The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • USDA Shuts Down U.S. Mexico Livestock Trade to Contain Deadly Flesh-Eating Parasite Spreading in Mexico That Can Devastate Herds and Infest Humans
  • Maine’s “Success” Battling Overdoses Lost In The (Chinese) Weeds
  • Maine Supreme Court Upholds Shenna Bellows’ Wording of Voter ID Referendum Question
  • Circuit Court Voids FTC’s Rules Making It Easier to Cancel Subscriptions, But Mainers Will Still Reap the Benefits Under New, Bipartisan Law
  • Jared Golden Sponsors Bill Increasing Penalties for Violence Against Law Enforcement as Attacks Spike
  • Massachusetts Republican Party Credits The Maine Wire for Triad Weed Bust in Their State
  • Pro-Mamdani PAC Took Donation From Islamist Cleric Who Vouched For Terror Plot Mastermind
  • Kids Behaving Badly: Six Juveniles Charged in Connection to Burglaries, Vandalism in Bingham
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Saturday, July 12
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Commentary » Plastic Bag Bans Are Based on Hype, Not Science
Commentary

Plastic Bag Bans Are Based on Hype, Not Science

Nathan StroutBy Nathan StroutNovember 17, 2014No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

With Falmouth considering a ban or fee on plastic bags, it’s important to look at the facts instead of being blinded by hype and emotions.

The popular opinion is that plastic bags are having a devastating effect on the environment.  Their production is harmful to the environment, they cannot be easily recycled, and they significantly contribute to the amount of waste we produce.

However, these popular claims are not as solidly based on science as their proponents would have you think.  Let’s take a look at the first statement, that the production of plastic bags is harmful.  Proponents often claim that plastic bag production uses 12 million barrels of oil each year.  Banning plastic bags would decrease the global demand for oil, possibly lowering prices at the pump and lesson our dependence on foreign oil.

Except that claim isn’t quite true.  Plastic bags are not made with crude oil in America.  Instead, they’re made mostly from clean natural gas and natural gas liquids.  Essentially, banning plastic bags would have no effect on crude oil consumption.

In fact, most studies show that the production of paper bags has a worse impact on the environment.  Paper bags use more resources, and their production releases more pollutants than plastic bags.

What about the second claim, that plastic bags are difficult to recycle?  Well, that’s not really true either.  Many retailers accept used plastic bags and similar products for recycling.  A quick search of the Greater Portland area found dozens of businesses willing to accept plastic bags.  Beyond that, many households use “single-use” plastic bags multiple times.  Growing up, my family recycled used plastic bags as makeshift lunchboxes, garbage bags, and backpacks all the time.

Of course, the most frequently made argument for banning plastic bags is that they are filling our landfills and polluting our environment.  If you’ve continued this far in the article, you know what my answer to that claim is.  It’s not true.

In 2011, a study published by the University of Maine School of Economics showed that plastic bags make up only .82% of the total waste produced in Maine.  Newspapers, which can be easily recycled through curbside programs in many municipalities, accounts for almost three times as much waste as plastic bags.

In 2009, Steven Stein of Environmental Resources Planning conducted the Keep America Beautiful (KAB) survey.  The results of that survey showed that plastic bag make up only 0.6% of litter nationwide.  When we look at the numbers, instead of just listening to the hype, we find that plastic bags account for only the tiniest fraction of our nations litter and waste.

The alternatives to plastic bags are not without environmental concerns.  Paper bags use many more resources in their production, and add more greenhouse gases than their plastic alternative.  While they may be recycled at a higher rate, they tend to have worse overall environmental impact than the easy to produce plastic bags.  Even reusable cloth bags have some negative attributes.  Not only is their production more costly than plastic bags, but they require constant washing, which wastes water.  A recent study by the Reason Foundation concluded that plastic bags actually had less of an environmental impact than the alternatives.

With Portland implementing a 5 cents use tax on plastic bags next year, and both Falmouth and Freeport are eyeing similar measures or all out bans.  These efforts are based on misinformation and hype, not data.  Data shows us that plastic bags are not a serious threat to our communities, and in many ways are more environmentally friendly than alternatives.  Plastic bags create less pollution in production, are easy to recycle, and make up only a minuscule part of waste and litter.

Don’t listen to the anti-science propaganda.  Listen to the data.

 

 

 

Commentary Opinion plastic bags
Previous ArticleIs Maine the Safest State in America? Almost.
Next Article Daily Catch 11/24/14: MHPC in the News, Obama’s Executive Order, and Portland’s Minimum Wage Hike
Nathan Strout
  • Website

Nathan Strout is a Development Associate with The Maine Heritage Policy Center as well as a staff writer for The Maine Wire. Born and raised in Portland, Strout is a graduate of Eastern University with a B.A. in Political Science and a minor in Legal Studies.

Subscribe to Substack

Related Posts

Maine’s “Success” Battling Overdoses Lost In The (Chinese) Weeds

July 12, 2025

New Maine Energy Law Promises Ratepayer Relief, but Instead Delivers Political Cover for Democrats in the 2026 Midterms

July 9, 2025
(Screen Capture: PBS News Hour)

TRENT ENGLAND And JASON SNEAD: Time To Say Goodbye To Ranked Choice Voting

July 8, 2025

Leave A Reply

Subscribe to Substack
Recent News

USDA Shuts Down U.S. Mexico Livestock Trade to Contain Deadly Flesh-Eating Parasite Spreading in Mexico That Can Devastate Herds and Infest Humans

July 12, 2025

Maine Supreme Court Upholds Shenna Bellows’ Wording of Voter ID Referendum Question

July 11, 2025

Circuit Court Voids FTC’s Rules Making It Easier to Cancel Subscriptions, But Mainers Will Still Reap the Benefits Under New, Bipartisan Law

July 11, 2025

Jared Golden Sponsors Bill Increasing Penalties for Violence Against Law Enforcement as Attacks Spike

July 11, 2025

Massachusetts Republican Party Credits The Maine Wire for Triad Weed Bust in Their State

July 11, 2025
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.