The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • Podcasts
  • About
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Mills: “Please Vote No On Question 3”
  • Mills Backs Goal of Increasing Heat Pump Installations Four-Fold By 2030 In Her Role As Co-Chair of the US Climate Alliance
  • Unanswered Questions After South Portland Cops Called to Human Rights Commission Chair’s Home: 911 Transcript
  • Children’s Book in Maine Schools Tells Kids to Trust Corporate Media — Not Their Parents: News Literacy Project
  • Maine’s Workforce Participation Rate Remained Below National Average in August: MDOL
  • Biden Admin Extends Temporary Protected Status to 472,000 Venezuelan Nationals Living in the US
  • Sam Bankman-Fried’s Fraudulent FTX Crypto Scheme Funneled Cash to Left-Wing Groups Through Arabella Advisors: Lawsuit
  • Portland Public Schools Enrolled More Than 300 Homeless Students for 2022-2023 School Year
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Login
Thursday, September 21
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Maine Wire TV
  • Podcasts
  • About
  • Contact
The Maine Wire
Home » News » The Supreme Court and Democracy
Commentary

The Supreme Court and Democracy

John FraryBy John FraryJuly 25, 2018Updated:July 25, 2018No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This year’s voting will be more exciting than usual in Maine. The Democrats are eager to regain control of the state government and resume its pace of growth. Republicans are hoping for an extension of the LePage reforms. The Maine Peoples Alliance, having failed in an all-out effort to win Lewiston’s mayoral office, is hoping to create a Referendum Party by drawing from out-of-state funding to pass boob-bait like Question 1.

These issues will attract most of the state’s political energy, but national factors and long-term consequences make the Supreme Court of the United States United States (SCOTUS) nominations far more important. President Trump’s inability to stop talking and tweeting long enough to think has diverted attention to Vladimir Putin for a while, but the Left-Lurchers will soon come back to the Kavanaugh nomination in full force. Even if they keep Trump to a single term, a conservative majority on the SCOTUS will influence our country long after his remains are laid to rest. The Left has repeatedly relied on progressive courts to achieve policy goals they cannot achieve through elections and legislation, and the fear of losing that option makes them really, really mad.

The New Yorker’s John Cassidy explained this in a June 11, essay “Why It’s Right to Be Mad about Kavanaugh and the Supreme Court.” According to his historical review “the Republican Party has carefully exploited the biases and shortcomings of the political system.” If the Republicans succeed in installing their latest nominee, it will be, as Cassidy tells us, “the latest act in an anti-democratic (small “d”) heist. Democrats, Independents, and anybody else who cares about the functioning of American democracy have good reason to be sore.”

Before descending more deeply into Cassidy’s profundities, let’s acknowledge that the Supreme Court, far from being a Democratic institution, is a tight little oligarchy. The defunct Soviet Politburo was a little more inclusive, but not by much. One person, only one, has the power to nominate a person for the SCOTUS bench. Eliminate the filibuster it requires no more than fifty-one persons to approve this nomination. The list of persons considered for nomination will not exceed one hundred names (if that). And that list is developed by surveying a thousand judges, professors, distinguished lawyers, and influential politicians. Argue for two thousand, if you wish, or five thousand. It remains an oligarchical institution, not a democratic institution.

Cassidy would realize this if he thought about it. But he is too anxious to demonstrate that conservatives are not entitled to appoint conservative justices, much less a conservative majority. He writes to expose “an outrageous power grab by a radicalized political party, its wealthy backers, and a rogue President.”

John Roberts and Samuel Alito might not be sitting on the court today if the SCOTUS, under Chief Justice William Rehnquist, had not halted the Florida recount, allowing the election of a Republican president who lost the popular vote. If, in 2016, Mitch McConnell, the Senate Majority Leader, had allowed filibusters on the nomination of Merrick Garland, Gorsuch might not be a Justice. And by nullifying Hillary Clinton’s almost three-million-ballot margin of victory in the popular vote, the Electoral College threatens us with a Justice Kavanaugh.

What’s worse, the Republican Party has deliberately used the U.S. Constitution to control the U.S. Constitution. No kidding! This is Cassidy’s argument. The Republican Party has also relied on the U.S. Senate, where the 1.7 million residents of Idaho receive the same number of representatives as the 39.5 million residents of California.

Clinching his argument, Cassidy concluded that “This isn’t how democracies are supposed to work.” His conclusion is not false. This is not how democracies are supposed to work. This is how the Constitution is supposed to work.

Commentary Featured SCOTUS Supreme Court
Previous ArticleLiberals are holding tax conformity hostage to fund their elections with taxpayer dollars
Next Article We’re reforming our child welfare system to protect our children
John Frary

Professor John Frary of Farmington, Maine is a former US Congress candidate, retired history professor, a Board Member of Maine Taxpayers United and publisher of www.fraryhomecompanion.com. He can be reached at jfrary8070@aol.com.

Related Posts

Mills: “Please Vote No On Question 3”

September 21, 2023

Who is Hansjörg Wyss, the Swiss National Bankrolling Progressive Media and Politics in Maine?

September 20, 2023

The Road to Manhood: V. Paul Reynolds

September 20, 2023

Leave A Reply

Recent News

Mills Backs Goal of Increasing Heat Pump Installations Four-Fold By 2030 In Her Role As Co-Chair of the US Climate Alliance

September 21, 2023

Unanswered Questions After South Portland Cops Called to Human Rights Commission Chair’s Home: 911 Transcript

September 21, 2023

Children’s Book in Maine Schools Tells Kids to Trust Corporate Media — Not Their Parents: News Literacy Project

September 21, 2023

Maine’s Workforce Participation Rate Remained Below National Average in August: MDOL

September 21, 2023

Biden Admin Extends Temporary Protected Status to 472,000 Venezuelan Nationals Living in the US

September 21, 2023
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login below or Register Now.

Lost password?

Register Now!

Already registered? Login.

A password will be e-mailed to you.