state of Maine. This is a clear breach of fiduciary responsibility to the citizens of Maine who were stupid enough to elect these clowns.

  20. David on March 11, 2025 8:39 AM

    Democrats in Maine will not stop until Maine becomes #1? The Highest Taxed State in the Union!

    When are the people of Maine going to Learn? Democratic control is ruining the Maine Way of Life!

  21. Mooseman on March 12, 2025 5:40 PM

    So the solution to high taxes and over regulation is more taxes and more regulation, got it. Democrats in the state of Maine are absolutely ridiculous, no common sense whatsoever. Clearly every Mainer with a job and a pulse is a member of the evil rich. I will never vote for another Democrat ever again.

Leave A Reply

Subscribe to Substack
Recent News

Mills Directs Full SNAP Benefits for November After Court Orders, USDA Guidance

November 8, 2025

Battle Over SNAP Funding Intensifies as Court Blocks Order Requiring Full Payments

November 8, 2025

MSAD 54 Prompted Students to Discuss “Male Gender Stereotypes,” “Assumptions of Gender Roles” on Friday

November 8, 2025

DA Dysfunction: Top ADA Exits Jackie Sartoris’ Office Amid Allegations of Toxic Work Environment 

November 8, 2025

Child Walking To School In Maine’s Largest City Attacked By Stranger In Second Incident

November 7, 2025
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.