The Maine Wire
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending News
  • Word To The Wise: Don’t Climb Atop A Bus ‘While Vehicle Is In Motion’
  • How Do Mainers Feel About Fall Tourists?
  • How Does Maine’s Tax Landscape Stack Up?
  • Portland Housing Authority Tree to be Used for Portland Downtown Holiday Tree
  • New York Comes to Maine, Bringing Trouble to Paradise
  • Epstein Files Battle Erupts in House After Bipartisan Push Forces Vote
  • Nearly $35 Million for Maine Projects Secured by Sen. Collins in Federal Funding Bills
  • What Addiction? 
Facebook Twitter Instagram
The Maine Wire
Friday, November 14
  • News
  • Commentary
  • The Blog
  • About
    • Contact
  • Investigations
    • Data
The Maine Wire
Home » News » Commentary » Seven Communities to Lose Education Funding Under Question 2
Commentary

Seven Communities to Lose Education Funding Under Question 2

Krysta WestBy Krysta WestOctober 19, 2016No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

If you’re from the town of Sebago, Lincolnville, Greenwood, Bremen, Newry, Machiasport, or Jonesport, Question 2 should worry you immensely. You see, while many people are talking about the 130 Maine communities that won’t receive an additional cent under this tax increase for education, seven of those towns will actually lose funding.

That’s right, in spite of the fact that some of these towns have unemployment rates above the state average and more than half have an average median household income below the state average, they will lose thousands of dollars in education funding under Question 2.

Although proponents such as John Kosinski with the Maine Education Association claim that Question 2 will be the great equalizer in education funding, that simply isn’t true because the EPS formula used to determine municipal funding for education only accounts for the land wealth of a community. The formula fails to address the actual ability of the citizens to pay for education because it doesn’t consider unemployment rates or the median household income of a community.

So, by simply funneling additional funds into the existing system, 130 communities such as Greenville and Acton, towns that really need additional resources to level the playing field, will be left in the cold.

And if you live in one of those seven communities, your children will receive less funding under the EPS formula than you do without this additional tax on small businesses.

So where will the money go? Sixty percent of the funding raised by Question 2 would go to only 12 percent of towns. The fourteen towns that stand to receive a total of $22 million including Falmouth, Cape Elizabeth and Yarmouth that have an annual median household income in excess of $70,000 and extremely low unemployment levels.

While proponents of the initiative defend this disparity and believe it to be fair, I don’t think that anyone will argue that Cape Elizabeth, a town that spends above and beyond the EPS formula to provide their students with the very best K-12 education their tax dollars can give are deserving of millions in additional funding while poverty stricken towns such as Greenville, that are struggling to meet the basics, deserve nothing.

Even worse, who would argue that Jonesport, a town with over 20 percent unemployment and a median household income $15,471 below the state average, deserves less funding.

The argument that Question 2 will level the playing field for Maine’s students doesn’t pass the straight face test.

For a full list of the 130 towns that will receive no additional funding, calculated with data from the Department of Education, view The Maine Heritage Policy Center’s latest report at www.mainepolicy.org.

education Education Funding Featured income tax MEA Opinion question 2 referendum tax tax increase
Previous ArticleQuestion 3 is an Insult to Mainers
Next Article Governor Raises Concern Over Land for Maine’s Future Project
Krysta West

Krysta West is the Communications Director for The Maine Heritage Policy Center. Prior to her time with MHPC, Krysta served as a Legislative Assistant at the National Rifle Association. Krysta is a native of Arundel, Maine, and has served as an aide in the Maine Legislature.

Subscribe to Substack

Related Posts

New York Comes to Maine, Bringing Trouble to Paradise

November 14, 2025

What Addiction? 

November 14, 2025

Ballot Box Boomerang: Will Maine Republicans Overcome Their Addiction to Legislating by Referendum?

November 11, 2025
Subscribe to Substack
Recent News

Word To The Wise: Don’t Climb Atop A Bus ‘While Vehicle Is In Motion’

November 14, 2025

How Do Mainers Feel About Fall Tourists?

November 14, 2025

How Does Maine’s Tax Landscape Stack Up?

November 14, 2025

Portland Housing Authority Tree to be Used for Portland Downtown Holiday Tree

November 14, 2025

Epstein Files Battle Erupts in House After Bipartisan Push Forces Vote

November 14, 2025
Newsletter

News

  • News
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Media Watch
  • Education
  • Media

Maine Wire

  • About the Maine Wire
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Submit Commentary
  • Complaints
  • Maine Policy Institute

Resources

  • Maine Legislature
  • Legislation Finder
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Maine Wire TV

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS
  • Post Office Box 7829, Portland, Maine 04112

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.