The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • “If You Don’t Want Us To End Up In Blofeld’s Piranha Pond, You Must Buy My $4.2 Million Maine Cottage” – 007
  • A New Barrier Fence Is Among Nearly $5 Million Worth of Upgrades Being Made to the Blaine House This Year
  • Supreme Court Lets Trump Admin Move Forward With Slashing Education Department Staff
  • Youth Injured in Shooting at the Same Lewiston Housing Complex Where Another Teen Was Fatally Shot Last Year
  • Connecticut Man Arrested For Allegedly Luring a Minor to Lewiston Park
  • Troopers Investigating Fatal Hit-and-Run in Albion That Left Child Dead, Two Injured
  • Portland Bomb Squad Deems ‘Suspicious Package’ at Busy Intersection Not Hazardous
  • Lawsuit Against Midcoast Maine Private School Alleges Student Abuse That Officials Strongly Deny
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Monday, July 14
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
  • Donate
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Commentary » PUC decision confirms ratepayers pay twice
Commentary

PUC decision confirms ratepayers pay twice

Paul LePageBy Paul LePageFebruary 22, 2017No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Our electricity rates are far above the national average—Maine has moved up from the 12th highest rates to the 11th highest in the United States.

High rates have destroyed our industrial base, our commercial base and, more importantly, are causing higher rates for those who can least afford it, our retirees. The decision by the Public Utilities Commission to compensate owners of solar panels for transmission and distribution is taking Maine in the wrong direction. It increases prices on ratepayers by charging them twice for T and D of electricity.

I agree solar customers should be compensated for the electricity they generate at fair market rates. However, other Mainers should not have to subsidize their installation costs to make solar viable.

If affluent people choose to put expensive solar panels on their roof, poor and elderly Mainers should not have to pay for it.

The PUC is shifting the burden away from those who have the resources to afford roof-top solar installations and onto ratepayers, including low-income and elderly customers. They are also putting more of a burden on businesses that are already operating on very thin margins and cannot afford to pay higher rates. Businesses need all the help they can get to stay competitive and create good jobs. Raising electricity rates is taking resources away from higher wages.

This rate hike was pushed by environmentalists, special interests, the public advocate and some Legislative leaders. Rather than protect Maine ratepayers, the PUC caved to special interests.

Even worse, wealthy people with solar panels are being paid for the excess electricity they generate and for the transmission and distribution of the excess power. But Emera and CMP also charge the ratepayers to transmit and distribute this excess electricity.

That means ratepayers are being charged twice so affluent people who put solar panels on their roof can recoup their money faster.

The solar industry lining its pockets on the backs of hardworking Mainers—not to mention our poor and most vulnerable who can least afford it.

We should be able to agree on a sensible energy policy. We should provide the most affordable energy that does the least harm to the environment.

But liberals continue to support their favorite—and very expensive—forms of renewal energy. They have no political desire to reduce rates for Mainers, and they continue to deny the harm they are doing to our job creators and our economy. Put very simply, higher rates leave less money for higher wages.

We are going backwards. But I will continue to fight to lower rates for our elderly and poor Mainers and for our businesses that create good jobs. Someone has to protect them from wealthy special interests and lobbyists in the halls of the State House.

Commentary Featured
Previous ArticleLePage: Union lobbyist Ryan Tipping should resign his House seat
Next Article Effort to Expand Medicaid at the Ballot Box is Bad for Maine
Paul LePage

Governor Paul LePage (R) served as the 74th Governor of Maine. Prior to his time as governor, LePage served as the general manager of Marden's and as the mayor of Waterville.

Subscribe to Substack

Related Posts

Maine’s “Success” Battling Overdoses Lost In The (Chinese) Weeds

July 12, 2025

New Maine Energy Law Promises Ratepayer Relief, but Instead Delivers Political Cover for Democrats in the 2026 Midterms

July 9, 2025
(Screen Capture: PBS News Hour)

TRENT ENGLAND And JASON SNEAD: Time To Say Goodbye To Ranked Choice Voting

July 8, 2025

Leave A Reply

Subscribe to Substack
Recent News

“If You Don’t Want Us To End Up In Blofeld’s Piranha Pond, You Must Buy My $4.2 Million Maine Cottage” – 007

July 14, 2025

A New Barrier Fence Is Among Nearly $5 Million Worth of Upgrades Being Made to the Blaine House This Year

July 14, 2025

Youth Injured in Shooting at the Same Lewiston Housing Complex Where Another Teen Was Fatally Shot Last Year

July 14, 2025

Connecticut Man Arrested For Allegedly Luring a Minor to Lewiston Park

July 14, 2025

Troopers Investigating Fatal Hit-and-Run in Albion That Left Child Dead, Two Injured

July 14, 2025
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.